Reading through this thread from people that appear to be engineer grads, it looks like the most popular are a math prof or Sturges (I never had him, but he did have a reputation), so I'll continue that trend. :wink:
I had a math prof for Calc 165 that I assumed no longer taught, because I took that course in 1989. Oops, checked the ISU site, still there, Roger Maddux. :no: I see in looking at his bio, that he graduated from Berkeley, he definately fits the Berkeley stereotype.
I probably in retrospect wasn't quite ready for calc right out of high school, but this guy certainly didn't help any. He talked alot about theory and didn't seem to do many problems in class. My biggest pet peeve by far were his tests. They were true-false exams, that's right true-false calculus examinations.
Some of the questions were like:
Theorem 2.1.1 in the textbook states this: blah blah blah, true or false, who cares?
The derivative of (insert long string of variables) is this (another long string of variables), true or false Usually here he would change a plus sign to a minus sign or something to that effect to make it false.
Each exam had 20 questions. If you answered the question correctly, you received 2 points, so 40 possible. If you answered the question incorrectly, you received 0 points. If you did not answer the question at all, you received 1 point.
During every exam there would be at least one student who sat around for five minutes, walked up and turned in a blank exam and got 20/40 for not trying. I remember once getting a 22/40 or something like that and thinking Why the hell did I even try?
Anyway that was my indoctrination to college math and if anybody is still reading this thanks for listening to my almost 20 year old rant!
I had a math prof for Calc 165 that I assumed no longer taught, because I took that course in 1989. Oops, checked the ISU site, still there, Roger Maddux. :no: I see in looking at his bio, that he graduated from Berkeley, he definately fits the Berkeley stereotype.
I probably in retrospect wasn't quite ready for calc right out of high school, but this guy certainly didn't help any. He talked alot about theory and didn't seem to do many problems in class. My biggest pet peeve by far were his tests. They were true-false exams, that's right true-false calculus examinations.
Some of the questions were like:
Theorem 2.1.1 in the textbook states this: blah blah blah, true or false, who cares?
The derivative of (insert long string of variables) is this (another long string of variables), true or false Usually here he would change a plus sign to a minus sign or something to that effect to make it false.
Each exam had 20 questions. If you answered the question correctly, you received 2 points, so 40 possible. If you answered the question incorrectly, you received 0 points. If you did not answer the question at all, you received 1 point.
During every exam there would be at least one student who sat around for five minutes, walked up and turned in a blank exam and got 20/40 for not trying. I remember once getting a 22/40 or something like that and thinking Why the hell did I even try?
Anyway that was my indoctrination to college math and if anybody is still reading this thanks for listening to my almost 20 year old rant!