Wells Fargo needs $15 billion in new capital

erikbj

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
7,505
648
113
45
hiawatha, ia
these capital requirements in for worse case scenarios. They should be fine, pending the world doesn't blow up
 

alaskaguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,203
220
63
these capital requirements in for worse case scenarios. They should be fine, pending the world doesn't blow up
Whose kool-aid have you been drinking? The conditions that were stressed aren't far from the economic conditions that we are currently facing. They don't even border on being worse case scenarios.
 

galactawitz

Active Member
Nov 27, 2007
801
106
43
Ames
The government said worst case. 10.3 unemployment and an additional 22% decline in house prices. If it gets much worse than that we're all pretty much up a creak anyway.
 

alaskaguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,203
220
63
The government said worst case. 10.3 unemployment and an additional 22% decline in house prices. If it gets much worse than that we're all pretty much up a creak anyway.
The stress tests are already behind the curve ball. For example, the first quarters' unemployment rate of 8.1% is higher than the stress tests "worst case" scenario of 7.9% for the same period. At the rate of job losses we are experiencing, we will surpass a 10.3% unemployment rate this year- the stress test's worst possible scenario for 2010.

And there are a number of respected economists that are forecasting worse numbers than those.
 
Last edited:

sunset

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
2,833
1,007
113
San Diego, CA
I don't want this to head to the cave, but this "stress test" is, in my opinion, nothing more than politics. A continuation of governmental power grab (and it's not limited to one party or the other).

Guess what most banks are going to have to do to raise the type of equity the govt now demands? That's right, convert the govt's preferred stock (which WF didn't want to give out in the first place, nice that the govt forced them to accept a govt infusion and not allow them to pay it back except under some unknown set of circumsatnces) to common stock. Guess what happens at that point? The government owns huge chunks of these institutions.

Nothing like changing the rules of the game whenever you choose.
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
6,926
2,950
113
48
Tempe, az
And there are a number of respected economists that are forecasting worse numbers than those.

And perhaps the most respected investor in the world said that WF was the strongest around and would be just fine. Who knows who is right.
 

erikbj

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
7,505
648
113
45
hiawatha, ia
Whose kool-aid have you been drinking? The conditions that were stressed aren't far from the economic conditions that we are currently facing. They don't even border on being worse case scenarios.

wall street doesn't seem too concerned since they are all up 20%
 

sunset

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
2,833
1,007
113
San Diego, CA
I do business with WF. I think they are cooking their books and a person who I do business with inside WF thinks that as well. How bad? Not sure, but they are creative!

You should be pretty sure before you say something like that. Also, cooking the books could mean a lot of things. Since you've put some thought in to this, please explain what you think they are doing.
 

jmb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
19,315
8,762
113
wall street doesn't seem too concerned since they are all up 20%
at what point did wall street show evidence that there was a problem? your statement is like asking a 479 lb fat guy if he is worried about his health...
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
59,528
21,043
113
Macomb, MI
I don't want this to head to the cave, but this "stress test" is, in my opinion, nothing more than politics. A continuation of governmental power grab (and it's not limited to one party or the other).

Guess what most banks are going to have to do to raise the type of equity the govt now demands? That's right, convert the govt's preferred stock (which WF didn't want to give out in the first place, nice that the govt forced them to accept a govt infusion and not allow them to pay it back except under some unknown set of circumsatnces) to common stock. Guess what happens at that point? The government owns huge chunks of these institutions.

Nothing like changing the rules of the game whenever you choose.

darthVader.jpg


"I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
6,926
2,950
113
48
Tempe, az
And that individual can hardly be impartial on this topic.

Not that I care either way, but the 'respected economists' just dont have enough credibility anymore either. If I was concerned I'd rather follow Warrens money than the opinion of a guy who, if he's wrong, will only justify it as something unforseeable.