36Likes -
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by Hawkeye11en1 Duh, gary. I dont think he is man enough to pull off Ace.
I LIEK CHOCOLATE MILK - The Partisan Bat  Originally Posted by ChrisMWilliams Hmmm...I'm not a huge "weiner"  Originally Posted by Angie "Yeah, Chris' weiner is a way bigger get than mine."  -
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by Hawkeye11en1 fer cerius? I've been drinking but I know what I saw.
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
Solid thread. Cycofan you're still wrong.
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by Jordanj6502 No. just no... ball carrier being contacted has nothing to do with anything in this situation.
Um it absolutely does. A defender can be called for a helmet to helmet shot on a ball carrier, if the offending tackler is the primary contact. If the blow to the head happens after primary contact and it isn't a defenseless or down ball carrier/ rec then it isn't a penalty
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by cycloneG I'be been drinking but I know what I saw. I don't know you, but I like you. A lot.
Team Rainbo_™  Originally Posted by VikesFan4Ever28 You have almost 5 crap tons. -
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by cycarob Solid thread. Cycofan you're still wrong.
About what
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by CYcoFan Um it absolutely does. A defender can be called for a helmet to helmet shot on a ball carrier, if the offending tackler is the primary contact. If the blow to the head happens after primary contact and it isn't a defenseless or down ball carrier/ rec then it isn't a penalty Give me the rule, preferably in the rule book, where this is stated.
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by CYcoFan About what Whatever you're arguing about. It's more of a general statement about how you don't know anything. You should get to know Knownothing.
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by Jordanj6502 Give me the rule, preferably in the rule book, where this is stated.
I will find the rule, but are you saying that a tackler can't be called for helmet to helmet on a ball carrier? If so this is the exact type of ignorance that leads to inappropriate outcry following Monday's ruling
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
5 star thread. especially the parts with me in it. would read again.
I LIEK CHOCOLATE MILK - The Partisan Bat  Originally Posted by ChrisMWilliams Hmmm...I'm not a huge "weiner"  Originally Posted by Angie "Yeah, Chris' weiner is a way bigger get than mine."  -
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
I'm too lazy to start a thread about the #8 team in the nation losing so I'm going to hijack this gem of a thread. Pac12 sucks!
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by Cycl1 5 star thread. especially the parts with me in it. would read again.
Your avatar and Sig did add something...
Edit - It always does tho cause it is awesome
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
 Originally Posted by CYcoFan Um it absolutely does. A defender can be called for a helmet to helmet shot on a ball carrier, if the offending tackler is the primary contact. If the blow to the head happens after primary contact and it isn't a defenseless or down ball carrier/ rec then it isn't a penalty What are you even arguing? That a second defender can't be called for a helmet to helmet tackle on a ball carrier?
-
Re: Hawkeye11en1 with your interpretation of rules, what did you think of this play?
How many points do you get for having your username in a thread title?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks