-
Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
Just read this...Former ISU basketball star unapologetic for remarks that cost him ESPN job | Ames News Online
I think his comments were definitely not timed well, but I still agree with him 100%.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by chuckd4735 The question begs, then, if you believe (and he believes) he said the right thing, why does it matter when he says it?
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by Cyrocks The question begs, then, if you believe (and he believes) he said the right thing, why does it matter when he says it? General public perception.
Obviously his blog is going to receive ALOT of negative feedback when posted a week after the disaster. If he would have posted last week, it would not have received near the attention, and I'm willing to bet he still has a job with ESPN.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by chuckd4735 General public perception.
Obviously his blog is going to receive ALOT of negative feedback when posted a week after the disaster. If he would have posted last week, it would not have received near the attention, and I'm willing to bet he still has a job with ESPN. I don't disagree with you. Just wanting to debate someone for some reason. -
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by chuckd4735 General public perception.
Obviously his blog is going to receive ALOT of negative feedback when posted a week after the disaster. If he would have posted last week, it would not have received near the attention, and I'm willing to bet he still has a job with ESPN. If you wait until no one will be offended, there's not much point in even writing anything.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by Ms3r4ISU If you wait until no one will be offended, there's not much point in even writing anything. I don't disagree, but my point remains the same. The article means the same thing no matter when you blog it. However, how it is perceived by the general public most definitely changes with time.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
Nothing wrong with what he said, its just Haiti didn't need someone to tell them why they are the way they are. They just need help.
Remember that stressed spelled backwards is desserts!
"The New England Patriots: As annoying as the Yankess, just with 23 fewer titles." -
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
Well, I just got done reading the whole column for the first time, and while I agreed with it in part and disagreed with it in part, I didn't find it particularly offensive except for this; Dear Haitians – First of all, kudos on developing the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. Your commitment to human rights, infrastructure, and birth control should be applauded. As we prepare to assist you in this difficult time, a polite request: If it’s possible, could you not re-build your island home in the image of its predecessor? Could you not resort to the creation of flimsy shanty- and shack-towns? And could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while? Sincerely, The Rest of the World
If Paul had written everything else besides that section word for word, I don't think the reaction would have been nearly as negative as it was. I think that section was a bit unnecessary and needlessly provocative.
As for Paul, well, I'm sure that some diehard Cyclone fans that post here who feel we are supposed to love our former student-athletes unconditionally will slam me, but the guy just strikes me as being a first-class *********. He is certainly highly intelligent, but he strikes me as being exceptionally arrogant and just not a very pleasant person all-around. I really can't feel much more for him than pure neutrality, if he gets back into basketball and can actually stay with a team, good for him I suppose. If he gets back into writing and has a best-seller, good for him. If he ends up in poverty like most of the population of Haiti, oh well.....
Last edited by ISUChippewa; 04-08-2010 at 01:55 PM.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by ISUChippewa Well, I just got done reading the whole column for the first time, and while I agreed with it in part and disagreed with it in part, I didn't find it particularly offensive except for this; Dear Haitians – First of all, kudos on developing the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. Your commitment to human rights, infrastructure, and birth control should be applauded. As we prepare to assist you in this difficult time, a polite request: If it’s possible, could you not re-build your island home in the image of its predecessor? Could you not resort to the creation of flimsy shanty- and shack-towns? And could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while? Sincerely, The Rest of the World
If Paul had written everything else besides that section word for word, I don't think the reaction would have been nearly as negative as it was. I think that section was a bit unnecessary and needlessly provocative.
As for Paul, well, I'm sure that some diehard Cyclone fans that post here who feel we are supposed to love our former student-athletes unconditionally will slam me, but the guy just strikes me as being a first-class *********. He is certainly highly intelligent, but he strikes me as being exceptionally arrogant and just not a very pleasant person all-around. I really can't feel much more for him than pure neutrality, if he gets back into basketball and can actually stay with him, good for him I suppose. If he gets back into writing and has a best-seller, good for him. If he ends up in poverty like most of the population of Haiti, oh well.....
I still like Paul. He writes what he feels. It's called freedom of speech and I am tired of our society censoring every thing so it is PC. Yeah he made some comments that a lot of people don't agree with. Yes he took a shot at Haiti in a time of disaster. News flash for you. Lots of countries out there take shots at the United States. When I studied in Australia, I saw anti US flyers and publications. I admire people who say what they mean and mean what they say.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
Well, Shirley has a poor sense of history if he thinks the Haitians are the reason Haiti sucks.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by chuckd4735 Why wasn't the crybaby blogging about Haiti weeks/months/years before the earthquake? Had he ever mentioned Haiti in any of his blogs leading up to that one?
You're right on the timing. He chose to write it to get people to read it. Sounds like a guy that thinks he's a lot smarter than he actually is.
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
Yes he took a shot at Haiti in a time of disaster. News flash for you. Lots of countries out there take shots at the United States. When I studied in Australia, I saw anti US flyers and publications. I admire people who say what they mean and mean what they say.
Apples and oranges here man. We got support from all over the world after 9/11. And besides, when we have an earthquake that kills 250,000 people (God forbid), let's talk then and see what kind of international support we may or may not get.
So you saw some anti-US flyers abroad? Okay? And your point is?
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by ISUChippewa Yes he took a shot at Haiti in a time of disaster. News flash for you. Lots of countries out there take shots at the United States. When I studied in Australia, I saw anti US flyers and publications. I admire people who say what they mean and mean what they say.
Apples and oranges here man. We got support from all over the world after 9/11. And besides, when we have an earthquake that kills 250,000 people (God forbid), let's talk then and see what kind of international support we may or may not get.
So you saw some anti-US flyers abroad? Okay? And your point is?
My point is everyone has their own opinions about other people, and nations. Whose job is it to say whose opinion is right?
-
Re: Paul Shirley & the journalism forum
 Originally Posted by ribsnwhiskey Why wasn't the crybaby blogging about Haiti weeks/months/years before the earthquake? Had he ever mentioned Haiti in any of his blogs leading up to that one?
You're right on the timing. He chose to write it to get people to read it. Sounds like a guy that thinks he's a lot smarter than he actually is. It was plain old exploiting a situation to gain popularity. The shock and awe. He ranks right up there with the likes of Howard Stern as far as "journalists" go. The guy has always been an ***.
 Originally Posted by MNCyGuy The only answer to "who/what is GeronimusClone?" is in fact "GeronimousClone". You're like The Todd on Scrubs.  Originally Posted by Angie This is why you're my favorite  Originally Posted by MoreCowbell GC, he's obviously all man. And I don't think Ellen would go *****, even for GC...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks