CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic > General - Non ISU > Pro Sports
Forgot Password? | Sign Up!
Register Members Mark Forums Read

Notices



Advertise Here
» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
» 2008 Iowa State Football
ISU vs Kent State:
Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2008, 09:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Hall-Of-Famer
 
guitarchitect7's Avatar
 
Question Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

Depending on who you talk to and who your talking about, many critics debate over whether Japanese players should be considered for Rookie of the Year awards. They stem from a country that embraces the sport just the same as us, yet because they've never set foot on American Soil, their status exemplifies that.

Where's the difference between them and all these Central American Players. The trend seems to fall on the imediate impact that Japanese players provide. Most don't make their way through the farm system ranks, and end up usually securing a starting role from day one. But this was the point of getting them right! Dice-K and Fukudome weren't acquired to ride the bench now were they.

Rules are rules, you can't agrue that. But if you had the authority to change them, would you?

"You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace." -- Ernie Banks
""Work is done, and then forgotten. Therefore it lasts forever." - Lao Tzu

Last edited by guitarchitect7; 02-01-2008 at 09:14 AM.
guitarchitect7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:14 AM   #2 (permalink)
Pro
 
SuperCy's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

The only problem I have with it is the fans voting. You get a Japanese player that's in the running and it's pretty much over. The Japanese fans will vote early and often for their guy. Who stands a chance of winning when a whole nation is voting against you?



What ever happened to truth, justice and the American Way?
SuperCy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Hall-Of-Famer
 
isuno1fan's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

New to the league = Rookie

Yes..they can be eligible for the award and should continue to be IMO.
isuno1fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Hall-Of-Famer
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

Fans don't vote for Rookie of the Year...

cybsball20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:18 AM   #5 (permalink)
Pro
 
SuperCy's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
Fans don't vote for Rookie of the Year...
My bad. I was thinking MVP?



What ever happened to truth, justice and the American Way?
SuperCy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Hall-Of-Famer
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

Originally Posted by SuperCy View Post
My bad. I was thinking MVP?
Fans only vote for all star starters, all other awards are awarded by the baseball writers association...

cybsball20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:21 AM   #7 (permalink)
Hall-Of-Famer
 
cybsball20's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

Japaneese baseball is about the equivelent to AAA 1/2. So I think they should be in consideration for Rookie of the year as they still haven't played at this level....

cybsball20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Pro
 
SuperCy's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
Fans only vote for all star starters, all other awards are awarded by the baseball writers association...
OK. I'll shut up now.



What ever happened to truth, justice and the American Way?
SuperCy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Starter
 
drmwevr08's Avatar
 
Re: Should Japanese Players be Considered for Rooke of the Year

I don't care about ROY I just think they should decide once and for all if they are going to go by their first name or their last and put the appropriate one on the jersey... So confusing
drmwevr08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.


vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com and Jeremy Lind - All rights reserved 2005-08. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of CycloneFanatic.com, Jeremy Lind or Iowa State University. The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the University protected by the trademark and copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries and are used on this web site under license from the University. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28