If more than 1 of our current players are starting next year....

**acgclone** · 02-19-2011, 02:50 PM

we're going to be very disappointed again.

Scotty..... one-dimensional 3-pt shooter, too slow to defend and give you anything other than set 3's. Hopefully he can give us 10-15 min and some good 3 looks next year.

Ejim/Godfrey/Railey..... should be a pretty good threesome as JR/SR's, but hopefully we don't count on any of these guys to give us more than 20 min/game because they're still a ways out from being able to star in the B12.

Bubu....same problem as Scotty, minus the 3

**snowcraig2.0** · 02-19-2011, 02:51 PM

Are you serious? This team is one player away from being on the NCAA tourney bubble. Stupid post.

**Drive4cy** · 02-19-2011, 02:51 PM

I won't be mad if Ejim or Godfrey start. Godfrey is undersized but he's a tremendous athlete.

I don't see how Scotty will start, unless there's an injury or something else unforeseen.

**gocubs2118** · 02-19-2011, 02:52 PM

Ejim is a must start.

**snowcraig2.0** · 02-19-2011, 02:54 PM

If we stick with a 3 guard lineup, Scotty will start, no question. If we go to a more traditional 3 guard lineup, then I could see Scotty coming off the bench.

**GoSTATE71** · 02-19-2011, 02:54 PM

Yeah well, Scott is a good player

The same scott that scored 30 against Iowa, scored 20+ in big 12 play what 3 or 4 times? Yeah his shots werent falling today but hes a good player your a idiot
Also Ejim and Godfrey are great players, who else got offensive rebounds today? barely anyone. There both awesome athletes and I'd be fine with either one of them playing big minutes, Railey brings intensity and a chip on his shoulder, he gets ****** off when he gets pushed around and you can tell, JVB just takes it like a little girl

**cyclonepower** · 02-19-2011, 02:54 PM

ejim OR godfrey start, other than that I would say no...

**Yes13** · 02-19-2011, 02:54 PM

Originally Posted by snowcraig2.0

Are you serious? This team is one player away from being on the NCAA tourney bubble. Stupid post.

Unless that player was shaq in his prime, this was a stupid post.

I wouldn't mind if Ejim or Godfrey are starting, but I definitely want Scotty to come off the bench.

**Judoka** · 02-19-2011, 02:55 PM

How many games have we lost in the last minute by just a few points?

We are 1-2 players away from being in the top 1/4 of the conference. I am not sure how many of the current players will start next year, but it's not like we aren't holding our own in just about every game, we just need some more guys to get over the hump.

**cyclonepower** · 02-19-2011, 02:56 PM

Originally Posted by Judoka

How many games have we lost in the last minute by just a few points?

We are 1-2 players away from being in the top 1/4 of the conference. I am not sure how many of the current players will start next year, but it's not like we aren't holding our own in just about every game, we just need some more guys to get over the hump.

2 players is about half the starting line up

**Yes13** · 02-19-2011, 02:56 PM

Originally Posted by snowcraig2.0

If we stick with a 3 guard lineup, Scotty will start, no question. If we go to a more traditional 3 guard lineup, then I could see Scotty coming off the bench.

I'm fine with Scotty, but if he's still starting it means our incoming guards are dissapointing.

McGee, Allen, Babb.

**heitclone** · 02-19-2011, 02:57 PM

Originally Posted by snowcraig2.0

If we stick with a 3 guard lineup, Scotty will start, no question. If we go to a more traditional 3 guard lineup, then I could see Scotty coming off the bench.

I think either would be just fine, Scotty isn't the most versatile player but lets not forget that he's shown he can win a game almost single handedly, but his looks are going to come from the guys around him showing they can be a threat too.

**snowcraig2.0** · 02-19-2011, 02:57 PM

Originally Posted by Yes13

Unless that player was shaq in his prime, this was a stupid post.

I wouldn't mind if Ejim or Godfrey are starting, but I definitely want Scotty to come off the bench.

Are you kidding? All but 2 of our loses have been very close. One player could easily mean 5 or 6 more wins for this team. I am as bummed as anyone, but you are being an idiot with this ****.

**TitanClone** · 02-19-2011, 03:00 PM

Originally Posted by Yes13

Unless that player was shaq in his prime, this was a stupid post.

I wouldn't mind if Ejim or Godfrey are starting, but I definitely want Scotty to come off the bench.

Think about how many games we've been close and lose at the end. It's called fatigue. One more player would make a huge difference.

**alarson** · 02-19-2011, 03:00 PM

Originally Posted by Yes13

Unless that player was shaq in his prime, this was a stupid post.

How's that? If we're just a couple points better in every game, we win a lot more games. Even one more player at the level of our current starters wouldve helped that by letting us spread out the minutes a bit more so we'd be a bit less gassed at the end of our games.

I dont know about tourney as the pessimist in me says not all would go that way, but definitely could have a lot more wins.