Tempo-Free Stats
- Thread starter CrossCyed
- Start date
Thru the Bama game, and our sudden offensive outburst.
PPWS
1. CJohnson 1.37
2. Clark 1.30
3. Petersen 1.23
4. Hubalek 1.09
5. WJohnson 1.08
6. Brackins 1.06
7. Garrett .86
8. Thompson .75
9. Boozer .63
10. Haluska .42
eFG
1. CJohnson 66.7%
2. Clark 62.7%
3. Petersen 57.5%
4. WJohnson 51.9%
5. Hubalek 50.9%
6. Brackins 48.7%
7. Thompson 38.2%
8. Boozer 35.6%
9. Garrett 32.4%
10. Haluska 18.9%
CoJo rockets up the charts, as does Jiri.
PPWS
1. CJohnson 1.37
2. Clark 1.30
3. Petersen 1.23
4. Hubalek 1.09
5. WJohnson 1.08
6. Brackins 1.06
7. Garrett .86
8. Thompson .75
9. Boozer .63
10. Haluska .42
eFG
1. CJohnson 66.7%
2. Clark 62.7%
3. Petersen 57.5%
4. WJohnson 51.9%
5. Hubalek 50.9%
6. Brackins 48.7%
7. Thompson 38.2%
8. Boozer 35.6%
9. Garrett 32.4%
10. Haluska 18.9%
CoJo rockets up the charts, as does Jiri.
Thru the Nebraska game...
PPWS
1. C Johnson 1.33
2. Clark 1.25
3. W Johnson 1.11
4. Hubalek 1.10
5. Petersen 1.09
6. Brackins 1.08
7. Garrett 0.84
8. Thompson 0.81
9. Boozer 0.75
9. Lee 0.75
11. Haluska 0.63
eFG
1. C Johnson 63.2%
2. Clark 59.5%
3. W Johnson 52.1%
4. Brackins 50.7%
5. Petersen 50.5%
6. Hubalek 49.7%
7. Boozer 39.3%
8. Thompson 39.0%
9. Garrett 35.7%
10. Lee 30.0 %
11. Haluska 28.7%
PPWS
1. C Johnson 1.33
2. Clark 1.25
3. W Johnson 1.11
4. Hubalek 1.10
5. Petersen 1.09
6. Brackins 1.08
7. Garrett 0.84
8. Thompson 0.81
9. Boozer 0.75
9. Lee 0.75
11. Haluska 0.63
eFG
1. C Johnson 63.2%
2. Clark 59.5%
3. W Johnson 52.1%
4. Brackins 50.7%
5. Petersen 50.5%
6. Hubalek 49.7%
7. Boozer 39.3%
8. Thompson 39.0%
9. Garrett 35.7%
10. Lee 30.0 %
11. Haluska 28.7%
And, through the end of the season.
PPWS
1. C Johnson (1.35)
2. Petersen (1.13)
3. Clark (1.12)
4. Hubalek (1.07)
5. W Johnson (1.03)
6. Brackins (1.01)
7. Haluska (0.91)
8. Garrett (0.87)
9. Boozer (0.80)
10. Thompson (0.78)
eFG%
1. C Johnson (65.1)
2. Petersen (53.6)
3. Clark (52.5)
4. Hubalek (48.5)
5. W Johnson (47.7)
6. Brackins (46.7)
7. Haluska (42.2)
8. Boozer (41.7)
9. Thompson (38.5)
10. Garrett (37.4)
PPWS
1. C Johnson (1.35)
2. Petersen (1.13)
3. Clark (1.12)
4. Hubalek (1.07)
5. W Johnson (1.03)
6. Brackins (1.01)
7. Haluska (0.91)
8. Garrett (0.87)
9. Boozer (0.80)
10. Thompson (0.78)
eFG%
1. C Johnson (65.1)
2. Petersen (53.6)
3. Clark (52.5)
4. Hubalek (48.5)
5. W Johnson (47.7)
6. Brackins (46.7)
7. Haluska (42.2)
8. Boozer (41.7)
9. Thompson (38.5)
10. Garrett (37.4)
I've got new numbers for this season:
PPWS
1. Hamilton 1.7
2. Vanderbeken 1.3
3. Staiger 1.2
4. Petersen 1.1
4. Thompson 1.1
6. Brackins 1.0
6. Garrett 1.0
6. Eikmeier 1.0
9. Haluska 0.9
10. Buckley 0.5
eFG%
1. Hamilton 63.6%
2. Thompson 56.3%
3. Vanderbeken 51.3%
4. Brackins 48.1%
5. Staiger 41.1%
6. Petersen 40.4%
7. Garrett 40.0%
8. Eikmeier 36.2%
9. Haluska 34.1%
10. Buckley 25.0%
As well as fun team stuff:
Team Ranks (Big XII/National Rank - of 341)
FG% - 43.9%
12/157
2FG% - 48.9%
10/127
3FG% - 36.6%
6/93
eFG% - 51.3%
9/110
PPWS - 1.07
10/125
FT% - 67.1%
9/201
TOPG - 11.7
2/24
APG - 15.2
6/72
A/TO - 1.295
2/26
FG% D - 37.8%
1/24
2FG% D - 41.5%
4/34
3FG% D - 31.1%
3/81
TO Forced - 11.3
12/325
RPG - 32.5
9/150
BPG - 4.2
7/78
FPG - 16.2
1/46
Possessions per 40 minutes - 65.6
10/272
Offensive Points Per Possession - .988
11/156
Defensive Points Per Possession - .912
8/172
-----
What's that all mean? I think it says we're a good team defensively, but our offense is neither good, nor efficient, which, if you've watched the team at all, is obvious.
Our possessions per 40 minutes, which says that we play a really slow pace, would definitely go up if we forced any turnovers at all. Of course, missed shots could be considered turnovers, but a steal now and then sure wouldn't hurt.
PPWS
1. Hamilton 1.7
2. Vanderbeken 1.3
3. Staiger 1.2
4. Petersen 1.1
4. Thompson 1.1
6. Brackins 1.0
6. Garrett 1.0
6. Eikmeier 1.0
9. Haluska 0.9
10. Buckley 0.5
eFG%
1. Hamilton 63.6%
2. Thompson 56.3%
3. Vanderbeken 51.3%
4. Brackins 48.1%
5. Staiger 41.1%
6. Petersen 40.4%
7. Garrett 40.0%
8. Eikmeier 36.2%
9. Haluska 34.1%
10. Buckley 25.0%
As well as fun team stuff:
Team Ranks (Big XII/National Rank - of 341)
FG% - 43.9%
12/157
2FG% - 48.9%
10/127
3FG% - 36.6%
6/93
eFG% - 51.3%
9/110
PPWS - 1.07
10/125
FT% - 67.1%
9/201
TOPG - 11.7
2/24
APG - 15.2
6/72
A/TO - 1.295
2/26
FG% D - 37.8%
1/24
2FG% D - 41.5%
4/34
3FG% D - 31.1%
3/81
TO Forced - 11.3
12/325
RPG - 32.5
9/150
BPG - 4.2
7/78
FPG - 16.2
1/46
Possessions per 40 minutes - 65.6
10/272
Offensive Points Per Possession - .988
11/156
Defensive Points Per Possession - .912
8/172
-----
What's that all mean? I think it says we're a good team defensively, but our offense is neither good, nor efficient, which, if you've watched the team at all, is obvious.
Our possessions per 40 minutes, which says that we play a really slow pace, would definitely go up if we forced any turnovers at all. Of course, missed shots could be considered turnovers, but a steal now and then sure wouldn't hurt.
How bot a new thread for this info, I started reading the first post and almost disregarded it because I saw some former players listed and figured you didn't know what you were talking about.
Thanks for the info. +1
Thanks for the info. +1
Interesting that we're still bottom of the barrel as far as offense goes, but the defense continues to be the strong point. I hope that keeps us in a lot of conference games this year.
I like the shots our defense is forcing the other teams to take against us...I just want to see us do a better job of keeping them off the offensive boards- that is a killer for morale when you do your job for 30-35 seconds and a split-second lapse makes it all for not :sad: I'm sure you'll continue to see this emphasized in practice from McDermott...
