just seeing what everyone thinks. i always hated playing frank martin teams. dude is just intimidating and k-state always seemed to have it together with him at the helm.
Printable View
just seeing what everyone thinks. i always hated playing frank martin teams. dude is just intimidating and k-state always seemed to have it together with him at the helm.
meh, we beat them both.
Hoiberg. He is 3-0 vs them. I refuse to count Fred's first year as he was dealt a weak hand.
Time will tell. Weber is using Martin's players.
I'll face Weber 10 times out of 10 rather than Martin. His teams played dirty.
martin.
weber's only good teams at Ill were with Bill Self's recruits.
http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t...ojudsonip0.gif
Martin on left, Weber on right, not even close
I'd prefer that KSU have Weber as coach. Not that he is bad, but I think Martin would have had them stronger year in, year out.
Is this a serious question?
Weber has to be one of the top coaches when coaching other peoples talent. I think that after all Martin's recruits are gone they are going to go into massive decline. They won't be horrible but they wont be great either.
I think Martin is the better between them because he is a better recruiter and he gets them to play like their life depended on it.
I'll take Fred for the win.
Martin, though i hate his style (as with huggins) of 'they cant call em all'. I wish refs would have the balls to actually call all the fouls deserved.