Jake Anderson 2.0?

**ItsCyence** · 03-21-2011, 09:23 PM

If ISU goes after him and can get him it would be awesome. La. Tech wasn't that bad of a team and when I watched them play a couple games this year this guy stood out.

**thatguy** · 03-21-2011, 09:31 PM

i wonder if he can Mayor coach?

**jsb** · 03-21-2011, 09:37 PM

Would be a pretty perfect situation. I'm not sure that we need another forward, but for one year who cares? Probably better than banking it.

**Wesley** · 03-21-2011, 09:48 PM

He is from Toronto. He would fit right in.

**RustShack** · 03-21-2011, 09:54 PM

To many forwards seems like a good problem to me... especially with the up tempo style we have switched too. The more depth the better!

**Cydkar** · 03-21-2011, 10:38 PM

Originally Posted by ISU BET

but you said you were Fred

I see that you have been paying attention, number one son.

**Skyh13** · 03-22-2011, 12:12 AM

Originally Posted by thatguy

i wonder if he can Mayor coach?

I think you just blew my mind...

**CyberJJJ** · 03-22-2011, 01:58 AM

Originally Posted by cycfan1

This would be better than JUCO big. One year so it sets us up for 2012. Gives us added depth for next year instead of banking the extra scholly.

I was referring to something I heard one of the assistant's say.

**acody** · 03-22-2011, 02:22 AM

Originally Posted by Cydkar

Ashaolu Named to NABC all-District Team - Louisiana Tech Official Athletic Site

Rumor is that he's leaving La. Tech after graduation and has a year left. Somebody let Fred know.

Actually, Iowa should go after him. They need inside help.

I do not have any interest in what Iowa needs!!!

**Tillweezy** · 03-22-2011, 12:25 PM

This would be a great addition. It would give the coaching staff the choice of red-shirting
Railey. With a year and a half of development, Railey could be darn good come the 2012-2013 season. Note, he would only be a sophomore too.

**cayin** · 03-22-2011, 02:07 PM

Originally Posted by Tillweezy

This would be a great addition. It would give the coaching staff the choice of red-shirting
Railey. With a year and a half of development, Railey could be darn good come the 2012-2013 season. Note, he would only be a sophomore too.

Well, we may need Railey next year. We are going to come across teams with some 6'11 guys.

**clone52** · 03-22-2011, 02:44 PM

Originally Posted by cayin

Well, we may need Railey next year. We are going to come across teams with some 6'11 guys.

We came across teams with 6'11 guys last year and Railey was only used as a last resort for foul trouble.

If we get this post player, Railey would be option #5 and redshirting would be the best option for him. If we don't get him, we probably need Railey, although with Ejim having experience at the 4, you could argue that he could be redshirted as well.

**State43** · 03-22-2011, 03:06 PM

They would not redshirt railey. He would transfer if that was the case.

**clone52** · 03-22-2011, 03:08 PM

Originally Posted by State43

They would not redshirt railey. He would transfer if that was the case.

Well duh. Any talk of redshirting is under the implied assumption that the player in question would be willing to redshirt.

While most players probably don't want to redshirt, there may be some that are okay with it. Unless you have inside information, you don't know which category Railey falls into.