-
Should we start going after Woodbury again?
According to a tweet I saw, UNC and Kansas are now showing interest in him. With the loss of Godfrey, I think we should take a serious look at him. Adam Woodbury - Yahoo! Sports -
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
Because we all know that ISU is a more attractive option than UNC & Kansas   Originally Posted by AltHawk Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT. -
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
If we stopped recruiting him, as has been reported, then the cows are already out of the barn.
"Missouri is free to create an enduring basketball rivalry with Auburn." -
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by Cydkar If we stopped recruiting him, as has been reported, then the cows are already out of the barn. Well they can be swayed back in with good feed or a big storm.
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by bos Well they can be swayed back in with good feed or a big storm. If Kansas and UNC are truly interested, then we're all SOL. ISU and Iowa don't have much to offer that would sway the cows back into the barn in that case.
 “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011
“With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan.  ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011
“He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011 -
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by tm3308 If Kansas and UNC are truly interested, then we're all SOL. ISU and Iowa don't have much to offer that would sway the cows back into the barn in that case. Im betting Iowa and ISU can offer more playing time than those two. He is a good player, but he isnt Harrison Barnes. I highly doubt he will be a starter right away for either of those schools
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by bpmcclain Im betting Iowa and ISU can offer more playing time than those two. He is a good player, but he isnt Harrison Barnes. I highly doubt he will be a starter right away for either of those schools Please incorporate cow/barn analogy into your responses. Thank you.
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by bos Please incorporate cow/barn analogy into your responses. Thank you. Iowa and ISU will have more milk to offer than UNC or Kansas
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by bpmcclain Im betting Iowa and ISU can offer more playing time than those two. He is a good player, but he isnt Harrison Barnes. I highly doubt he will be a starter right away for either of those schools And there are plenty of ****** programs across the country who can offer him THAT. Very rarely do players with offers from schools like that go to programs that are in the shape of ISU and Iowa right now. They just don't.
Last edited by LindenCy; 05-10-2011 at 06:50 PM.
 “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011
“With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan.  ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011
“He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011 -
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by bpmcclain Im betting Iowa and ISU can offer more playing time than those two. He is a good player, but he isnt Harrison Barnes. I highly doubt he will be a starter right away for either of those schools  Originally Posted by bos Please incorporate cow/barn analogy into your responses. Thank you. He did.
 Originally Posted by azn4cy On the bright side, if you get stung by jellyfish, and TruClone is around, you're golden... literally. -
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
I saw him play a few times. IMO, he's a project.
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
I don't really see what one has to do with the other. Their games are completely different.
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
Something I've found too, is just because a kid lists he has interest in a school, it doesn't mean the school is seriously interested.
I've seen football recruiting profiles where the teams listed are like USC, Texas, etc., and the kid gets offered at Tulsa or Tulane or something.
If the staff figures he isn't a fit, then he isn't a fit. Doesn't matter if another team wants him.
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
I certainly don't claim to be able to spot high level college basketball talent, but after seeing Woodbury play in Des Moines against Ankeny, I can't imagine the guy would ever be a star player on a D2 team let alone D1.
I saw Woodbury as a Jordan Egleseader type player, and that is putting it nicely.
-
Re: Should we start going after Woodbury again?
 Originally Posted by Cyclone06 I certainly don't claim to be able to spot high level college basketball talent, but after seeing Woodbury play in Des Moines against Ankeny, I can't imagine the guy would ever be a star player on a D2 team let alone D1.
I saw Woodbury as a Jordan Egleseader type player, and that is putting it nicely.
He has improved since March, especially on offense, and playing with Marcus Paige on the AAU circuit makes him much more productive. He is a legit high major prospect.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks