Here's a link to the ESPN/ABC News article referring to the NYT article:So here we go! Everyone got their hats and glasses stowed securely? This roller coaster is gonna be a wild one I think.
*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****
- Thread starter CloneFan4
- Start date
- Status
I figure you are probably joking but I am feeling more and more this way every day. That being said I am confident Iowa State will still end up in a BCS conference.
I was under the opinion that BYU only comes with ND, and ND isn't coming. So...?
So if BYU says no and OU says 'well, its been fun'.
UT\TTU\OU\OSU to the PAC-16? (Would Texas or the Pac-10 come to a deal on the LHN?_
Missouri then goes as the 14th member to the SEC, following TAMU.
Left with ISU\KU\KSU\Baylor. ISU\KU\KSU to the big East, Baylor to the MWC?
ISU takes a big pay cut, but its better than non-bcs at least.
UT\TTU\OU\OSU to the PAC-16? (Would Texas or the Pac-10 come to a deal on the LHN?_
Missouri then goes as the 14th member to the SEC, following TAMU.
Left with ISU\KU\KSU\Baylor. ISU\KU\KSU to the big East, Baylor to the MWC?
ISU takes a big pay cut, but its better than non-bcs at least.
Well what if the big east gets a sweet deal for tv revenue did they not say no to like 14 mill per school? So if it goes higher because of adding us and the other forgotten four then we are sitting pretty well still.
Stoops doesnt want a championship game because he doesnt want to risk losing that. How do you think he feels about playing an SEC schedule?
The race is on my friends I could see us heading to the big east if all else fails. Get the big east to twelve teams and have divisions and stay AQ status with a championship game. Or the big ten (and yes i am serious.)
Sure, the PAC isn't the SEC, but I don't think it's going to be an easy road for anyone with 14/16 team leagues. Touche, though.
- Status
