Anyone else nervous with the thought that bubu could be our starting point guard?
Anyone else nervous with the thought that bubu could be our starting point guard?
It would take a real miracle for Hoiberg to equal the past two seasons next year. If he does, and that doesn't get him accolades, then there is no justice in the world. I remember when Tim Floyd used JC players so effectively. It is certainly possible if these players will learn good defense.
I predict the non-conf season will be very confusing and probably disappointing while this team tries to figure out where everyone fits. Hopefully Fred and the staff can get it all straightened out by the time conference comes around. There are just so many moving parts next year!
Anyone else nervous with the thought that bubu could be our starting point guard?
Bubu may be our staring point guard for the first few games, but by the time conference comes around Monte will be the starter. Bubu will provide quality productive minutes off the bench along with leadership but nothing more. Add whatever Naz can provide off the bench and I am not worried at all about our guard situation next year.
I am not expressing one iota of doubt in my unwavering faith in that steadfast, and somewhat larger than life icon, which we trust so implicitly. I was merely stating that if he pulls this one off, kudos.Silly mitten, I trust Fred.
Ask Iowa how leaning on freshmen guards works, I agree though, Bubu will win the job early by default. If Fred ends up going with a small lineup, he'll start all year. If Fred goes big with Melvin at the 3, then he may not. The guard situation is the biggest concern, to just assume freshman and sophs who couldn't get any time this year can come and be depended on is wishful thinking. I'm not saying the young guys won't step up, its just silly to assume they're going to come right in and contribute. I hope you're right though, if they don't this place will get ugly next year. Next season will be Fred's biggest challenge to date, college bball is all about guards and with Fred's style they are even more crucial. No coach wants to go into a season with no proven guard who can score.
I am. He will need to improve even more than he did this off season. We need more scoring threats if we are going to start him imo.
I wish there was more information regarding Edozie. The only information that I've been able to find is on the Tyler cc website. The last five box scores on their website show him with the following points 4, 4, 0, 6, 0. They don't have rebounding stats in their box scores. Those are underwhelming scores for a division one player on a junior college team.
Hopefully the order by which they list players in their box scores is not correlated to their time on the floor. Daniel is always listed last.[/QUOTE
I hear ya. Take a look at the box scores on Cyclones.com. McGee is usually listed at the bottom of the page, so I don't think that means much.
I'm not expecting Edozie to come in and score a ton, but I do think he will bring a different dimension defensively. I saw recently he averaging close to 8 boards and 2-3 blocks per game. He's a "worker"...at least, that's what I'm thinking.
I wish there was more information regarding Edozie. The only information that I've been able to find is on the Tyler cc website. The last five box scores on their website show him with the following points 4, 4, 0, 6, 0. They don't have rebounding stats in their box scores. Those are underwhelming scores for a division one player on a junior college team.
Hopefully the order by which they list players in their box scores is not correlated to their time on the floor. Daniel is always listed last.[/QUOTE
I hear ya. Take a look at the box scores on Cyclones.com. McGee is usually listed at the bottom of the page, so I don't think that means much.
I'm not expecting Edozie to come in and score a ton, but I do think he will bring a different dimension defensively. I saw recently he averaging close to 8 boards and 2-3 blocks per game. He's a "worker"...at least, that's what I'm thinking.
Could he be a Godfrey type player eventually? That's kinda what I was hoping for. Not a scorer really at all, but more of an enforcer type rebounding guy that is a physical banger inside and does the dirty work.
I'm kinda worried though that we're bringing in a 3 year guy that goes scoreless quite a bit at the JUCO level. But, as I said, I wouldn't care if he averaged 1 pt a game for ISU as long as he averaged 8 rebs a game or more.
Could he be a Godfrey type player eventually? That's kinda what I was hoping for. Not a scorer really at all, but more of an enforcer type rebounding guy that is a physical banger inside and does the dirty work.
I'm kinda worried though that we're bringing in a 3 year guy that goes scoreless quite a bit at the JUCO level. But, as I said, I wouldn't care if he averaged 1 pt a game for ISU as long as he averaged 8 rebs a game or more.
I think so, yes...similar, at least. Think of McGee's intensity (not scoring), but in a lot bigger body.
Edozie only has two years.Could he be a Godfrey type player eventually? That's kinda what I was hoping for. Not a scorer really at all, but more of an enforcer type rebounding guy that is a physical banger inside and does the dirty work.
I'm kinda worried though that we're bringing in a 3 year guy that goes scoreless quite a bit at the JUCO level. But, as I said, I wouldn't care if he averaged 1 pt a game for ISU as long as he averaged 8 rebs a game or more.
Morris/Long/Bubu
SDW/Bluford
Thomas/Hogue/Okoro
Ejim/Edozie
Niang/Gibson/Amardi
Morris/Long/Bubu
Thomas/SDW/Bluford
Ejim/Hogue/Okoro
Niang/Edozie
Gibson/Amardie
You could almost consider Georges more of a 3 than Ejim. At least, I think he handles the ball and passes better.