We have about five games to straighten out this mess. We are still looking for more thasn one person a game to score in double figures.
You either win or you do not. After five mediocre seasons, it is time to win.
We did good with LE cause he had awesome players. I'm sorry but Brackins and Lucca aren't exactly Fizer and Tinsley.
I've said this many times before, and all the LE detractors will never admit this, but LE would have taken WM's first team on a deep run in the NCAA tourney. That team wouldn't have been in the NIT under Larry.
LE had set the table again with WB, CS, JH and JV. If you could take the blinders off you might be able to see that.
The last two actually played under him. What did he do with that?
That's going to the problem with your argument. Probably why we disagree.
All the time, coaches put together a quick run at one time that they've never substantiated with that kind of record anytime else. People remember that time as though it would have happened all the time, no matter what else happened.
I maintain that it happens with Elite Eight runs all the time. There are a number of one-time wonders there that did catch lightning in a bottle. They never do it again, because things went there way unusually to get there the first time.
Wesley- Not to be picky, but we've had two bad season (and working on a 3rd). 4 years ago was mediocre (but a winning season) and 5 years ago we were in the NCAA and won a game before being knocked out by national champion North Carolina. Morgan was popular with his players and when you fire a coach like that you risk losing a lot of them, which we did, and we're still paying the price. I'm not sure GMac is the guy to get us out of this hole, but I haven't completely given up on him yet. My main problem with him is that his style is boring to watch, especially when we're losing.
I dont think LE would put up with the lack of hustle, and effort this team exhibits.