Frankly I'm not pulling for him. I don't think he should get in as a player. All of the sentiment for him getting in lately has come from his work as an announcer and because people feel bad for him due to his physical conditions. Based on what he did on the field, I say no way.
Obviously a cub fan slant... but they back it up with numbers... Oh well... The sad thing is these crotchety old bastards will probably vote him in after he is dead, even though Ronnie wants this more than anything... they just won't give it to him.
Right here. I love Santo, but I don't think he is a HOF game. The numbers are not there, and I don't think he has much of a postseason resume to make up for that fact.
"Dog Eat Dog"
Read the news
Someone win,
Someone lose
Obviously a cub fan slant... but they back it up with numbers... Oh well... The sad thing is these crotchety old bastards will probably vote him in after he is dead, even though Ronnie wants this more than anything... they just won't give it to him.
Okay... Did anyone actually read these links... If you did you may change your opinion... or just continue to be a Cub hater.
Seriously? Barely better than average... come on now... Isn't anyone gonna help me out here?
I'm not going to lobby either way for Santo since I know very little about him, but I'll help you out to the extent of saying I'm glad the people saying, "He didn't have the numbers," don't have ballots. The value of a player in baseball is often more than his numbers.
Unfortunately, the fact the best relief pitcher of our era (Rich Gossage) was only elected to the HOF last year after 16 ballots tells me many who do have balloting privileges are too lazy to research a player's career. Instead, they rely on a quick scan of his "numbers." Akin to what an average bar hack can study in about 10 minutes.
That tells me the HOF will be in some real trouble when the steroid era guys (and the era-of-inflated-save-guys) become Hall eligible.
Dean Wormer was wrong. Fat, drunk and stupid was a great way to go through college (all five years of it).
Santo was never that good. Barely better than average on mostly very poor teams.
I don't agree with trying to say that he wasn't that good, but I have never considered him to be HOF good. It's the MLB HOF, not the Cubs 3B HOF. There's a big difference and I wouldn't even put him in the top half of the list of fellow candidates - none of whom were selected.
Bookmarks