CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic > General - Non ISU > Pro Sports
Forgot Password? | Sign Up!
Register Members Mark Forums Read

Notices

Please help support CF, Donate Today!

» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
» ISU FB Info
ISU 2-9 (0-7)
vs
KSU 4-6 (1-5)

Sat, Nov 22nd
2:30 PM CST
Manhattan, KS

TV: FCS; DTV Ch 617, Mediacom Ch 173
Advertise Here


» 2008 Iowa State Mens Basketball
I-State at Hawaii:
Sat, Nov 24th 11:00pm CST | TV: TBA
Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2008, 12:38 PM   #61
Addict
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by ISUboi12 View Post
i noticed that the yankees play the university of south florida and virginia tech before spring training... is that normal?
Yeah, the teams down there often play local college teams. The Red Sox normally play Boston College in Fenway as well...

cybsball20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:38 PM   #62
Hall-Of-Famer
 
Send a message via AIM to mwitt Send a message via MSN to mwitt Send a message via Yahoo to mwitt
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by clonerules View Post
the braves will be sending 8 or 9 legitimate 4th or 5th starters to spring training, so if mike cant throw, they have the depth this year to overcome his loss. as far as the bullpen goes, peter moylan was in the top 5 last year as far as the numbers go for relief pitchers..add in the fact that mike gonzalez should come back and b ready to go in early june, and i feel that the bullpen is solid!! and if he or peter cant get the job done, we always have will ohman
Mike Gonzalez is good when healthy. Moylan had a good year, but relief pitching is the most volatile position in sports. Moylan is pushing 30, and he hadn't done a thing in his career since last year. There are a ton of relievers who pull a great year out of a hat and can never duplicate it. We shall see.
mwitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:39 PM   #63
Hall-Of-Famer
 
Send a message via AIM to mwitt Send a message via MSN to mwitt Send a message via Yahoo to mwitt
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
The only team that has worse middle relief then the Braves is the Mets who might have the worst in baseball...
In baseball? I don't know, the Rays and Orioles' bullpens are pretty awful. The Braves bullpen has potential with Mike Gonzalez and Peter Moylan. Potential doesn't mean a thing once the season starts, though.
mwitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:41 PM   #64
All-Star
 
CloneFan65's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by trevn View Post
That all said, the D-Backs, Rockies, and Dodgers will all be very evenly matched, but I see the Dodgers pitching depth being the reason they win the division. Either way, it should be a fun year to watch the NL West (the most competitive division in baseball IMO).
Not only the most competitive, but probably the best division top to bottom. Other than the Giants the whole division should be in the playoff hunt until the end. And there's no division with more quality arms. It'll be a fun season.

We should look for our heroes every morning in the bathroom mirror. - Bill "Spaceman" Lee
CloneFan65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:42 PM   #65
Starter
 
clonerules's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
The only team that has worse middle relief then the Braves is the Mets who might have the worst in baseball...

as much as i respect your opinions, especially when it comes to baseball, i am gonna have to disagree. the braves finished in third behind the padres and the cubs last year in team pitching. call me a homer, but i just dont c it...
clonerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:46 PM   #66
Addict
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by mwitt View Post
In baseball? I don't know, the Rays and Orioles' bullpens are pretty awful. The Braves bullpen has potential with Mike Gonzalez and Peter Moylan. Potential doesn't mean a thing once the season starts, though.
Salas and Dohrmann are pretty solid and Wheeler has POTENTIAL to be good again, but we'll see... The Orioles, well their bad, but they do have a couple of decent lefty specialists...

cybsball20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:46 PM   #67
All-Star
 
CloneFan65's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
I think the Tigers might have something to say about that... Any lineup with a Hall of Famer batting 9th is pretty scary...
And they just signed a former 22 game winner as their number 4 starter.

We should look for our heroes every morning in the bathroom mirror. - Bill "Spaceman" Lee
CloneFan65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:56 PM   #68
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by trevn View Post
That all said, the D-Backs, Rockies, and Dodgers will all be very evenly matched, but I see the Dodgers pitching depth being the reason they win the division. Either way, it should be a fun year to watch the NL West (the most competitive division in baseball IMO).
Weren't you the one that late last year were commenting about the issues that the Dodgers organization was having? Something to the effect that the older players such as Kent were feeling threatened by the up and coming players or vice versa and it was causing some kind of disharmony (and eventually was what blew the Dodgers' playoff chances)? I'm not saying the Dodgers don't have the deepest team in the NL West, and I'm not saying they haven't put the issues to bed, but team chemistry issues will always trump depth, and if the players on the Dodgers haven't learned to "know their role and shut their mouths," so to speak, then it could be a long year at Chavez Ravine.

Attempt #2
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:57 PM   #69
Addict
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by clonerules View Post
as much as i respect your opinions, especially when it comes to baseball, i am gonna have to disagree. the braves finished in third behind the padres and the cubs last year in team pitching. call me a homer, but i just dont c it...
The Braves top guys in appearances last year were Moylan (very solid) then Yates (5.18 era, .251 baa, 1.44 whip) and Villarreal who they lost. I don't think they added anyone great, I could be wrong...

cybsball20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:02 PM   #70
Hall-Of-Famer
 
Send a message via AIM to mwitt Send a message via MSN to mwitt Send a message via Yahoo to mwitt
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
The Braves top guys in appearances last year were Moylan (very solid) then Yates (5.18 era, .251 baa, 1.44 whip) and Villarreal who they lost. I don't think they added anyone great, I could be wrong...
Mike Gonzalez will be key.
mwitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:03 PM   #71
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
I think the Tigers might have something to say about that... Any lineup with a Hall of Famer batting 9th is pretty scary...
Originally Posted by CloneFan65 View Post
And they just signed a former 22 game winner as their number 4 starter.
And for all of us Twins fans out there, this is exactly why the Twins didn't trade Santana to the Red Sox or the Yankees for players that are going to help us in the near term or hold onto him in hopes that we would be in the race at the end of the season. With all of the Tigers' free agent signings (on a team that was pretty good to begin with) and how stacked the Indians are, we were not going to compete for the AL Central and likely not the Wildcard in 2008 and probably not for 2009. At this point it's better to punt (and this kind of punt is one of those "field coverage" punts that pins the opponent inside the 10) and start playing for 2010 than to go head-on with teams that you know you are going to lose out to in the near term and then have your short-term decisions also affect your long-term ones.

Attempt #2
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:44 PM   #72
All-Star
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
Umm... Have you looked at your pitching staff? Smoltz's, Glavine's Hampton's, and Hudson's rookie seasons weren't exactly 5 years ago. Chipper Jones ain't exactly a young one, either. Francoeur intrigues me - last year was the first year he actually put any kind of numbers up. Was that an anomaly, or has he finally learned how to be productive in the Major League batting box? One season of good (but not great) numbers won't exactly convince me.

I will admit, Texiera, Escobar, and McCann are all interesting pieces.
Interesting.... I wonder how a guy puts up numbers in previous seasons, when it was his second year in the league and his first year he didn't come into the league until after the all star break. In that year he batted .300 w/ 14 bombs. The key to the Braves season is to keep the guys healthy. Chipper, Hampton, Hudson, Smoltz all have to stay healthy in order for them to make a run. They have a lot of young talent w/ Francouer, McCain, Escobar, Johnson, and Texeria
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 02:02 PM   #73
All-Star
Donor 
 
drmwevr08's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Anyone else a fan of B'more, Toronto or Tampa (right) and wanting to see them play but not at all concerned about the playoffs cause you aint makin it?

I vote for realignment!

drmwevr08 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 02:30 PM   #74
Hall-Of-Famer
 
CrossCyed's Avatar
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

If the purported Joe Crede/Matt Cain deal goes down, the White Sox become relevant again.

Of course, reports have said either Cain or Noah Lowry....and the two aren't quite the same....


Visit the blog...
If you're at all interested about blogging about ISU, and you don't suck as a writer, let me know, as I'm always looking for help.
CrossCyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 03:44 PM   #75
Starter
 
Re: Too early to talk MLB?

Brewers in the Central, the Cubs made the most flashy acquisitions but overall the Brewers are just full of young talent, quite a bit of which now has experience under its belt. Should be an interesting race but I think the Brewers are better. Mmmmm Cory Hart
Iastfan112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.


vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com and Jeremy Lind - All rights reserved 2005-08. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of CycloneFanatic.com, Jeremy Lind or Iowa State University. The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the University protected by the trademark and copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries and are used on this web site under license from the University. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0