jbhtexas is on the right track here. After doing some reading, it seems the three member panel that came out with this ruling did not hear or consider what evidence the NFL has on the players or the validity of that evidence. The issue they were considering was whether or not Goodell even had the power to punish these players at all. Their determination was that maybe he does but, he didn't follow correct procedure in this case. It doesn't mean the players get off. It just means their suspensions are lifted until Goodell can provide a path to punishment that he does have the power to enforce. The example I read was that he could go back and give them the exact same punishments, but do it under the "Conduct detrimental to the NFL" umbrella, an avenue where he has more power, and the panel may uphold it.
"What a horrible night to have a curse."
"Please bury me with all my stuff, because you know it's mine..."
"Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood."
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com - All rights reserved 2005-09. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of CycloneFanatic.com or Iowa State University. The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the University protected by the trademark and copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries and are used on this web site under license from the University. Original site design, premise & construction by Jeremy Lind.