-
Why have all these coaches left?
A. Better opportunities
B. More Money
C. The AD
D. All of the above
Frankly, I was overjoyed that Chizik was leaving town, but if Cael left because of the money- I'd do the same thing if the opportunity presented itself.
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
B.
There shouldn't be anything better than coaching at Iowa State. The simple life, nice people, beautiful campus, loyal fans....great team colors.....why would you leave?
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
You reap what you sow. Jamie came in and in two years fired ten coaching staffs. Not ten coaches, ten staffs. That is a lot of people and families -- and outside of the football staff and the million bucks he paid to Wayne Morgan, most of them do not have large incomes and most of them only have year-to-year contracts with no provision for severance pay. Especially the assistants. The ISU athletic coaching staff is a pretty small group, and when a new boss comes in and changes dozens and dozens of people's lives, uproots families, makes kids leave schools and move, etc., what happens to the ones who get left behind? The same thing that happens when an ax man appears and guts any business or other organization. They don't know who is next, they worry if one bad season will be the end of them, and they end up looking for a better workplace.
For one, I cannot stand the way Pollard appears to be shocked and hurt whenever a coach quits on him. After he just fired dozens of their colleagues, he's either acting or a fool if he thinks it doesn't work both ways. We'd just better hope that Bill Fennelly and Christy Johnson don't tell him they're outta here one of these days. I never expected them too, but after this week I won't be surprised if it happens, either.
Gene Smith, 1993-2000. 7 years, 6 NCAA's, 1 bowl game. Revenue sports postseason participation 50%. Good. Bruce Vandevelde, 2000-20005. 5 years, 4 bowl games, 2 NCAA's, 2 NIT's. Postseason participation 80%. Better. Jamie Pollard, 2005-. 4 years. 1 bowl game, 0 NCAA's, 0 NIT's. Postseason participation: 13%. The next big step. My ignore list: splitidentity, tarheelhawk,superdorf, clones_jer. That is all. -
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by MontyBurns You reap what you sow. Jamie came in and in two years fired ten coaching staffs. Not ten coaches, ten staffs. That is a lot of people and families -- and outside of the football staff and the million bucks he paid to Wayne Morgan, most of them do not have large incomes and most of them only have year-to-year contracts with no provision for severance pay. Especially the assistants. The ISU athletic coaching staff is a pretty small group, and when a new boss comes in and changes dozens and dozens of people's lives, uproots families, makes kids leave schools and move, etc., what happens to the ones who get left behind? The same thing that happens when an ax man appears and guts any business or other organization. They don't know who is next, they worry if one bad season will be the end of them, and they end up looking for a better workplace.
For one, I cannot stand the way Pollard appears to be shocked and hurt whenever a coach quits on him. After he just fired dozens of their colleagues, he's either acting or a fool if he thinks it doesn't work both ways. We'd just better hope that Bill Fennelly and Christy Johnson don't tell him they're outta here one of these days. I never expected them too, but after this week I won't be surprised if it happens, either. uggghhhhhh....
Now that MBB is back, do we still have to pretend that WBB matters?
- acgclone -
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by MontyBurns You reap what you sow. Jamie came in and in two years fired ten coaching staffs. Not ten coaches, ten staffs. That is a lot of people and families -- and outside of the football staff and the million bucks he paid to Wayne Morgan, most of them do not have large incomes and most of them only have year-to-year contracts with no provision for severance pay. Especially the assistants. The ISU athletic coaching staff is a pretty small group, and when a new boss comes in and changes dozens and dozens of people's lives, uproots families, makes kids leave schools and move, etc., what happens to the ones who get left behind? The same thing that happens when an ax man appears and guts any business or other organization. They don't know who is next, they worry if one bad season will be the end of them, and they end up looking for a better workplace.
For one, I cannot stand the way Pollard appears to be shocked and hurt whenever a coach quits on him. After he just fired dozens of their colleagues, he's either acting or a fool if he thinks it doesn't work both ways. We'd just better hope that Bill Fennelly and Christy Johnson don't tell him they're outta here one of these days. I never expected them too, but after this week I won't be surprised if it happens, either.
College athletics is more of a business than it ever has been. Yeah, it sucks that stuff has to happen, but that is the risk you take when you decide to make coaching a profession. I think any coach that is being paid enough to make a living (and often times a very good one) would tell you they understand.
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
@LeSchmick
XBox Live: Le Schmick -
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
All 3 depending on the situation, not all for all those reasons though...
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
How I see it:
Wayne Morgan had to go--no discipline, recruiting scandals, etc.
McCarney had to go--the alumni forced Pollard's cards. Chizik is now a verb for screwing someone at ISU.
Rhoads is a good coach and too bad he wasn't Dan's replacement.
Cael is a Chizik and his position turned because no one at ISU thought he was a Chizik.
The track position has resulted in great improvements overall. Deny that?
This thread and thinking is just total ******** in my opinion.
ISU was small potatoes in the Big XII and the NCAA unless someone makes a run at being more. Pollard is doing that and its a high risk proposition that a lot of people decided made sense. If they hadn't, Pollard wouldn't have taken the job. If you want to remain small potatoes, you have the wrong guy. Is that what you want?
Think before you drink. It's not noon yet.
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by wiscocyclone How I see it:
Wayne Morgan had to go--no discipline, recruiting scandals, etc.
McCarney had to go--the alumni forced Pollard's cards. Chizik is now a verb for screwing someone at ISU.
Rhoads is a good coach and too bad he wasn't Dan's replacement.
Cael is a Chizik and his position turned because no one at ISU thought he was a Chizik.
The track position has resulted in great improvements overall. Deny that?
This thread and thinking is just total ******** in my opinion.
ISU was small potatoes in the Big XII and the NCAA unless someone makes a run at being more. Pollard is doing that and its a high risk proposition that a lot of people decided made sense. If they hadn't, Pollard wouldn't have taken the job. If you want to remain small potatoes, you have the wrong guy. Is that what you want?
Think before you drink. It's not noon yet.
I think it is a bit premature to say that the track and field program has had great improvement. At the Indoor Conference championships, we finished 9th (Men) and 11th (women). I was at the Drake Relays on Saturday and sat with a former Cyclone letterwinner for Bill Bergan and he was very dissappointed. Hopefully things are changing for the better, but the results on the track aren't there, yet.
Yes, Lisa Koll is a nice story, but that is one runner.
-
Recruit
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by drlove I think it is a bit premature to say that the track and field program has had great improvement. At the Indoor Conference championships, we finished 9th (Men) and 11th (women). I was at the Drake Relays on Saturday and sat with a former Cyclone letterwinner for Bill Bergan and he was very dissappointed. Hopefully things are changing for the better, but the results on the track aren't there, yet. If Cory Ihmels is indeed a good coach (and I think he is), we don't have a prayer of keeping him either if we don't build an acceptable outdoor track. How many years since we even hosted an outdoor meet?
It is shameful that even tiny high schools in Iowa have better outdoor track facilities than Iowa State.
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by wiscocyclone How I see it:
Wayne Morgan had to go--no discipline, recruiting scandals, etc.
Think before you drink. It's not noon yet.
What scandals? I was screwed.
Signed,
Your eternal Servant
Wayne Dish
Really, Wayne was booted because we wanted Larry E results and then received McD results in the end.
Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style. -
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
Same reason Johnny Majors, Earl Bruce and Tim Floyd left: B.
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by wiscocyclone ISU was small potatoes in the Big XII and the NCAA unless someone makes a run at being more. Pollard is doing that and its a high risk proposition that a lot of people decided made sense. If they hadn't, Pollard wouldn't have taken the job. If you want to remain small potatoes, you have the wrong guy. Is that what you want? I don't doubt that JP really wants to raise ISU to another level in the Big XII and I do think he's done a good job on what he has to work with (small budget, facilities, etc...).
I think the most difficult thing for me is understanding *why* he does some things the way he does, and that is most likely stems from differences in personality more than anything. I know I couldn't do his job, so I have to trust he knows what he's doing, even if I don't always agree.  Originally Posted by Tornado man If Cory Ihmels is indeed a good coach (and I think he is), we don't have a prayer of keeping him either if we don't build an acceptable outdoor track. How many years since we even hosted an outdoor meet?
It is shameful that even tiny high schools in Iowa have better outdoor track facilities than Iowa State. Agree. I think he has some good assistants, too (though I'm a bit biased as I know one personally).
-
Re: Why have all these coaches left?
 Originally Posted by Wesley What scandals? I was screwed.
Signed,
Your eternal Servant
Wayne Dish
Really, Wayne was booted because we wanted Larry E results and then received McD results in the end. The scandal was a joke.
 Originally Posted by MNCyGuy The only answer to "who/what is GeronimusClone?" is in fact "GeronimousClone". You're like The Todd on Scrubs.  Originally Posted by Angie This is why you're my favorite  Originally Posted by MoreCowbell GC, he's obviously all man. And I don't think Ellen would go *****, even for GC...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks