43Likes -
Re: nhl lockout over
 Originally Posted by leroycyclone In the 80's, locals used to talk about the Blackhawks fans. They said that the team had 40,000 loyal fans. 20,000 fans that went to very game and 20,000 fans that watched every game on closed circuit TV. So 40,000 fans are rejoicing today and the rest of Chicagoland doesn't know that the strike is over. and by "locals" i'm assuming you mean people from iowa who have no concept of hockey?
you're an idiot. hockey is huge in chicago. not as big as football by any means but hawks tickets are easily the second hardest to come by only after the bears.
-
Re: nhl lockout over
don't get all the hockey hate in this thread. would guess it has to do with hockey being non existent in the state of Iowa (virtually no youth hockey, no real college hockey, no pro team) and people not growing up with it.
I will tell you that hockey is similar to NASCAR in that it is pretty bad to watch on tv but is a great event/sport to see live.
-
Re: nhl lockout over
 Originally Posted by stevefrench and by "locals" i'm assuming you mean people from iowa who have no concept of hockey?
you're an idiot. hockey is huge in chicago. not as big as football by any means but hawks tickets are easily the second hardest to come by only after the bears. Locals referred to the Chicagoland residents.
You crossed the line. You must not have lived in Chicago in the 80's or you would have known of the old adage. You must not have been a season ticket holder. You must not understand that CF is about sports, not about cheap shots. In hockey, they take cheap shots. I don't appreciate yours. Please refrain or find another site.
-
Re: nhl lockout over
 Originally Posted by stevefrench and by "locals" i'm assuming you mean people from iowa who have no concept of hockey?
you're an idiot. hockey is huge in chicago. not as big as football by any means but hawks tickets are easily the second hardest to come by only after the bears. This is correct. The average attendance at a Blackhawks game last year was 21,533, when capacity is just over 20,000.
But in Leroy's defense, how many professional sports have capacity of less than 20,000? Of course theirs going to be a high demand for these tickets.
To put it all into perspective:
The Blackhawks attendance record in a season/game was 22,247 in 2008, finishing with a .657 winning percentage and 2nd in their division.
The last time the Cubs were that low: 1983. Finished with a winning percentage of .438, 5th in their division.
The last time the White Sox were that low: 2002. Finished with a winning percentage of .500, 2nd in division. Haven't had a lower attendance since switching stadiums.
I'm not gonna get into the Bears.
Bottom line, because tickets are hard to come by doesn't mean more people like the game.
-
Re: nhl lockout over

LET'S GO BLACKHAWKS!!!
Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice? Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.  -
Re: nhl lockout over
Who cares about regular season hockey. I will admit I did watch quite a bit of playoff hockey last year. That **** was exciting and the announcer made every play sound like it was incredible. I encourage you to watch a playoff game for yourself to see.
-
Re: nhl lockout over
Well it looks like I am in the minority here but I am pumped!
-
Re: nhl lockout over
I'm actually pumped for the shortened season. If it's anything like the 94-95 season, It'll be a fun one. Basically 3 months of playoff hockey.
-
Re: nhl lockout over
 Originally Posted by Swanson10 You prefer an 22 hours of NFL and 2 hours of poker? Yes?
They say that English surnames came from what you did with your life. I'm so glad my last name isn't Dickinson. -
Re: nhl lockout over
This is why I watch hockey: -
Re: nhl lockout over
Oh and if you're wondering, yes, that's me and Fitzy in the green.
Oh and thats Ellen with the hockey stick.
-
Re: nhl lockout over
One of the best parts about hockey, there are virtually no bandwagon fans. People either love it and follow it pretty closely, or they don't. Hockey's biggest problem is that it isn't a great TV sport, but it is probably my favorite sport to attend in person. I don't follow the NHL as closely as some other sports because I don't really have a favorite team. After the North Stars moved I really haven't had much passion for any NHL team besides hating Dallas.
When all is said and done, more is said than done -
Re: nhl lockout over
 Originally Posted by HGPuck One of the best parts about hockey, there are virtually no bandwagon fans. People either love it and follow it pretty closely, or they don't. Hockey's biggest problem is that it isn't a great TV sport, but it is probably my favorite sport to attend in person. I don't follow the NHL as closely as some other sports because I don't really have a favorite team. After the North Stars moved I really haven't had much passion for any NHL team besides hating Dallas. I actually don't mind watching it on TV. The lack of commercials (at least compared to other shows and sports) is great.
 Originally Posted by im4cyclones [Anything] is easy if you are content to suck at it. -
Re: nhl lockout over
To answer you question, the NBA has a capacity of under 20,000 in almost every arena. It is a matter of being able to view a sport from different distances and the size of the playing surface. Baseball and even more so football can work with larger venues while basketball and hockey need smaller venues for pretty obvious reasons.  Originally Posted by ISUCubswin This is correct. The average attendance at a Blackhawks game last year was 21,533, when capacity is just over 20,000.
But in Leroy's defense, how many professional sports have capacity of less than 20,000? Of course theirs going to be a high demand for these tickets.
To put it all into perspective:
The Blackhawks attendance record in a season/game was 22,247 in 2008, finishing with a .657 winning percentage and 2nd in their division.
The last time the Cubs were that low: 1983. Finished with a winning percentage of .438, 5th in their division.
The last time the White Sox were that low: 2002. Finished with a winning percentage of .500, 2nd in division. Haven't had a lower attendance since switching stadiums.
I'm not gonna get into the Bears.
Bottom line, because tickets are hard to come by doesn't mean more people like the game. When all is said and done, more is said than done -
Re: nhl lockout over
 Originally Posted by HGPuck One of the best parts about hockey, there are virtually no bandwagon fans. People either love it and follow it pretty closely, or they don't. Hockey's biggest problem is that it isn't a great TV sport, but it is probably my favorite sport to attend in person. I don't follow the NHL as closely as some other sports because I don't really have a favorite team. After the North Stars moved I really haven't had much passion for any NHL team besides hating Dallas. I don't know if I'd say there aren't any bandwagon fans. I've noticed an uptick in casual hockey fans the past few years especially due to the excitement of the playoffs. But the strike probably didn't help retaining those casual fans.
H.U.C.A.C-- We're here to ____ ____ up!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks