330Likes -
02-05-2013, 03:49 PM #211
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by Cydkar I'll never understand the discussion of matchups based on bracketology at this point of the year. I understand the "will we get in?" discussion but not the "who we might play" discussion. For that matter, I don't think a lot of bracketologists care about taking the time to make sure their brackets follow all the matchup rules at this time of the year. Lunardi's usually pretty good about it, though.
-
02-05-2013, 03:51 PM #212
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by Gunnerclone Lol, pretty much the same analysis he had until March last year. What a dork.
"A true Cyclone never roots against the Cyclones"  -
02-05-2013, 03:51 PM #213
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by CYUL8R So with us getting a win Saturday (I'm confident...so sue me) what seed do we move up to? 7? 6?
I think 7 sounds reasonable only because that Tech loss will still have some lingering stench. Sure be nice to have a sweep of a top 15 ranked team. Think he bumps us up to 8 at the highest. Still need a road win to get into the 6/7 range.
Beating KState would probably do it.
-
02-05-2013, 03:58 PM #214
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by Gunnerclone Apparently he frowns upon defending your home court...
-
02-05-2013, 04:05 PM #215
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
Just reopen that link and look at it so you can see Memphis above ISU and UK below ISU. Look at the breakdown of games vs. various RPI's. Why is ISU in the same conversation with those two teams???
"There are five real good recruits in the state. We got three of them. One couldn’t get into school, and the other went to (the University of) Iowa...which is about the same thing." - Coach Johnny Orr -
02-05-2013, 10:20 PM #216
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
Stick a fork in Witchita State. They lost to Southern Illinois, their second conference win. Looks like Creighton may be it from MVC. Indiana State has 8 losses.
Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style. -
02-05-2013, 11:05 PM #217
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
Indiana reclaims No. 1 seed in latest Bracket Watch - College Basketball - Andy Glockner - SI.com
Sports Illustrated has us as a 7 seed!
Don't give up on Wichita State. I think they still get in, but the loss to SIU is bad.
-
02-06-2013, 12:46 AM #218
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
NCAA Tournament Bracket Projections: Feb. 5 | | | EAST (WASHINGTON, DC) | | WEST (LOS ANGELES) | | Auburn Hills – March 21st/23rd | | Lexington – March 21st/23rd | | 1) Michigan (20-2) | | 1) Florida (18-2) | | 16) Bryant (15-6)/Charleston Southern (12-7) | | 16) Southern (16-7)/NC Central (15-7) | | 8) Missouri (16-5) | | 8) Wichita State (19-4) | | 9) Iowa State (16-6) | | 9) Saint Louis (16-5) |
-
02-06-2013, 01:11 AM #219
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
Jerry Palm is an idiot but I do think ISU may be in some trouble if the Cyclones go 0-3 with the only three big road games left - @ KSU, @ BU, and @ OU. Have to win at LEAST one.
-
02-06-2013, 01:24 AM #220
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by IHavNoCyCash I hope that isn't the bracket. Playing Mizzou again would be kinda fun but playing Michigan in Auburn Hills sounds pretty bad.
On bracket matrix, a lot of 9 and 10 seeds. 2 have ISU as a 7. I'd love a crack Mizzou. Their good players are gone. And even though it would be another Michigan team in Ann Arbor, what is scary about Michigan, hardaway's kid, just put Babb on him and it's shutdown city.
-
02-06-2013, 01:57 AM #221
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by CycloneRulzzz I'd love a crack Mizzou. Their good players are gone. And even though it would be another Michigan team in Ann Arbor, what is scary about Michigan, hardaway's kid, just put Babb on him and it's shutdown city. Hard to contain Burke if Babb is on Hardaway. McGary and Morgan would be a handful down low and Stauskas and Robinson are quite the handful also. INCREDIBLY tough game but definitely do-able if we knock down shots early and control boards. -
02-06-2013, 06:27 AM #222
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
 Originally Posted by VeloClone Just reopen that link and look at it so you can see Memphis above ISU and UK below ISU. Look at the breakdown of games vs. various RPI's. Why is ISU in the same conversation with those two teams??? He has CSU and their #15 rpi on the bubble watch. I used to respect his fair look at all the criteria the comitte looks at but with a #15preconcussion rpi they arent getting looked at. H
-
02-06-2013, 06:32 AM #223
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
So glad we didn't play Michigan this season....
  Originally Posted by AltHawk Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT. -
02-06-2013, 06:33 AM #224
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
Oh, anyone else love going on Lunardi's bracket and asking where the hoks are? Never gets old.
  Originally Posted by AltHawk Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT. -
02-06-2013, 06:38 AM #225
Re: ***Official 2013 Bracketology Thread***
I think we can play with about anybody, Michigan at Auburn Hills=not neutral court=not good. See Larrys Mich St game for reference.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks