Sporting News: OU and A&M may look at SEC

CarrollCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2011
910
494
63
More rumor mongering:

Oklahoma, Texas A&M may look at moving to SEC because of Texas' TV network - NCAA Football - Sporting News
Oklahoma, Texas A&M may look at moving to SEC because of Texas' TV Network
by Matt Hayes, Sporting News

BIRMINGHAM - The continuing evolution of Texas' place in the Big 12 will have far-reaching ramifications -- including the most powerful conference in college football.

A source told Sporting News Wednesday that both Texas A&M and Oklahoma are so concerned about rival Texas gaining a recruiting advantage with the newly-formed Longhorn Network, the two institutions could turn to the SEC if the problems can't be figured out. The core issue: The Longhorn Network will televise live high school football games in the state of Texas, an obvious recruiting advantage for Texas.

SEC commissioner Mike Slive said Wednesday that he will "continue to do what is in the best interest of the SEC."

"It is my job to make sure the SEC is the premiere league," Slive said. "For me to exclude any action that would preclude that from happening would be inappropriate."

Texas A&M and Oklahoma were both in talks with the SEC last summer when Texas was contemplating a move to the Pac-10. The Big 12 eventually made it work in the 11th hour, in part, because of heavyweight Texas' deal to pursue its own television network outside of the league coffers.

Now that the network will include televising high school games in the state of Texas, the dynamics of the Big 12 (and the SEC) could still change. Slive said that he is "comfortable" with the current 12-team SEC, and that it would take a "paradigm shift" for the SEC to expand.

Texas A&M and Oklahoma looking for a new home would be that kind of shift. Moreover, Slive said the SEC's television deals with CBS and ESPN have clauses that allow them to renegotiate if the conference structure changes.

In other words, adding two teams wouldn't mean the SEC is dividing the current revenue pie. It would mean, more than anything, completely restructured deals that would likely dwarf the $2 billion-plus the SEC receives from current CBS and ESPN deals.
 

CarrollCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2011
910
494
63
If Texas really cares about "saving" the Big 12, they'll drop this notion of televising high school games of their recruits.
 

Cyballz

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2009
1,265
926
113
paradigm shift = my conference ain't going above 12 until somebody else does

this isn't going to happen anytime soon
 

CloneState1028

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2008
3,283
107
63
Ames, IA via Cedar Rapids
A&M seems sincerely ****** off. You should read their article on Rivals, it's ridiculous. I almost want this **** to just go down so I can stop hearing about it. Fans of all these schools in the south not named Texas and Baylor feel like this conference is merely a time bomb waiting to explode.
 

longtimeclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2009
7,952
230
63
Up north
I have a hard time believing that the state of Texas would let A&M walk away from the Big 12.

Also, I don't think the Longhorn network really does that much more for Texas recruiting. Maybe for other sports, but not football. Only so many people can play football for Texas.
 

Cyhart

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2009
3,184
132
48
Des Moines
I havent been paying any attention to this "talk" this year.
But, if Okie and A&M leave, that doesnt mean the end of the Big 12 does it?
Could we replace them with a BYU and an Air Force in a jiffy? If so, I'd be ALL for that.
Id just assume not have to play Okie each year. I feel like we already have enough "ringers" on our schedule.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
Meh - I'll believe it when it actually happens anymore. I'm a little tired of reading BS Big 12 doomsday scenarios from certain media members that are just dying for it to happen.
 

cycub51

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 13, 2009
973
931
93
Somewhere Iowa
This is different than a lot of the other articles that state that change is about to happen. This is not just throwing out some **** and seeing if it sticks this article is talking about a specific scenario with the Longhorn network that is not fair. The Longhorn Network should not be able to televise high school games because then those kids see themselves as being represented by Texas and that will give Texas a big advantage in recruiting against Oklahoma and A&M. This won't sway any recruits away from Iowa State because we don't recruit the same kids but it will change the dynamics of recruiting in the Big 12.
 

Cyclonestate78

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2008
12,115
646
113
Nothing more then OU and A&M fans crying foul over Texas having a fan following large enough to allow them to have their own network. If OU and A&M want their own networks then maybe they should focus on building a fanbase and brand that can stand alone. If either of those schools was in a position to start their own network they wouldn't be crying about it.

Bunch of *******.
 

mt85

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,467
129
63
If they go to the SEC and join the big time cheaters, that won't stop Texas from broadcasting high school games. So that advantage for recruits is still going to exist.

If these sore losers would quit crying over what Texas has and join the other Big XII schools in forming a network then maybe they can broadcast high school games as well.

Texas can only bring in 25 recruits a year, thus this is far more about jealousy and egos then actual recruiting advantages.
 

Go2Guy

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2006
8,991
968
113
Houston, TX
For you folks clamoring to drop Iowa because our schedule is too tough, better think more in the future because the B12, in about 3-5 years, ain't going to be what we think / hope it will be.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,444
28,797
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
This is all about pride and bruised egos, which is why I think it will die off. Business sense rules the day, usually.

A&M and OU are making waaaaay more money than they were a year ago, and that number will only go up in 2015. If they go to the SEC, A&M will get their brains beat in and OU will have a MUCH tougher row to hoe. They go to BCS games damn near every year. They'd probably go to half as many in the SEC.

They'll leverage some more money, and they'll stay in the Big 12. This notion of consolidating as many power schools into one conference as possible will fail for a simple reason: a new pecking order will be established, and some large, big name schools will become the new losers.

Either way, I'm a lot more confident in ISU landing on their feet than I was a year ago.
 

UNIGuy4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 11, 2009
9,409
281
113
Anyone know how the new contract with Fox will work if the Big 12 was to lose Texas, OU and A&M or any other members for that notion?
 

Illiniclone

Member
Jan 20, 2009
414
17
18
If the NCAA allows high school games to be televised on that network then I am done with college athletics. That is far and away a major recruiting violation.