 14Likes -
Why no FT's at the end?
I am confused why Babb wasnt able to shoot FT's at the end of the game. My roommate and I were talking and when somebody fouls someobdy else on an inbounds play, they get to shoot if they are in the bonus. But Babb didnt because he didnt have possession? Still confused about this. If anybody can explain, I would greatly appreciate it.
Oh well, on to Baylor. Im expecting a crazy atmosphere and a great game.
Team Vikes: 2013 CF Pickup Basketball Champions!!!
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
The refs don't know the rules evidently.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
On the Clyburn foul with no possession there were shots. On the foul against Babb there were none.
Why?
OSU was gagging on ref schlong before the game.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
The refs listened and responded to Travis Ford's ********. /thread
“I told you, I don’t care if you’re black or white. I don’t care if you’re rich or poor. I don’t care where you come from, whether it’s Texas, Florida, California, or right here in the state of Iowa, I don’t care about any of that… But what I did care about is moving forward from that day on, that we were one team." -Paul Rhoads
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
 Originally Posted by spierceisu  The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul? I'm guessing since they had the ball out of bounds, and we never gained possession, it was considered an offensive foul, much like a charge.
Now that MBB is back, do we still have to pretend that WBB matters?
- acgclone
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
I agree. They got to shoot 2 free throws when Clyburn came over back. Same play Nash came over Babbs back no free throws?
Makes no sense
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
Per some Iowa Boys Basketball officials at the bar I was at, the Babb foul with no shots was due to ISU not having "team control of the ball". As in, Oklahoma State was inbounding, Babb steps in to steal but never actual had the ball in his control when fouled.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
Babb didn't have possession of the ball, so it wasn't a back court player control foul with automatic 1&1 free throws.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
Originally Posted by CycloneKC I agree. They got to shoot 2 free throws when Clyburn came over back. Same play Nash came over Babbs back no free throws?
Makes no sense
They were in the bonus, we weren't.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
I would rather take a shot at a 3 then a 1 and 1.
The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
OSu didn't have ball yet when we shot it and Clyburn came over back.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
Originally Posted by Cycsk They were in the bonus, we weren't. That foul put ISU in the bonus.
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
My question is:
If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?
-
Re: Why no FT's at the end?
Originally Posted by xboxfever That foul put ISU in the bonus. So, the bonus would apply to the next foul, not that one. I wish it weren't so.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks