-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by Clones85' YOU GUYS ARE READING WAY TO MUCH INTO THIS!! It's a comedy show, not Lost. First: Office plot twists and subplots
Second: United States financial crisis
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by Clones85' YOU GUYS ARE READING WAY TO MUCH INTO THIS!! It's a comedy show, not Lost. Lost sucks.
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by jumbopackage There's no way he's gone for good.
Though I think he should be. His character is played out, IMO.
The entire show pretty much jumped the shark a year or so ago. There have been signs of jumping. If Ted McGinley had been cast as Michael's new boss, I would be seriously worried.
Yeah well, ya know, that's just, like uh, your opinion, man. -
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by cyclonekj There have been signs of jumping. If Ted McGinley had been cast as Michael's new boss, I would be seriously worried. Does he ever show up on a show before it's too late?
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by cyclonekj There have been signs of jumping. If Ted McGinley had been cast as Michael's new boss, I would be seriously worried. Jim and Pam getting together...the whole Dwight/Andy/Angela drama, any relationship Michael gets in...
ugh
it's just crap.
There's no tension, no edge anymore, not to mention the entire show has gotten just absurd.
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
They kind of went back on the Assistant to Regional Manager being a made up position..
When they merged the branches, it was made clear that Jim was the #2...But tonight, it was back to not being an official position.
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by Dolokaju They kind of went back on the Assistant to Regional Manager being a made up position..
When they merged the branches, it was made clear that Jim was the #2...But tonight, it was back to not being an official position. I still think it is a real position, Jim just explained it horribly. Jan offered Jim the number 2 position before the merger. After the merger, Jim got a raise for being the number 2 guy.
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
No one is familiar with the british office?? It's not the first time they've taken plot turns directly from them, although I think David Brent's version of this was much better.. I like their version a lot better in many ways.. mainly because they were free to go anywhere wth the story, knowing they were going to end it.. the US version has to worry about not painting themselves into a corner in case they can get away with milking this thing for a decade or so..
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
Stringer Bell is the new VP? Bad ***.
It's Bushbama!
2 time Chupacabra of Humor Award Recipient  Originally Posted by joefrog I will admit, I am to blame in sometimes making mountains out of molehills. -
Re: The office SPOILER thread
I think Michael quit because he didn't really want the party. That was his "complaint" but he wanted more, and David Wallace only picked up that part and said he'd give him the party. He wanted more than that.
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
The office sucked ever since the relationship crap started and when Ryan went weird.
Why do shows always have to ruin such a perfect thing?
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
Steve Carrell has already signed on for 3 more years. Love or hate Michael, he is the focus of the show and it would suffer without him.
I loved the episode. I love how Michael was acting like a baby. I also loved how when the CFO gave him what he want, he quits. The show was due for a surprise.
Remember that stressed spelled backwards is desserts!
"The New England Patriots: As annoying as the Yankess, just with 23 fewer titles." -
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by cmoneyr Stringer Bell is the new VP? Bad ***. Well, until Omar and Avon show up, then it's lights out.  Originally Posted by ajk4st8 The office sucked ever since the relationship crap started and when Ryan went weird. I don't think it sucks but I don't worry about it if I miss an episode. I honestly forgot about it until I saw this thread pop up.
-
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by CyForPresident Lost sucks.
I just love it when people post comments like this without any explanation.
Just because your tiny little mind can't wrap itself around the complexity of LOST doesn't mean the show sucks. Maybe it is you that sucks. -
Re: The office SPOILER thread
 Originally Posted by CyForPresident Lost sucks.
Wow....... I don't even want to know how high your standards must be.
Remember that stressed spelled backwards is desserts!
"The New England Patriots: As annoying as the Yankess, just with 23 fewer titles."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks