-
Re: Official Non-Crybaby Game Thread
i really hope marquis gets 1 more year.
-
Re: Official Non-Crybaby Game Thread
Buh bye..
Damn he was already booted.
-
Re: Official Non-Crybaby Game Thread
 Originally Posted by ajk4st8 Buh bye..
Damn he was already booted. Yes, announcing who you are, and the fact that you were recently booted, does not enhance your chances of staying.
-
Re: Official Non-Crybaby Game Thread
 Originally Posted by tamjam No reason to be negative after this one. Our offense is really coming together and it looks like the team flipped a switched and turned on their hustle and rebounding. Sure Lucca didn't score much, but he was great on defense and did all the little things on offense that he could do. I actually feel like tonite's game was more of a win, than a loss. You sir have smoked way too much meth. Great on defense... offense coming together. Unbelievable.
-
Re: Official Non-Crybaby Game Thread
 Originally Posted by State4good anybody else impressed with the knowledge of bilas and patrick about isu, they usually don't care about who duke plays, and not being negative but how come we struggle so much rebounding, anybody got any solutions? couldn't stand patrick. The way he was going on about Scheyer I thought maybe Tebow was Duke's PG.
-
Re: Official Non-Crybaby Game Thread
We lost by 21 to the #5 team.....eh, not gonna complain. Didn't play well sometimes (and first half had some phantom fouls called on us which didn't matter) or most of the 2nd half..but whatever
Anyway, doesn't really matter. I said on an earlier post us losing by 20 was one of three outcomes to the game. Definitely not surprised by the outcome.
If we knew how to rebound better though I guarantee the game would have turned out a lot better
Last edited by marothisu; 01-06-2010 at 11:22 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks