We lost the following categories because of people being stupid:
Most likely to be banned in 2011 -
Most Successful ***** Stirrer -
Or those topics were stupid choices to choose anyways.... They could be seen as personal attacks when a poster is sensitive to when their name got put into nomination.
You just need a straight up Poster of the Year and Poster "who leaves a lot to be desired" Awards.
Off-Topic Poster of the year
Most likely to derail a thread
Most likely to say "keep this on topic"
Most likely to post in a thread just to say the thread is stupid
Originally Posted by MNCyGuy
The only answer to "who/what is GeronimusClone?" is in fact "GeronimousClone". You're like The Todd on Scrubs.
Originally Posted by Angie
This is why you're my favorite
Originally Posted by MoreCowbell
GC, he's obviously all man. And I don't think Ellen would go *****, even for GC...
Or those topics were stupid choices to choose anyways.... They could be seen as personal attacks when a poster is sensitive to when their name got put into nomination. I.e. Uniguy4cy.....
You honestly think a personal attack online offends me?
Still, it is a fantastic idea- this community is something real, and, even though it mostly diverts my attention from my family and responsibilities, should have some sort of recognition awards.
I even think a clever avatar/sig award isnt out of question- it seems that the 'clonies name comes from the dunder-mifflin awards in The Office and you can have MANY awards.
Sports journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read.
We could also use an award for the biggest Iowa hater as well.
"Hater of the Year".... I like it.
I nominate Cyclonestate78 as "Hater of the Year".
Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice? Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.
Or those topics were stupid choices to choose anyways.... They could be seen as personal attacks when a poster is sensitive to when their name got put into nomination.
The "most likely to be banned" vote is off the table, so you can quit gunning for it.
Bookmarks