Re: CF: Rep vs Credits - Rep Feedback Needed | |
I think one thing we're lacking is a clear view of the purpose of the rep points. IMO, the rep points are for giving a user a general idea of how reasonable another user is, not whether or not you agree with the user. Rep points should only be taken away when people post things that are inflammatory, misleading, or deceiving. In order to make the the rep points accomplish this goal, the rep points need to be handed out slowly over many posts by the user, so there should be a limit on how much rep a person can get on a particular post.
I like the current "Reputation User Spread", which effectively prevents any one user from setting out on a vendetta to ruin another user's rep.
I also like the idea of a rep cap. At some point extra rep does become meaningless.
I also like that people with more rep get more "rep power", but it should be changed to something like a tier system, where you can give say 100 rep points if you have +rep, 200 rep points if you're over 10,000 rep, 400 rep points if you're over 100,000 rep, or something like that.
Just my thoughts...
|