Big XII Early Preview

isuarch80

Active Member
Sep 25, 2006
1,312
19
38
Dallas, TX
Wow - I don't know how we get this preview:
ESPN.com - NCB - 2007 Big 12 ShootAround: Great expectations

I like how we have a pretty solid recruiting class, including a top 20 player, two top 100-150 players as well, and we got rid of the bad chemistry guys (in terms of playing in the system) and the non-hard workers (even though it was our one legitimate 3 pt shooter – who killed 3 or 4 games for us alone) and replaced them with these talented players and one big guy transfer… how do we go backwards? I don’t get it…

Ah well, it's ESPN - I'm sure EIU will come out as like #3 in the Big 10.
 

bos

Legend
Staff member
Apr 10, 2006
30,641
6,424
113
They pretty much wrote as most of us see it. While I think we will be a better over-all team, we may struggle a bit getting the new recruits accustomed to the style of play and building chemistry. Im sure we will surprise some folks but my expectations are different this year. I expect to see improvements in aspects of play and personal strides. I dont however have expectations to be a top anything team yet much like in football. Build for the future.
 

lennon3

Member
Apr 11, 2006
586
6
18
Well I guess if we finish around top 7 or so in the big 12, which a lot of us feel we can with a good season. That will put McD in the running for Big12 coach of the year since all of the outsiders are really doubting this team!
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,878
30,369
113
Trenchtown
I think we miss taylor big time, he was a great scorer, of which we just don't know if we have any great backcourt scorers. If we get another blalock/stinson combo, we will be fine, if we struggle in the backcourt, we are in trouble. College basketball is a guard based game, we have big question marks there.
 

Drive4cy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
5,541
168
63
972
We can't expect much with all these new faces, especially in the backcourt. Unless Diante can be a special freshman like Will Blalock(which is very rare) I don't see this team doing much. The fact we have talk on here about Sean Haluska starting(or atleast being in the rotation) says it all about our guard play. That's not to disrespect Sean, but he would not get minutes for any top 40 team in America.

We just need to survive this year at a .500 record or slightly better and keep moving forward. We know McDermott can flat out coach, just needs better players. We're close to getting back to where we belong.
 

neo

Member
Aug 23, 2007
206
0
16
Too early to tell. I really think we are going to miss Taylor more than people realize.

I agree. While we won't miss his turnovers, we no longer have anyone in the backcourt(as far as I know) with the ability to create his own offense.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
I agree. While we won't miss his turnovers, we no longer have anyone in the backcourt(as far as I know) with the ability to create his own offense.

Right.

And with the inexperience at the position, we may have the same number of turnovers too. I don't forsee it, but with unknown/inexperienced players, you never know.

Think of the games we won last year because of Taylor lighting a fire for us on offense. Don't have someone like that on our team this year.

Closest guy? Sean Haluska.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
Ummm...Garrett can create on his way to the hoop. Don't be counting on Haluska.
 

neo

Member
Aug 23, 2007
206
0
16
Ummm...Garrett can create on his way to the hoop. Don't be counting on Haluska.

He certainly may be able to. I hope he can. But until he shows it in Big XII competition like MT did, we can't assume that he will.
 

isucyfan

Speechless
Apr 21, 2006
21,369
5,640
113
52
Saint Paul, MN
I think the article is pretty spot on. There may be a pleasant surprise at guard (Garrett or Steiger are promising) but until I see them against good competition, the guard court is a big question mark.

Obviously, the frontcourt is our proven strength right now, and I think we can be successful if we simply have someone at point that controls tempo, passes the ball, and doesn't make many mistakes, even if he doesn't score much. (see: Jacy Holloway)

If we have this and someone that can bomb from the outside (Steiger, Haluska?) we will be OK.

Either way, good or bad, it will be fun to see the kids grow up!
 

kg-cyclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
4,113
164
63
The article is way off....We are much better than we were last year with or without Taylor.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,835
14,795
113
Iowa
I guarantee we're not last next year. I'll bet anything on it. I won't miss Taylor because while he excelled, he did get the offense into the flow very well. People stood around and watched him try to create. Sometimes it was great, but most of the time it was not so great.
 

mwitt

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
5,838
182
63
The article is way off....We are much better than we were last year with or without Taylor.

So will the league. And don't forget that while we had the 7 seed, there were 4 teams who were 6-10 in the conference, so we ranged from 7th to 10th place. And it took a monumental freefall by Oklahoma State to incldue them in that discussion.
 

kg-cyclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
4,113
164
63
So will the league. And don't forget that while we had the 7 seed, there were 4 teams who were 6-10 in the conference, so we ranged from 7th to 10th place. And it took a monumental freefall by Oklahoma State to incldue them in that discussion.

We'll be in the top 8 for sure....Would not surprise me to see us in the top half....just my opinion after watching our guys play this summer....save this thread and I'll see you in March. We are very much under the radar, right where we need to be.
 

wheels686

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,429
292
83
Grinnell, IA
weren't we picked last in the conference in 2000 when we won it and went to the elite 8. These preseason polls are rarely right especially in basketball. I think we will be alot better than what they think. They thought this last year as well. In order for you to have a good preseason ranking you have to have most of your people returning, a good ranking from last season, or really good recruiting class that the outsiders will like
 

cybsball20

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2006
12,735
438
83
Des Moines, IA
You still have to have somone to score the basketball, we won't. I can't see us finishing above the bottom 3. All you need to do is see how we played with Taylor on the bench. It was a bunch of guys waiting for someone to take a shot and ended in shot clock violations or heaves at the buzzer entirely too much.
 

bos

Legend
Staff member
Apr 10, 2006
30,641
6,424
113
You dont think we will have any scorers playing? Somehow I doubt that. I think they gathered some offense threats in the guys we got. Will they be consistant against top teams, probably not. But I am not doubting the talent coming in.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron