Oh, you silly Cubs fans. Your stadium is a dump and is in desperate need of renovation, yet you cling to it's 'history' as an excuse. Once stuff starts falling on people's heads (a la the Towers), maybe you'll admit it.
Yep, Wrigley is a dump, all right. After all, we know how long Busch Stadium lasted until it was outdated, and every yard like it.
This wasn't a "favorite" ballpark thread... The thread says "Greatest Ballparks in History"...
For something to be historical: historical
Of or relating to the character of history.
Based on or concerned with events in history.
Used in the past: historical costumes; historical weapons.
Important or famous in history. See Usage Note at historic.
I think Old Bush might have some history to it... New Bush, while it looks to be an incredibly beautiful stadium, and a great place to play baseball, is not yet historical.
You are right is says greatest parks in history, not most historical parks. I think any ball park currently built would have been built in the past. I think any current or past ball parks should be allowed.
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com - All rights reserved 2005-09. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of CycloneFanatic.com or Iowa State University. The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the University protected by the trademark and copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries and are used on this web site under license from the University. Original site design, premise & construction by Jeremy Lind.