Just heard on Sports Center that the Big 12 Office will review the Niang no call

[DrT]

REVIEW = KI$$ MY BACKSIDE AND DEAL WITH IT...says TX 12 Frauds

[michaelrr1]

Without any specific evidence the Big12 will say that Niang wasn't set and it was the right call. So only not take away the "crap" call but also to "magnify" how good the call was. Then it will say the call on the ground was correct too. I'm sure the review will be to get the last word given all the crap attention the Big12 is getting. This happened to the Packers after the Seattle game. The "official review" was only to save face.

Then they should have called a blocking foul. Either way, the refs screwed up by making no call.

[HFCS]

Then they should have called a blocking foul. Either way, the refs screwed up by making no call.

There's no dancing around not fouling out an All Big 12 player either when he intentionally fouls. Regardless of what BS they throw out around the fixed end of the game.

[CysRage]

[cyclones500]

This probably means nothing but at least they know they are taking some heat on it

I'd rather have Big 12 office review how Iowa State could hold the lead for 7:30 of the final 7:35 and not win the game. Can we file a grievance about that?

[jammin]

The no call at the end was just plain bone-headed...the plays that need to be reveiwed are the Withey no call, the horrible, touchy, and timely fouls on melvin and babb.


Alright, Good Night Everybody!

ALL IN!!!!

[Balls]

It would be nice if JP and Fred send tape and request explanations for the last 4-5 calls as well as the lack of calls on KU's W on going over the backon multiple occasions. I would add specific analysis on the ref's viewing angles nd proximity to the plays to show they were consistently biased.

[Wesley]

Without any specific evidence the Big12 will say that Niang wasn't set and it was the right call. So only not take away the "crap" call but also to "magnify" how good the call was. Then it will say the call on the ground was correct too. I'm sure the review will be to get the last word given all the crap attention the Big12 is getting. This happened to the Packers after the Seattle game. The "official review" was only to save face.

Well then, they flat out lie.

[CysRage]

I was at the game and maybe it was the correct call but wasn't Withey supposed to foul out during regulation? I could have sworn that foul should have been on him

[kingcy]

I was at the game and maybe it was the correct call but wasn't Withey supposed to foul out during regulation? I could have sworn that foul should have been on him

It was.

[CysRage]

It was.

Why aren't people talking about this too? How does a ref report the wrong number who just happens to have 4 fouls and is one of KU's best players?

[CYcoFan]

I was at the game and maybe it was the correct call but wasn't Withey supposed to foul out during regulation? I could have sworn that foul should have been on him

Yes he was the one that reached in and they gave the foul to Young

[digZ]

I'd rather have Big 12 office review how Iowa State could hold the lead for 7:30 of the final 7:35 and not win the game. Can we file a grievance about that?

Might have something to do with giving Kansas free possessions and buckets. Niang set up that charge perfectly, Lucious was hitting his free throws. Guess his game plan just didn't account for getting violated by the refs in the final minutes.

I don't know why people are dogging on our defense so much, Niang took a charge like a boss, got rewarded by letting Kansas take two shots. Babb scrapped hard for a loose ball, got rewarded by giving Kansas two shots. Johnson was face guarded and was making 3's 5 feet out from the line.

[ManBearClone]

Yes he was the one that reached in and they gave the foul to Young

I can see how they could miss this call. I mean Young was almost within 4 ft and Whithy isn't exactly easy to pick out in a crowd.





click for bigger pictures.

[Wesley]

"Well, EJ. we did it. Ref Tom was on our side."