Erin Andrews unplugged

**isuno1fan** · 07-20-2009, 02:46 PM

Originally Posted by AnkenyCy24

Well, it couldn't really be an adjacent room. Because there would not be a peephole in between the two. Cuz, then one room would be able to see into the other room. And about 90% of the time, the people in those rooms don't know each other...

It's a peephole installed between bathrooms. They make cameras these days that are the size of a pencil eraser on a #2 pencil. I suspect the hole is in a non-obvious place and the risk of getting caught is quite low.

**richey24** · 07-20-2009, 02:47 PM

Originally Posted by AnkenyCy24

Well, it couldn't really be an adjacent room. Because there would not be a peephole in between the two. Cuz, then one room would be able to see into the other room. And about 90% of the time, the people in those rooms don't know each other...

Not a peephole in a door, a peephole that someone drilled in the wall.

**San Francisco Cy** · 07-20-2009, 04:48 PM

Originally Posted by richey24

Not a peephole in a door, a peephole that someone drilled in the wall.

Ah, gotcha. Yeah, that would be a pretty elaborate plot, I guess, to know exactly what room she would be in...unless they just got lucky...

**richey24** · 07-20-2009, 04:49 PM

Originally Posted by AnkenyCy24

Ah, gotcha. Yeah, that would be a pretty elaborate plot, I guess, to know exactly what room she would be in...unless they just got lucky...

Yeah, I'd say it has to be some type of an inside job, either the guy worked there or he knew someone that worked there that fed him the intel.

**sodakjoe** · 07-20-2009, 04:53 PM

Originally Posted by richey24

Not a peephole in a door, a peephole that someone drilled in the wall.

If you see the video, the positioning looks like a pretty standard hotel room, filmed from the door. The video is creepy.

**richey24** · 07-20-2009, 04:56 PM

It's definitely not through a standard peephole, only way it's through the door is if the peephole was totally removed, which would be extremely obvious.

**tim_redd** · 07-20-2009, 04:58 PM

I'd say it was Cosmo Kramer.

**mplscyclone** · 07-20-2009, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by AnkenyCy24

Ah, gotcha. Yeah, that would be a pretty elaborate plot, I guess, to know exactly what room she would be in...unless they just got lucky...

From what I heard, this guy has videos of a bunch of regular ladies in this hotel. I think he hit the jackpot with it being Andrews, but from the sounds of it, it seems like he's been doing this to random ladies for a while...

**sodakjoe** · 07-20-2009, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by richey24

It's definitely not through a standard peephole, only way it's through the door is if the peephole was totally removed, which would be extremely obvious.

Wasn't the story that the peephole was reversed? And honestly, how often do you look at the peephole when entering a hotel room?

**richey24** · 07-20-2009, 05:18 PM

Originally Posted by sodakjoe

Wasn't the story that the peephole was reversed? And honestly, how often do you look at the peephole when entering a hotel room?

Everytime? It's right at eye level. Have you ever looked through a peephole? If this was through a normal peephole it would have the fish eye look, the videos don't have any distortion and you can easily see that their isn't any glass or anything inbetween her and the camera.

**Cyclone62** · 07-20-2009, 06:23 PM

Travman, I honestly can't believe that I just read that.

Yes, she's pretty, that does not mean that she has to take her clothes off for anyone just to "satisfy curiosity" of perverts that want to see everything naked. Seriously, look at Lucy Pinder. I don't think she's been bypassed on the "curiosity" scale since she's been shot topless.

I don't want to say that it's akin to rape, because it isn't, but forcing (subliminally) or otherwise, to take off their clothes for the enjoyment of others is freaking disgusting to say the least.

**Jack & Hilton** · 07-20-2009, 07:35 PM

This sicko nerd needs to spend life in jail,and he'd probably like it. If he's had that camera in all the time he's probably seen minors. This sounds like something from a crime show

**Rogue52** · 07-20-2009, 09:31 PM

Why is she doing her hair while nude? All the girls I know get dressed first. Who says this wasn't by design....?

**TheCaptain** · 07-20-2009, 09:32 PM

Who says this wasn't by design....?

For what purpose?

**sodakjoe** · 07-20-2009, 09:39 PM

Originally Posted by richey24

Everytime? It's right at eye level. Have you ever looked through a peephole? If this was through a normal peephole it would have the fish eye look, the videos don't have any distortion and you can easily see that their isn't any glass or anything inbetween her and the camera.

I don't think people in general pay attention to whether there is/isn't a peephole in the door. Usually as you approach your room, you're looking at the key slot, not the peephole.

When I lived in Eaton a few years back, the peepholes were removable from the outside. You just had to walk up and unscrew it. It wasn't until someone complained about pranks being played as a result of that action, such as shooting water pistols through them, that anyone in authority positions even noticed (They have since been glued in). It is entirely possible that an employee at the hotel had set up this particular room so he/she could film whatever is going on inside. I know another poster mentioned there was a rumor that this guy had multiple videos and just happened to get one of Andrews.