My attempt to rerail...some interesting info here.
Like they hadn't before? Oh, please! This move by A&M is stupid both from a competitive standpoint and a financial one. I hope enough of the SEC membership sees the stupidity of adding A&M and rejects Aggieland's application. The addition will only make the members' cut of the SEC TV revenue smaller. CBS/ESPN are not going to renegotiate the SEC's TV deals IMHO; there seems to be growing evidence supporting my position on this. If A&M is rejected, I'm expecting that experience will humble them, and they become at least tolerable Big12 members in the future. I don't see Aggie membership in the SEC as a done deal. When Loftin and Slive are at the podium together with a signed contract in hand, then I'll believe it's a done deal and no sooner.I bet every coach of every sport in the SEC is contacting kids in Texas right now.
So is that how an Aggie thinks?I'm implying that by knowing about something you therefore care more about it than you did before you knew it. I don't believe you can care as little about something as if you had never heard about it ever again unless you actually lose the memory of it. At the time you make the statement "I couldn't care less" you have to remember and know what you are talking about, otherwise you couldn't make that statement.
For example- let's say I put a leaf on your lawn this afternoon. Today, you go home from work and don't notice it. Your care about that leaf is at the absolute zero of care. You don't know about it and you've not devoted a single moment of your time to it. Tomorrow morning I post on CF that I left a leaf on your yard. You find out about it, but you really don't care very much at all. A leaf being on your yard doesn't have any meaning or impact on your life. You move on with your day and never give it a second thought. You still care (or did care at the moment I told you) more than you did before you knew it was there. You devoted at least a split second of thought to the leaf and therefore a least a split second of care to it. You are now (or were briefly) at 1 degree Kelvin of care. As soon as you forget about it, you're back to zero. Simply by taking the time and energy to acknowledge the issue, you now care more than you once did.
Math is Fun.
10 -1 + x = Big12
Find x.
Can those of you that can't let this go find another place to play "hide the sausage" with one another?
Depends on your definition of "care". At the very least, I would submit that "knowing about" something does not automatically generate care about said something.I'm implying that by knowing about something you therefore care more about it than you did before you knew it. I don't believe you can care as little about something as if you had never heard about it ever again unless you actually lose the memory of it. At the time you make the statement "I couldn't care less" you have to remember and know what you are talking about, otherwise you couldn't make that statement.
For example- let's say I put a leaf on your lawn this afternoon. Today, you go home from work and don't notice it. Your care about that leaf is at the absolute zero of care. You don't know about it and you've not devoted a single moment of your time to it. Tomorrow morning I post on CF that I left a leaf on your yard. You find out about it, but you really don't care very much at all. A leaf being on your yard doesn't have any meaning or impact on your life. You move on with your day and never give it a second thought. You still care (or did care at the moment I told you) more than you did before you knew it was there. You devoted at least a split second of thought to the leaf and therefore a least a split second of care to it. You are now (or were briefly) at 1 degree Kelvin of care. As soon as you forget about it, you're back to zero. Simply by taking the time and energy to acknowledge the issue, you now care more than you once did.
Could the caring/not caring topic be moved to its own new thread. It is really annoying and I don't want to put the posters on my ignore list because when they are on topic I value their thoughts...but, this is as bad as the Tammy message board right now.
Meanwhile, "at one time" infers this is something that's in the past - as in no longer takes place.
So again, it's reference/link to the current conference realignment decision by A&M is lost.
You're not thinking about the meaning behind the words. As I said, it's false. There was a time when you cared less than you do today and therefore to say that you couldn't care less is false. You could and did care less at one time in your life.
To say the phrase in a logically correct way you would have to qualify it by saying something like -- "I couldn't care less, unless I didn't care at all"
@CollegeStation Department Stores
Following the A&M announcement on leaving the Big12 Conference, there seems to be increased sales of mason jars. #perplexed
You are wrong. You can't logically measure something like someone's amount of care. how can you measure if someone care's less now or when they didn't know about it? Reductionism doesn't work because what people mean behind a statement like 'I couldn't care less' can not be conveyed in one short logical equation. People's knoweldge and experiences go into making a statment. Also,When people say that statement, they usually mean "Knowing that Texas A&M is leaving, I couldn't care less about it." What they don't mean is "I couldn't care less about Texas A&M leaving, including in the past when I didn't even know about them leaving and therefore didn't care about it at all."