CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic > General - Non ISU > Pro Sports
Forgot Password? | Sign Up!
Register Members Mark Forums Read

Notices

Please help support CF, Donate Today!

» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
Advertise Here


Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2008, 12:06 PM   #46
Rookie
 
trevn's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by CloneFan65 View Post
Dodgers? My D-Backs won the division last year and should be healthy, the rookies have a year under their belts, and with Dan Haren added to the rotation the D-Backs have the best pair of pitchers at the top of their rotation in the National League.
The Dodgers have the best/deepest rotation and bullpen. Arizona has the best 1-2 punch at the top of their rotation, but the Dodgers are deeper. The questions for the D-Backs will be, can they consistantly score runs and who is going to close games for you since Valverde is gone? Lyon? He's a good setup guy but I don't know that he's a closer. Also, you better hope the rookies don't have a sophmore slump, which some will. Meanwhile, the Dodgers upgraded CF with the addition of Andruw Jones, added pitching depth with Hiroki Kuroda, and upgraded managers from Grady Little to Joe Torre. And this is the team that led the division the entire year up until the beginning of August.

That all said, the D-Backs, Rockies, and Dodgers will all be very evenly matched, but I see the Dodgers pitching depth being the reason they win the division. Either way, it should be a fun year to watch the NL West (the most competitive division in baseball IMO).

Simulated Sports - A really fun college basketball simulation for fantasy sports fanatics. PM me if you want more info.

Last edited by trevn; 01-31-2008 at 12:13 PM.
trevn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:09 PM   #47
Hall-Of-Famer
 
Send a message via AIM to mwitt Send a message via MSN to mwitt Send a message via Yahoo to mwitt
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by isuarch80 View Post
He only is guaranteed to leadoff ONE time per game :)
Which scenario would provide more RBI opportunities for Soriano? Brian Roberts hitting in front of him or Ted Lilly?

I love Lou Piniella, but I really disagree with the idea of leading off Soriano if you have a valid alternative.
mwitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:10 PM   #48
Starter
 
clonerules's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
Assumed Mets starting lineup and rotation:
1B - Carlos Delgado
2B - Luis Castillo
SS - Jose Reyes
3B - David Wright
LF - Moises Alou
CF - Carlos Beltran
RF - Ryan Church
C - Brian Schneider
Rotation - Johan Santana, Pedro Martinez, Orlando Hernandez, Oliver Perez, John Maine
Closer - Billy Wagner

Phillies:
1B - Ryan Howard
2B - Chase Utley
SS - Jimmy Rollins
3B - Pedro Feliz
LF - Pat Burrell
CF - Shane Victorino
RF - Geoff Jenkins
Rotation - Cole Hamels, Brett Myers, Kyle Kendrick, Jamie Moyer, Adam Eaton
Closer - Brad Lidge

I guess I fail to see how the Mets don't win the East big...
how bout this braves lineup?

Atlanta Braves

1b~ Mark Texiera .317 avg 32 hr
2b~ Kelly Johnson .276 avg .375 obp
ss~ yunel escobar .326 avg .385 obp
3b~ chipper jones .337 avg 29 hr
lf~ matt diaz .338 avg 12 hr platoon
cf~ mark kotsay .282 avg .337 obp career avgs
rf~ jeff francouer .293 avg 19 hr
c~briann mccann .270 avg 18 hr

rotation~ j.smoltz, t.hudson, t.glavine,m.hampton,c.james
closer~ r.soriano

with texiera in the middle of the lineup, teams wont be able to pitch around chipper this year to go after andruw. add in the fact that both mark and chipper are switch hitters, and you have a very solid lineup from top to bottom. with bobby cox at the helm once again, there is no reason this team cant win the division adn contend for a world series title!!
clonerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:18 PM   #49
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by clonerules View Post
how bout this braves lineup?

Atlanta Braves

1b~ Mark Texiera .317 avg 32 hr
2b~ Kelly Johnson .276 avg .375 obp
ss~ yunel escobar .326 avg .385 obp
3b~ chipper jones .337 avg 29 hr
lf~ matt diaz .338 avg 12 hr platoon
cf~ mark kotsay .282 avg .337 obp career avgs
rf~ jeff francouer .293 avg 19 hr
c~briann mccann .270 avg 18 hr

rotation~ j.smoltz, t.hudson, t.glavine,m.hampton,c.james
closer~ r.soriano

with texiera in the middle of the lineup, teams wont be able to pitch around chipper this year to go after andruw. add in the fact that both mark and chipper are switch hitters, and you have a very solid lineup from top to bottom. with bobby cox at the helm once again, there is no reason this team cant win the division adn contend for a world series title!!
To me your lineup looks like the core is an older version of what they had in the late '90s and early '00s (and although they won all those division titles, how many championships did it net them?) with very little experience around it. The addition of Texiera did very little to help the Braves late last season, Smoltz and Glavine are past their prime. While there might be some optimism in Atlanta about this team, I just don't see it this year.

Attempt #3
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:19 PM   #50
All-Star
 
isuarch80's Avatar
 
Send a message via MSN to isuarch80
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by mwitt View Post
Which scenario would provide more RBI opportunities for Soriano? Brian Roberts hitting in front of him or Ted Lilly?

I love Lou Piniella, but I really disagree with the idea of leading off Soriano if you have a valid alternative.
I knew what you meant - that's why I smiled; being very sarcastic. However, I have no problem with him at that spot. Just my opinion...

"People tend to overestimate what they can achieve in a year, but underestimate what they can achieve in a lifetime. Start with the molehill, then build the mountain. Start where you are with what you are and never lose sight of your dream." -Anthony Robbins
isuarch80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:21 PM   #51
Addict
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by cloneu View Post
Red Sox will win again. Everyone else will have to wait till 2009 for their chance.
I think the Tigers might have something to say about that... Any lineup with a Hall of Famer batting 9th is pretty scary...

cybsball20 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:22 PM   #52
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
There is quite the possibility that Nathan is going to get moved, but it'll be towards the trade deadline if:
1. the Twins are out of it (and that's likely)
2. they can't resign him for a reasonable price
3. the can get good value out of trading him.

Being that Nathan's one of the top 5 closers in the game, he's not going to come cheap, so if the Twins are looking to retool for 2010, the year they open their new stadium, yeah, it looks like Nathan could get moved.
To clarify, I think only two of any of those three scenarios I listed have to come true in order for the Twins to move Nathan. If the Twins are out of it and they can get a lot in return for him (regardless of whether they can resign him or not), they'll trade him. If they're out of it and can't resign him for a reasonable amount, they'll try to get what they can for him on the market. Conversely, if the Twins are in the mix for a postseason birth, and they know they can't resign him in the offseason but they can trade him for a package of players that will fill immediate holes in the lineup, you will see him moved in that scenario as well.

Attempt #3
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:25 PM   #53
Starter
 
clonerules's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
To me your lineup looks like the core is an older version of what they had in the late '90s and early '00s (and although they won all those division titles, how many championships did it net them?) with very little experience around it. The addition of Texiera did very little to help the Braves late last season, Smoltz and Glavine are past their prime. While there might be some optimism in Atlanta about this team, I just don't see it this year.


seriously? the only players in that lineup over 30 are chipper and kotsay compare that with the mets..im counting 5, 30+ plus players with a couple of them pushin 40
clonerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:28 PM   #54
Hall-Of-Famer
 
Send a message via AIM to mwitt Send a message via MSN to mwitt Send a message via Yahoo to mwitt
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by clonerules View Post
seriously? the only players in that lineup over 30 are chipper and kotsay compare that with the mets..im counting 5, 30+ plus players with a couple of them pushin 40
I don't think the problem with the Braves is their lineup at all, nor do I think it is John Smoltz (who has to start declining sometime, though) or Tim Hudson. My problem with the Bravos lies with Mike Hampton and their middle relief. Rafael Soriano is pure filth, though.
mwitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:31 PM   #55
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by clonerules View Post
seriously? the only players in that lineup over 30 are chipper and kotsay compare that with the mets..im counting 5, 30+ plus players with a couple of them pushin 40
Umm... Have you looked at your pitching staff? Smoltz's, Glavine's Hampton's, and Hudson's rookie seasons weren't exactly 5 years ago. Chipper Jones ain't exactly a young one, either. Francoeur intrigues me - last year was the first year he actually put any kind of numbers up. Was that an anomaly, or has he finally learned how to be productive in the Major League batting box? One season of good (but not great) numbers won't exactly convince me.

I will admit, Texiera, Escobar, and McCann are all interesting pieces.

Attempt #3
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:33 PM   #56
Starter
 
clonerules's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by mwitt View Post
I don't think the problem with the Braves is their lineup at all, nor do I think it is John Smoltz (who has to start declining sometime, though) or Tim Hudson. My problem with the Bravos lies with Mike Hampton and their middle relief. Rafael Soriano is pure filth, though.
the braves will be sending 8 or 9 legitimate 4th or 5th starters to spring training, so if mike cant throw, they have the depth this year to overcome his loss. as far as the bullpen goes, peter moylan was in the top 5 last year as far as the numbers go for relief pitchers..add in the fact that mike gonzalez should come back and b ready to go in early june, and i feel that the bullpen is solid!! and if he or peter cant get the job done, we always have will ohman
clonerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:33 PM   #57
Addict
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by mwitt View Post
I don't think the problem with the Braves is their lineup at all, nor do I think it is John Smoltz (who has to start declining sometime, though) or Tim Hudson. My problem with the Bravos lies with Mike Hampton and their middle relief. Rafael Soriano is pure filth, though.
The only team that has worse middle relief then the Braves is the Mets who might have the worst in baseball...

cybsball20 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:34 PM   #58
Starter
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

i noticed that the yankees play the university of south florida and virginia tech before spring training... is that normal?
ISUboi12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:34 PM   #59
Starter
 
clonerules's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
Umm... Have you looked at your pitching staff? Smoltz's, Glavine's Hampton's, and Hudson's rookie seasons weren't exactly 5 years ago. Chipper Jones ain't exactly a young one, either. Francoeur intrigues me - last year was the first year he actually put any kind of numbers up. Was that an anomaly, or has he finally learned how to be productive in the Major League batting box? One season of good (but not great) numbers won't exactly convince me.

I will admit, Texiera, Escobar, and McCann are all interesting pieces.

but with that logic, dont you have to look at pedro, el duque (who prolly is really 45) and billy wagner who seems to b on the decline. dont you?
clonerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:36 PM   #60
Addict
Donor 
 
isucyfan's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

[quote=mwitt;344753and it appears they don't have a definite answer as a bridge to get the ball to Billy Wagner. [/quote]

Good observations here, but just wanted to point out that the Mets get Duaner Sanchez back this year after his freak accident, and I think he was really missed last year.
isucyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.


vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com and Jeremy Lind - All rights reserved 2005-08. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of Cy