Niang's technical

**Cycsk** · 01-10-2013, 04:30 PM

I still find it quite odd that they used the video replay to determine whether to give him a T. That seems to open up a whole new world of regulation.

**ISUCubswin** · 01-10-2013, 04:30 PM

Originally Posted by WooClone15

Probably a case of punishing the guy who responds.

Or punishing the guy that wasn't on Kansas.

**WooClone15** · 01-10-2013, 04:54 PM

Originally Posted by ISUCubswin

Or punishing the guy that wasn't on Kansas.

Yeah you're right. In most other cases I'd say it's a case of punishing the player who responds. In this case it probably is because he didn't play for kansas

**TXCyclones** · 01-10-2013, 04:57 PM

Originally Posted by theshadow

Just teach the players to curse in foreign languages. Where's Martin Rancik when you need him?

Perfect! "Fikken Sie!"

Reason for edit: To see if it passed the CycloneFanatic "*" filter! It did! So it's perfectly acceptable in a game!

**ChampFantana** · 01-10-2013, 04:57 PM

Originally Posted by WooClone15

Yeah you're right. In most other cases I'd say it's a case of punishing the player who responds. In this case it probably is because he didn't play for kansas

Oh come on, everybody in the conference knows that Hilton "Magic" is code for getting bent over by the refs.

**IHavNoCyCash** · 01-10-2013, 04:59 PM

Originally Posted by ChampFantana

Oh come on, everybody in the conference knows that Hilton "Magic" is code for getting bent over by the refs.

Obvious KU troll is obvious.

**WooClone15** · 01-10-2013, 05:04 PM

Originally Posted by TXCyclones

Perfect! "Fikken Sie!"

Reason for edit: To see if it passed the CycloneFanatic "*" filter! It did! So it's perfectly acceptable in a game!

Why are you being respectful? I'd go with Fick Dich!

**VeloClone** · 01-10-2013, 05:04 PM

Everybody seems fixated on the wrong part of the NCAA rules. Here is the part specifically on player (and substitute player) technicals. The other part is on the bench (coaches). See B.

Section 5. (Men) CLASS A Unsporting Technical Infractions

Art. 1.

A player or substitute committing an unsportsmanlike act including, butnot limited to, the following:a. Disrespectfully addressing or contacting an official or gesturing in such amanner as to indicate resentment.b. Using profanity or vulgarity; taunting, baiting or ridiculing another playeror bench personnel; or pointing a finger at or making obscene gesturestoward another player or bench personnel.c. Inciting undesirable crowd reaction.d. Contacting an opponent, while the ball is dead, in an unnecessary,unacceptable and excessive manner.e. Flagrantly (severe or extreme) contacting an opponent while the ball isdead.f. A flagrant noncontact infraction that involves extreme, sometimespersistent, vulgar, abusive conduct when the ball is dead or live.g. Participating after having been disqualified (noncontact flagrant 2technical).h. Leaving the playing court and going into the stands when a fight maybreak out or has broken out (flagrant noncontact infraction).

i. Fighting as in Rule 4-26.

**HFCS** · 01-10-2013, 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by Cycsk

I still find it quite odd that they used the video replay to determine whether to give him a T. That seems to open up a whole new world of regulation.

Agreed, basketball has too many judgement calls to expand replay much more than it is.

The Big 12 officials have enough chances to make calls for KU while the clock is running without stopping the game to do it in addition to that.

**HFCS** · 01-10-2013, 05:36 PM

Originally Posted by ChampFantana

Oh come on, everybody in the conference knows that Hilton "Magic" is code for getting bent over by the refs.

Get back to us when ISU hits a three pointer during half time or warmups and the refs put it on the board. That's KU's exclusive level of the Big 12 being fixed.

**Cycsk** · 01-10-2013, 06:11 PM

Originally Posted by VeloClone

Everybody seems fixated on the wrong part of the NCAA rules. Here is the part specifically on player (and substitute player) technicals. The other part is on the bench (coaches). See B.

Section 5. (Men) CLASS A Unsporting Technical Infractions

Art. 1.

A player or substitute committing an unsportsmanlike act including, butnot limited to, the following:a. Disrespectfully addressing or contacting an official or gesturing in such amanner as to indicate resentment.b. Using profanity or vulgarity; taunting, baiting or ridiculing another playeror bench personnel; or pointing a finger at or making obscene gesturestoward another player or bench personnel.c. Inciting undesirable crowd reaction.d. Contacting an opponent, while the ball is dead, in an unnecessary,unacceptable and excessive manner.e. Flagrantly (severe or extreme) contacting an opponent while the ball isdead.f. A flagrant noncontact infraction that involves extreme, sometimespersistent, vulgar, abusive conduct when the ball is dead or live.g. Participating after having been disqualified (noncontact flagrant 2technical).h. Leaving the playing court and going into the stands when a fight maybreak out or has broken out (flagrant noncontact infraction).

i. Fighting as in Rule 4-26.

This seems like the more relevant rule, but it doesn't address why and how they are dialing up the implementation this year. Seems like there may be some unwritten rules that refs are supposed to enforce, like the rushing the lane violations which was a big deal at the beginning of March Madness last year, but tapered off by the end.

**ISUCubswin** · 01-10-2013, 06:14 PM

In case anyone has forgotten:

**Cycsk** · 01-10-2013, 06:20 PM

Originally Posted by ISUCubswin

In case anyone has forgotten:

Morgan earned a few T's for his language in that video. In fact, I think he should have sent an assistant to go ballistic and get kicked out in order to draw more attention to the flagrant score-keeping mistake.