What salary makes one wealthy in Iowa?

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
A $200k family might pay $37k in taxes for fed and state. If a family is making $50k, the taxes they pay by proportion and rightfully are much less. Taxes is one equalizer. Sometimes the people with the largest income are paying off their houses much fast with their extra income.

No doubt if cars and house are paid off, a small income will suffice.

One big money spender is to fund/put multiple kids through college and let them come out the other side with little or no debt.

So when a family pulling in good bucks reach 55, they may be piling up a lot of extra savings.

200k-37k > 50k-anything. Equalizer?

If a family makes 200k and isn't wealthy then they wouldn't be wealthy no matter what they made.
 

capitalcityguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
8,339
2,126
113
Des Moines
Your house, your car. If you can get by cheap on those two and make as a household 50 to 70 K, take home. You can have your million dollars in 25 to 30 years.

This is a true statement, but it certainly doesn't define "wealthy"....especially in 25- 30 years.

25 - 30 years a person is going to need multiple millions banked just to maintain their standard of living during retirement years.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
Even though money is a essential, and more makes it easier to live (if you are smart with your money). The thing that I think makes me wealthy is my family. Nothing makes me happier.

I agree with this. I just wish I had a little extra coin to spoil my family with a vacation now and then.
 

capitalcityguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
8,339
2,126
113
Des Moines
My definition of wealthy: zero financial stress. Otherwords, no alarm clock (free time), no schedule (go wherever and do whatever) & no boss ( call your own shots). Example#1 : I have a friend who owns the sky box on the 50 yard line at Jack Trice, he bought Johnny Orr's place in town when Johnny left so he would have a place to stay on Saturdays. Owns several homes in several locations in US. Travels world wide extensively. Retired in his 50's. Example #2 : we go South in the Winter and I visit with local fulltime habitants. There are people "living the life" of no stress with not much net worth but little needs in exotic places. Bottom line=wealth is dependant upon individual consumption/wants.

I would argue that this isn't wealthy, (less the skybox), this is how middle class individuals who saved for retirement live once they retire. You've just described my parents and my wife's parents (post- retirement)
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
7,711
3,730
113
Arizona
I think there are a lot of bits of good advice but those who think they have it figured out and that everyone can do the same have oversimplified. Yes, avoiding car loans would save money but when you have to tote kids around, travel a lot, etc, it may be worth it (at least to some) to have a nicer vehicle. (I would not trust most vans that I could have bought with cash to get my wife and kids back and forth on 12 hour raod trips for instance). If it works for you, great, just don't insult those who have different priorities.

Also, I love that $1.3B = $1400M. Must be the exchange rate? :wink:
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
I somewhat disagree with this. If you can buy that asset correctly, you will be just fine with a car loan. The problem is that far too many people don't push hard enough when buying these new cars. The last one I bought, I paid 71% of sticker. I can live with that. When penciled out, I cannot see myself ever getting upside down on that vehicle.

What car was it and when did you buy?
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
200k-37k > 50k-anything. Equalizer?

If a family makes $200k and isn't wealthy then they wouldn't be wealthy no matter what they made.

I was pointing out that if you make more money you end up paying more out from a percentage of income standpoint.

With less money you have a progressive tax system that does help out to get by with less income.

One thing that I find surprising is some states tax food and others do nto. I do not believe food should be taxed.

I think we are talking well off for $200k and wealthy for the JTS skybox fellow.
 

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
My definition of wealthy: zero financial stress. Otherwords, no alarm clock (free time), no schedule (go wherever and do whatever) & no boss ( call your own shots). Example#1 : I have a friend who owns the sky box on the 50 yard line at Jack Trice, he bought Johnny Orr's place in town when Johnny left so he would have a place to stay on Saturdays. Owns several homes in several locations in US. Travels world wide extensively. Retired in his 50's. Example #2 : we go South in the Winter and I visit with local fulltime habitants. There are people "living the life" of no stress with not much net worth but little needs in exotic places. Bottom line=wealth is dependant upon individual consumption/wants.

That's not a bad way to look at things. My goals are pretty similar however don't feel the need to own that many nice houses or to have a sky box.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,473
19,649
113
Live boring life but you're debt free. Get hit by bus tomorrow say to self, "Self why didnt we do more fun things in life?" Costs too much:confused:

Disagree. I pretty much do all of those things listed, but that's because I don't give a crap about the kind of car I drive, the things I do for fun are pretty much free, and I value the freedom of living with very little debt. I don't think my life is boring, and I love every minute of it.
 

Ficklone02

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,702
377
83
City by the Bay
Disagree. I pretty much do all of those things listed, but that's because I don't give a crap about the kind of car I drive, the things I do for fun are pretty much free, and I value the freedom of living with very little debt. I don't think my life is boring, and I love every minute of it.
Speaking of cheap entertainment, I paid for my football tix yesterday....not so cheap anymore! I guess I will assume that all of your entertainment is pretty much free, with the exception of isu events. :smile:
 

JCloned

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2006
1,721
660
113
Depends on where in IA you live. I live in DSM suburbs and lived in a couple major metro areas out of state and was shocked to find it cost me about $100,000 more for the same house I had before in DSM. Average Cost of Homes from stats isn't out of line, but "suburbia" costs are much higher than most non eastcoast/california parts of nation.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,473
19,649
113
Speaking of cheap entertainment, I paid for my football tix yesterday....not so cheap anymore! I guess I will assume that all of your entertainment is pretty much free, with the exception of isu events. :smile:

They pretty much are - I basically hang out with friends and play sports at places it's free to compete. I would say easily my biggest entertainment expense other than ISU is eating out and my wife and I only do that about once a week.
 

Ficklone02

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,702
377
83
City by the Bay
They pretty much are - I basically hang out with friends and play sports at places it's free to compete. I would say easily my biggest entertainment expense other than ISU is eating out and my wife and I only do that about once a week.
Thats cool. If only our gov't would budget itself like you.:sad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: CP44

JCloned

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2006
1,721
660
113
200k-37k > 50k-anything. Equalizer?

If a family makes 200k and isn't wealthy then they wouldn't be wealthy no matter what they made.

Not really accurate it so depends on your situation:

consider: First 200 is proabably more like 45 in taxes all in for most peoples filing situation so you are at 155 after tax. Max out 401K contribution takes out maybe 10,000 assuming company contribution to get you up to tax ded limit

145/12= approx 12,000/month

Typical DSM suburbian mortgage $2700/month (figure low equity to allow for 2nd's)
Two cars (van, plus aver 2nd) on 60 month loans $1200/mo

Assume two teenagers with cars...they pay for car, you get stuck with insurance
$800/month

Charity/Church/Giving (since average is less than 10% tithe lets say $12,000 annually not $20,000....so thats $1000/month

Utilities/Phone/Cell/Cable
$300/$50/$250/$100 for total of $700

Gas/Groceries/Household maintenance
$250/$750/$500 total of $1500

One student in college (at $200,000+ financial aid is virtually nonexistent)
$1500/month if they go to state school

Now you are down to $2600/month left over for Football tickets/BB tickets, money for vacation, health care out of pocket, all the fees you get hit with for kids sports and schools, kids clothing, clothing for you and your spouse....

now is this poor/struggling no, I am not saying that, but wealthy, not by US standards
 

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,601
5,943
113
50131
Here's something else I think about this argument. I will spend money now. I am young, I want to do things and I want to be able to do it now. I don't have a huge interest in traveling the world or doing a lot of the same things normal retired people do when I get older. In fact, I will likely never really retire. I want to be able to have my motorcycle, nice snowmobile and go on my snowmobile trips while I can. I actually see myself really living cheaper later in life. I have worked hard since I was in high school to get where I am now and while I have the opportunities I will take them rather than have a **** ton of money when I am old and don't have the ability. In the end, it depends on what you want to do and when you want to do it. After all, money means nothing if you don't use it to enjoy it. How you enjoy it is your prerogative.

A lot of people have that mindset....then they get old.

I agree that you should have fun when you're young. In my younger days I had PWC's, quads, bike, sports cars, etc.

With that being said I think saving should be your #1 priority and these things can come second. I remember being 20 something and driving my 89' Honda Accord thinking "as soon as I make some money I'm going to buy a sports car and then I'll be happy". Well a few years later I bought a brand new Nissan 350z. I loved the car and it was a lot of fun but a year later I was thinking to myself "as soon as I make some money I'm going to buy a Mercedes". I never bought the MB but I can tell you that after you buy something, a few months later you'll start dreaming of some other toy to buy. I still do this today. I have a Honda 919 that really is the perfect bike for me. It only costs about $5K when I bought it, it's pretty quick, and 100% reliable. The bike I'd like to replace it with, a $16K Ducati. It absolutely would make no sense for me to buy that bike but I want it. 10 years ago I would have just went and bought the bike and said screw it. Now I think about things like how many years that $16K would take off my mortgage, or how good I would feel by leaving that $16K in my emergency fund. I still have a long way to go when it comes to being thrifty but I've always funded my retirement first and then bought toys later.


As far as living cheaper later in life. Believe me, it most likely won't happen. Then you'll turn 40-50 and realize you're in a crappy position where you have very little retirement, no emergency fund, no equity in your house, etc. My wife and I decided to not have kids and it doesn't sound like you have them either but what if you decide to have kids? Wouldn't it be nice to fund their education. Well you won't be able to fund their education because you'll be so far behind in your retirement.

The little bit you save now in your 401K is huge compared to starting later. There are tons of stats on this but a lot of young people just ignore the facts. My first year out of college I made $20K/year and still managed to put 10% in my 401K. These were also some of the best times of my life. I've found very little correlation between how much I make and happiness. Things like good friends and cheap beer go a long way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CP44

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
I somewhat disagree with this. If you can buy that asset correctly, you will be just fine with a car loan. The problem is that far too many people don't push hard enough when buying these new cars. The last one I bought, I paid 71% of sticker. I can live with that. When penciled out, I cannot see myself ever getting upside down on that vehicle.

If you tried to sell it the next day would you make or lose money? It would be close.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
My life is not boring because I drive a crappy car and have a crappy cell phone. I actually do alot of things, but you are right, for a relatively short period of time it could suck. It is all about what excites you.

Travel and family activities excite me, not cell phones and cars...

I have a crappy phone and plan as well. I have no idea why someone would pay $150/month for an iphone and service. Granted, if you can afford it, fine, but I still don't get it.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
I was pointing out that if you make more money you end up paying more out from a percentage of income standpoint.

With less money you have a progressive tax system that does help out to get by with less income.

One thing that I find surprising is some states tax food and others do nto. I do not believe food should be taxed.

I think we are talking well off for $200k and wealthy for the JTS skybox fellow.

I agree with all that you wrote.
 

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,601
5,943
113
50131
Car buying usually comes down to something like this.

MSRP=$20K
You pay=$17K

A year later you try to sell it.

As someone who is in the market for your type of car am I going to give you $17K for your used vehicle or am I going to go and buy a new one?

Yes, there are rare circumstances like what has happened in this last year where you can get some vehicles for super discounted prices but those big discounted vehicles are also usually the vehicles with the worse resale value.