-
Were Not just a PG away..
Everyone has been stating how needy we are for a PG but in my opinion we also need a center. If we had a center that could play on the inside just for rebounding it would allow royce white to move to the 4 which is clearly his natural position, and also move Ejim out to the 3 where he is clearly a natural for.
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
Royce is a big boy, but he's no center. He needs to be at PF.
"Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." † -
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by cyhawk55 Everyone has been stating how needy we are for a PG but in my opinion we also need a center. If we had a center that could play on the inside just for rebounding it would allow royce white to move to the 4 which is clearly his natural position, and also move Ejim out to the 3 where he is clearly a natural for. You realize that Railey has been suspended, right?
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
I think Railey will help out the **** poor perimeter defense we displayed last night. If you have a near 7 footer sitting under the rim, it allows more room for error.
I don't bring my own opinions, just attack others.  -
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
Royce is about 6'7/270 even undersized with length for the NBA PF but certainly great for ISU. I like Booker at the 5 with Royce. The issue IMO is a lack of glue guys and role players. Plenty of guys that want to score the ball though. I'm excited to have talent on the team again. Certainly excited about the one/two punch of White/Clyburn next year, but I am concerned we won't have the glue guys to go around them. The PG situation fixes itself next year with Lucious.
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by defensewins Royce is about 6'7/270 even undersized with length for the NBA PF but certainly great for ISU. I like Booker at the 5 with Royce. The issue IMO is a lack of glue guys and role players. Plenty of guys that want to score the ball though. I'm excited to have talent on the team again. Certainly excited about the one/two punch of White/Clyburn next year, but I am concerned we won't have the glue guys to go around them. The PG situation fixes itself next year with Lucious. Why do you think Lucious is the answer at PG?
"But you know that old thing, live fast, die young? Not my way. Live fast, sure, live too bloody fast sometimes, but die young? Die old. That's the way- not orthodox, I don't live by "the rules" you know." - David Brent -
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by chuckd4735 You realize that Railey has been suspended, right? Skogland was 7' too
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by rholtgraves Why do you think Lucious is the answer at PG? r u srs? he's got to be better than "random shooting guard to dribble up court, and look lost"
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
If we were a center away Fred Hoiberg would have recruited a center at some point in the history of him coaching here, but he hasn't. It is not in his plan to have a true center. /thread
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by ajk4st8 Skogland was 7' too Well Railey actually played last season, and from everything I have seen, the coaching staff feels he has made great progression into this season.
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by jahfg I think Railey will help out the **** poor perimeter defense we displayed last night. If you have a near 7 footer sitting under the rim, it allows more room for error. If I were Hoiberg, I might start Railey just to prove a point.
...and also to try anything different. Give Melvin a break and a chance to come off the bench.
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
It sounds silly, but a Point Guard literally would solve just about everything. And I'm not being sarcastic, at all.
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by CloneState1028 It sounds silly, but a Point Guard literally would solve just about everything. And I'm not being sarcastic, at all. Really? Because our biggest problem right now is our defensive strategy. Unless the pg is going to game plan with Fred, we're still going to have problems.
-
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
 Originally Posted by ajk4st8 Skogland was 7' too Having watched both those players, do you think you're making a point or just being an ***?
I don't bring my own opinions, just attack others.  -
Re: Were Not just a PG away..
Point being how does adding a very average big help anything? Just because he is tall?
Like Justin Hamilton?
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68C9L4SPud8[/ame]
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks