Lucca screwed us bad!

**JCREEK** · 02-10-2010, 08:27 PM

Oh my god we so beat Mizz if Lucca did not stick it in our back. I don't think they made a three all night who leaves like that. Shot at sunrise would be my vote. ISU was good enough to beat Mizz with 7 players wow great game. Good road effort who would has guesed 30 seconds a chance to win.

**BCforISU** · 02-10-2010, 08:29 PM

Originally Posted by JCREEK

Oh my god we so beat Mizz if Lucca did not stick it in our back. I don't think they made a three all night who leaves like that. Shot at sunrise would be my vote. ISU was good enough to beat Mizz with 7 players wow great game. Good road effort who would has guesed 30 seconds a chance to win.

Give it up, we wouldn't have been that close with Lucca.

**kkise** · 02-10-2010, 08:32 PM

Originally Posted by BCforISU

Give it up, we wouldn't have been that close with Lucca.

I disagree. We make some threes and it's our game.

**Erik4Cy** · 02-10-2010, 08:32 PM

I hate rehashing but yeah, this team has NO legitimate 3 point threat anymore. I don't say we need Lucca, we showed him tons of love and support and he quit on us. We just need someone who can hit the open 3 now. If we have one, we win this game tonight. Tough to win with 7 scholarship players and they made it a battle.

**ajk4st8** · 02-10-2010, 08:34 PM

Baylor pretty much dominates with only 7 players.

Just imagine the turnovers and easy layups had Lucca been playing. Just be glad we didnt have to see that.

**Knownothing** · 02-10-2010, 08:34 PM

christopherson has elected himself the crunch time scorer even though he can't make crap right now. He missed 3 in a row vs. Kansas state and missed 2 important times down the court tonight. We could have beat these guys with Lucca. I have no doubt.

**Tre4ISU** · 02-10-2010, 08:34 PM

Originally Posted by Erik4Cy

I hate rehashing but yeah, this team has NO legitimate 3 point threat anymore. I don't say we need Lucca, we showed him tons of love and support and he quit on us. We just need someone who can hit the open 3 now. If we have one, we win this game tonight. Tough to win with 7 scholarship players and they made it a battle.

I said this wehn he left. It won't be a big deal for some games, but there will be a few games where we will think that with Lucca we win. We have had a few now. With Scotty not healthy we have no shooters. None. Show me a successful team that doesn't have one guy that can shoot it.

**BCforISU** · 02-10-2010, 08:34 PM

Originally Posted by kkise

I disagree. We make some threes and it's our game.

So Lucca wouldn't have given up any more points??

**rhillary** · 02-10-2010, 08:35 PM

With Lucca, JVB and yes, even Boozer, we no longer have a legit 3 point threat. Just think, at the beginning of the year we had probably 3 or 4 guys that could take and hit a 3 when needed, now we have 1 at most (Gilstrap)?

**ajk4st8** · 02-10-2010, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by rhillary

With Lucca, JVB and yes, even Boozer, we no longer have a legit 3 point threat. Just think, at the beginning of the year we had probably 3 or 4 guys that could take and hit a 3 when needed, now we have 1 at most (Gilstrap)?

Just think.. at the beginning of the year we were playing teams that now have records of 5-17

**SpokaneCY** · 02-10-2010, 08:37 PM

Originally Posted by BCforISU

So Lucca wouldn't have given up any more points??

And I still want someone to point to a game-changing, crucial play by Lucca where he hit a big 3 when it mattered or got a rebound when it mattered.

**isufan** · 02-10-2010, 08:38 PM

Brackins used to be able to make a few of them.

**Wesley** · 02-10-2010, 08:38 PM

Originally Posted by Knownothing

christopherson has elected himself the crunch time scorer even though he can't make crap right now. He missed 3 in a row vs. Kansas state and missed 2 important times down the court tonight. We could have beat these guys with Lucca. I have no doubt.

Buckley needs to play instead of SC. He has mono and cannot practice shooting. If he cannot shoot, we need Buckley.