Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 42
  1. #16
    Addict
    Points: 72,585, Level: 83
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 565
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chicago, Il
    Posts
    5,689
    Points
    72,585
    Level
    83

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by MookInLincoln View Post
    As a 7-10 seed, there will be no possible second round matchup that is good for us. Take your pick from this list ...

    Syracuse, Kentucky, UNC, Duke, Ohio State, Michigan State

    Count me in as someone that would be very happy with an 11 seed.
    I wouldn't mind an 11. It probably won't happen, but I wouldn't be upset with it if that means we don't have to face a 1 or 2 if we win the first game.

    I would take on Duke or Ohio State though if I had a choice. Maybe Michigan State on the fringe, but probably not. Sullinger vs. White would be interesting. Sullinger is a dough boy and can't jump.

  2. #17
    Legend
    Points: 249,931, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    14,655
    Points
    249,931
    Level
    100

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    I think we're pretty much locked into the 8-9 game but I could see us being a 7 as well. With the loss last night, we gained another RPI top 50 win since Texas moved up too 44 after beating us. Not many teams have that many.

  3. #18
    Speechless
    Points: 429,991, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    28,672
    Points
    429,991
    Level
    100

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Another thing to possibly keep in mind is our resume is still near-identical to Florida, which is being seeded much higher. Just because the media insists on sticking with their preconceived biases and places us in an 8-9 game doesn't necessarily mean the committee is going to think the same way.
    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.



  4. #19
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 52,421, Level: 70
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 129
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    3,895
    Points
    52,421
    Level
    70

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Another thing to possibly keep in mind is our resume is still near-identical to Florida, which is being seeded much higher. Just because the media insists on sticking with their preconceived biases and places us in an 8-9 game doesn't necessarily mean the committee is going to think the same way.
    Very good point.

  5. #20
    Hall-Of-Famer Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Clone5 View Post
    Can't think of a better team to play in the first round or a worse team to play in the second round.
    +1
    "Not at the table Carlos."

  6. #21
    Legend
    Points: 249,931, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    14,655
    Points
    249,931
    Level
    100

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Another thing to possibly keep in mind is our resume is still near-identical to Florida, which is being seeded much higher. Just because the media insists on sticking with their preconceived biases and places us in an 8-9 game doesn't necessarily mean the committee is going to think the same way.
    Yep, that's why I could see us seeded anywhere from 6-9. Just compare us and Vanderbilt, it very similar. Most have them as a 6 seed.

  7. #22
    Walk On
    Points: 7,161, Level: 25
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 389
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    141
    Points
    7,161
    Level
    25

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    I think we will do better in the NCAA tournament first, because we now will have time to rest and get refocused. And second because these teams don't know us as well. The round robin schedule of the Big 12 has let teams get to scout us twice and in Texas' case three times. Will Purdue know in detail that Allen can light it up if left wide open it or just how good Royce can see the floor without ever playing us?

  8. #23
    All-Star
    Points: 28,636, Level: 51
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 14
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,873
    Points
    28,636
    Level
    51

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    [QUOTE=marothisu;2743230]I told my Purdue friend, and already he's like

    I would think maybe two years ago, but not after the knee problems.

  9. #24
    All-Star
    Points: 35,449, Level: 57
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 1
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,092
    Points
    35,449
    Level
    57

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Another thing to possibly keep in mind is our resume is still near-identical to Florida, which is being seeded much higher. Just because the media insists on sticking with their preconceived biases and places us in an 8-9 game doesn't necessarily mean the committee is going to think the same way.
    Completely agree. Florida is a 6 seed on a 3 game losing streak and currently only up by 2 at the half against Alabama. Record wise we are also almost the exact same we Florida State and they are a 4-5 seed. Though they do have a high SOS but similar RPI.

    I think we will get a 7-9 seed but I wouldn't be shocked if we got a 6. There are a bunch of mid majors in the 7 and 6 seeds that could get bumped to an 8 or 9 depending on how the committee sees them.

  10. #25
    Legend
    Points: 249,931, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    14,655
    Points
    249,931
    Level
    100

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    I just compared our resume to everyone of the 6 seeds from this mornings bracketology and there isn't much of a difference between them, if any at all. The only team that has more RPI top 50 wins than us is Notre Dame and they have only one more.

  11. #26
    All-Star
    Points: 28,636, Level: 51
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 14
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,873
    Points
    28,636
    Level
    51

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    In my mind, generally the difference between 6-10 seeds isn't that great. Regarding FSU, they do have better wins than us.

  12. #27
    All-Star
    Points: 28,636, Level: 51
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 14
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,873
    Points
    28,636
    Level
    51

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    In my mind, generally the difference between 6-10 seeds isn't that great. Regarding FSU, they do have better wins than us.

  13. #28
    All-Star
    Points: 21,057, Level: 44
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 593
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cymaniac17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Frick Park Market
    Posts
    1,386
    Points
    21,057
    Level
    44

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by BeTheCyclone View Post
    I think we will do better in the NCAA tournament first, because we now will have time to rest and get refocused. And second because these teams don't know us as well. The round robin schedule of the Big 12 has let teams get to scout us twice and in Texas' case three times. Will Purdue know in detail that Allen can light it up if left wide open it or just how good Royce can see the floor without ever playing us?
    I think a big 10 team will Know all about chris allen...

  14. #29
    Rookie
    Points: 19,497, Level: 42
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 353
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience Points1 year registered
    cychosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    406
    Points
    19,497
    Level
    42

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Of the 59 brackets updated 3/9 on the Bracket Matrix we are averaging a 7.97 seed.

    Seed - # of Brackets
    5-1
    6-0
    7-9
    8-40
    9-8
    10-1

    The Bracket Project's Bracket Matrix - 2012

  15. #30
    Walk On
    Points: 7,161, Level: 25
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 389
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    141
    Points
    7,161
    Level
    25

    Re: 3-9-2012 Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by cymaniac17 View Post
    I think a big 10 team will Know all about chris allen...
    True. However it was 2 years ago, different system, different players. Plus if I saw tape of last night I wouldn't be as concerned about him. But point taken about Big 10 teams.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19