*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

ajk4st8

Well-Known Member
Mar 27, 2006
16,483
737
113
42
Ankeny
Here is my prediction:

Rutgers/UConn go to ACC
WVU/A&M go to SEC
UT/TT/OU/OSU go to PAC

5 Big 12 teams remain and don't dissolve conference and negotiate exit fees equal to television money of other 5 (tier I and II)

4 remaining Big East schools (USF, Cinn, Louisville, TCU) join Big 12.

Big 12 adds
1. BYU - obvious choice although they may be a geographic outlier.
2. UCF - additional school in Florida to establish Florida recruiting. 40k+ fans is one of top 5 for non-AQ schools.
3. ECU - after BYU has most fans of any non-AQ school at 50k per game.

Divisions

WEST
BYU
TCU
Baylor
Kansas
Kansas State
Iowa State

EAST
Missouri
USF
UCF
ECU
Louisville
Cincinnati


While that sounds ok to me... Im sure Mizzou would be begging for SEC
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
After conferences go to 16 teams... doesn't the next step seem to be fore those super conferences to no longer play NCAA football and develop their own league?

No. A little thing called OTHER SPORTS especially men's basketball and the crapload of money they get from the NCAA tournament will keep this from happening.
 

getcloned

Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2008
257
12
18
I'm not a frequent poster; nor do I have the time to keep up with this huge thread.

I keep reading about how Pitt and Syracuse approached the ACC and how UCONN was "aggressively pursuing" ACC membership.

These scenarios of a conglomerate of leftovers from the Big East and Big 12 may be a temporary solution but I don't see them being solvent long term. I even doubt that we would compete in that league because we will have damaged our ability to recruit Texas. I think that the impact of this whole thing has probably already damaged our recruiting, maybe significantly.

We should be "aggressively pursuing" a Big 10 membership. This is where we NEED to be for everything to continue at its current trajectory. We should be relentless. Besides the big 12 staying together WITH the remaining 5 south teams, this is the only palatable outcome if we want to continue to grow the program. Joining with the likes of Louisville, Cinci, USF etc would, I fear, be the beginning of a long dark period for ISU football.

I love ISU and always will, but this is starting to affect my interest in college football as a whole.
 
Last edited:

LZclone

Active Member
Oct 2, 2008
491
28
28
54
Mahomet IL via Laurens IA
Desperate times call for Desperate measures....

or just well calculated ones. The 'forgotten five' are still apart of the Big XII, a TV contracted BCS AQ conference.

1. Apparently the going rate to defect from a conference is $20 million, pretty easy math 5 teams staying collect $20 million from the 5 leaving.

2. We can count and 12 is 12, so we add 7 teams.

Cincinnati - pretty sure they are looking now (TV markets)
Louisville - see above
Memphis - solid basketball (TV market)
TCU - solid FB and they don't have a home next year (TX recruiting & Dallas market)
Houston - solid FB (TX recruiting & TV market)
BYU - solid FB and a National Brand (TV market)
Air Force - solid FB and you cannot go wrong with a Service Academy

3. We create a Big XII network modeled after the B1G network. Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, St. Louis, Kansas City, Dallas, Houston, Salt Lake are Big BIG TV markets.

Dan Beebe, don't make me do your ******* job again.
 

justcynn

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,697
87
48
Cabot, AR
if we don't land in the big 10, Its about basketball now. Get the best basketball teams you can, use the money from any lawsuits and exit fees to invest, attract the best teams you can. sure we'll play football, but not it won't be the same - Louisville will always be relevant in Basketball, that is what we need to become.
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,854
30,346
113
Trenchtown
if we don't land in the big 10, Its about basketball now. Get the best basketball teams you can, use the money from any lawsuits and exit fees to invest, attract the best teams you can. sure we'll play football, but not it won't be the same - Louisville will always be relevant in Basketball, that is what we need to become.

The problem there is the donors go away. I am not donating this kind of money to watch bball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyatheart

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,922
12,722
113
but this is starting to affect my interest in college football as a whole.

I'm with you. If ISU is relegated to a 2nd class citizen my interest in college football will disappear. Thank God I'm old enough to have gotten my fill.
 

synapticwave

Active Member
Mar 9, 2007
964
193
43
Austin, TX
www.longshotgames.com
my theory (hope) is:

OU is working behind the scenes with A&M to make sure both schools stay the course in their plans to go to the PAC/SEC respectively. Texas then applies to the PAC and leaves the big12. BUT Then, OU and A&M say...well, with no Texas we really like the big12, let's add BYU to replace Texas and everyone in Big12 land stays happy.
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,435
6,943
113
49
I'm with you. If ISU is relegated to a 2nd class citizen my interest in college football will disappear. Thank God I'm old enough to have gotten my fill.

If we go to some Big East/Big 12 hybid with Cincinnati et al...I will still watch if it is on which it won't be very often because the Dbag conferences will take up all the slots. But I won't drive 7 hours to be there. Attendance will slide, donors will dry up, it's the end of football at ISU at this level.

Basketball will be fine but it doesnt require the big dollars football does.
 

ISUAgronomist

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2009
26,887
8,731
113
On the farm, IA
my theory (hope) is:

OU is working behind the scenes with A&M to make sure both schools stay the course in their plans to go to the PAC/SEC respectively. Texas then applies to the PAC and leaves the big12. BUT Then, OU and A&M say...well, with no Texas we really like the big12, let's add BYU to replace Texas and everyone in Big12 land stays happy.

You need to put this on Twitter w/ unnamed sources then it will be a valid option. I'll wait here.

TIA. :jimlad:
 

justcynn

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,697
87
48
Cabot, AR
my theory (hope) is:

OU is working behind the scenes with A&M to make sure both schools stay the course in their plans to go to the PAC/SEC respectively. Texas then applies to the PAC and leaves the big12. BUT Then, OU and A&M say...well, with no Texas we really like the big12, let's add BYU to replace Texas and everyone in Big12 land stays happy.
Wow, just wow...I like the positive thinking, but if anyone were to stay it would be texas over OU and A&M...
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,435
6,943
113
49
Desperate times call for Desperate measures....

or just well calculated ones. The 'forgotten five' are still apart of the Big XII, a TV contracted BCS AQ conference.

1. Apparently the going rate to defect from a conference is $20 million, pretty easy math 5 teams staying collect $20 million from the 5 leaving.

2. We can count and 12 is 12, so we add 7 teams.

Cincinnati - pretty sure they are looking now (TV markets)
Louisville - see above
Memphis - solid basketball (TV market)
TCU - solid FB and they don't have a home next year (TX recruiting & Dallas market)
Houston - solid FB (TX recruiting & TV market)
BYU - solid FB and a National Brand (TV market)
Air Force - solid FB and you cannot go wrong with a Service Academy

3. We create a Big XII network modeled after the B1G network. Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, St. Louis, Kansas City, Dallas, Houston, Salt Lake are Big BIG TV markets.

Dan Beebe, don't make me do your ******* job again.

A conf like this is a disaster for Iowa State, it will never be on TV, same as MWC now. We will get no money. We can't pay our coaches etc...This scenario is a disaster long term I think, reasonable people may disagree. Only hope is you get KU, MU, K State to stay somehow, keep the Big 10 from poaching and somehow get a networkd going.
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
If we go to some Big East/Big 12 hybid with Cincinnati et al...I will still watch if it is on which it won't be very often because the Dbag conferences will take up all the slots. But I won't drive 7 hours to be there. Attendance will slide, donors will dry up, it's the end of football at ISU at this level.

Basketball will be fine but it doesnt require the big dollars football does.

NBC/Comcast has been wanting to get into the game so they would have some slots. And from reports - Fox contract will stay or they could get sued for conflict of interest.

Order of games
1. NBC
2. FSN/FX
3. FSN
4. VS (NBC Sports)
5. Big XII Network
6. Big XII network
 

justcynn

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,697
87
48
Cabot, AR
This.

Point and Case SMU.
I have never heard of SMU basketball, all I know about them is they were cheaters in Football and received the Death Penalty for their ways...Iowa State basketball is our best chance to remain nationally relevant bar an unexpected invite from the big 10, that being the case - I believe we need to put all of our focus on becoming elite there, stay with KU, Louisville, maybe add a Memphis, etc. Not ideal, but the best of the least options that APPEAR to be available as a course of action going forward
 

vmbplayer

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 6, 2008
3,784
754
113
Ankeny
It hasn't affected SMU's endowment or their prestige. SMU, according to US News, is ranked higher than Minnesota, MSU, Iowa, Iowa State, etc...

ummm I guess when we were talking donors I was assuming we were talking about Athletic donors not University.

Plus the endowment of the University doesn't really get spent. So it wouldn't necessarily lower from when it was in a legit conference. I would be intereste in seeing what has happened to the rate of donation to SMU on the academic side since the break up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.