7/23 NY Post Article on Erin Andrews

ESPN bans NY Post reporters over Andrews video - Yahoo! News

OK, so nothing new here but I wanted to post because of this blurb in the article:

"Every state but Iowa now has some law on the books dealing with video voyeurism, according to the National Center for Victims of Crime."

So, Iowa, film away!!

Alright! Iowa leading the way again!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu1RP34FLXU]YouTube - Rockwell - Somebody's Watching Me: Relaid Audio[/ame]

"Every state but Iowa now has some law on the books dealing with video voyeurism, according to the National Center for Victims of Crime."

Which brings up the topic of debate: If anybody watched that video, is that individual not also an accomplice, and guilty of participating?

That individual willfully opened a URL with the intent of watching an illegal activity. This did not happen before their eyes.

I'm just asking, because believe me, when I first heard about it, I did search for links to see the video, but by then everything was taken down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Go2Guy

"Every state but Iowa now has some law on the books dealing with video voyeurism, according to the National Center for Victims of Crime."

Which brings up the topic of debate: If anybody watched that video, is that individual not also an accomplice, and guilty of participating?

That individual willfully opened a URL with the intent of watching an illegal activity. This did not happen before their eyes.

I'm just asking, because believe me, when I first heard about it, I did search for links to see the video, but by then everything was taken down.

---

That's what I was wondering. How can it possibly be right or legal for all theses news places to show a pic from the video?