I still find it quite odd that they used the video replay to determine whether to give him a T. That seems to open up a whole new world of regulation.
Printable View
I still find it quite odd that they used the video replay to determine whether to give him a T. That seems to open up a whole new world of regulation.
Or punishing the guy that wasn't on Kansas.Quote:
Originally Posted by WooClone15
Yeah you're right. In most other cases I'd say it's a case of punishing the player who responds. In this case it probably is because he didn't play for kansasQuote:
Originally Posted by ISUCubswin
Perfect! "Fikken Sie!"Quote:
Originally Posted by theshadow
Reason for edit: To see if it passed the CycloneFanatic "*" filter! It did! So it's perfectly acceptable in a game!
Oh come on, everybody in the conference knows that Hilton "Magic" is code for getting bent over by the refs.Quote:
Originally Posted by WooClone15
Obvious KU troll is obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChampFantana
Why are you being respectful? I'd go with Fick Dich!Quote:
Originally Posted by TXCyclones
Everybody seems fixated on the wrong part of the NCAA rules. Here is the part specifically on player (and substitute player) technicals. The other part is on the bench (coaches). See B.
Section 5. (Men) CLASS A Unsporting Technical InfractionsArt. 1.A player or substitute committing an unsportsmanlike act including, butnot limited to, the following:a. Disrespectfully addressing or contacting an official or gesturing in such amanner as to indicate resentment.b. Using profanity or vulgarity; taunting, baiting or ridiculing another playeror bench personnel; or pointing a finger at or making obscene gesturestoward another player or bench personnel.c. Inciting undesirable crowd reaction.d. Contacting an opponent, while the ball is dead, in an unnecessary,unacceptable and excessive manner.e. Flagrantly (severe or extreme) contacting an opponent while the ball isdead.f. A flagrant noncontact infraction that involves extreme, sometimespersistent, vulgar, abusive conduct when the ball is dead or live.g. Participating after having been disqualified (noncontact flagrant 2technical).h. Leaving the playing court and going into the stands when a fight maybreak out or has broken out (flagrant noncontact infraction).i. Fighting as in Rule 4-26.
Agreed, basketball has too many judgement calls to expand replay much more than it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycsk
The Big 12 officials have enough chances to make calls for KU while the clock is running without stopping the game to do it in addition to that.
Get back to us when ISU hits a three pointer during half time or warmups and the refs put it on the board. That's KU's exclusive level of the Big 12 being fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChampFantana
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloClone
This seems like the more relevant rule, but it doesn't address why and how they are dialing up the implementation this year. Seems like there may be some unwritten rules that refs are supposed to enforce, like the rushing the lane violations which was a big deal at the beginning of March Madness last year, but tapered off by the end.
In case anyone has forgotten:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QblPO0qijJA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISUCubswin
Morgan earned a few T's for his language in that video. In fact, I think he should have sent an assistant to go ballistic and get kicked out in order to draw more attention to the flagrant score-keeping mistake.
Guys his mom is on here... lets not be THOSE guys.
"like" wasn't the right thing for that. I want to rep the phantom 3, but I have to spread it around. Amazing find.