Kids playing football

00clone

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2011
19,661
604
113
Iowa City area
I'd like to think I'll sit down with my son and lay everything out on the table regarding risks and concerns. And if he is still determined to play, then I won't be the one to stand in his way. His mother, on the other hand...

That was exactly my approach.


Something to consider, guys, while I like that theoretical concept....human beings in general are horrible at judging situations involving something definitely good now possibly causing something bad later. Children are even worse at it. They just can't grasp the concept of deferred outcomes. Not to say I'm opposed to kids playing football, but if your reasoning is that they made an informed choice...they really likely didn't, since they can't accurately judge that risk. Children regularly are tested in a "Have a piece of candy now, or 3 later" situations, and they take the 1 now.
 

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,591
13,590
113
IA
It's something I don't have to consider for several years. I know my wife feels differently, but when it does come time to make that decision, I'd like to think I'll sit down with my son and lay everything out on the table regarding risks and concerns. And if he is still determined to play, then I won't be the one to stand in his way. His mother, on the other hand...

I was wondering if you'd be posting in here.

The brain stops developing at 25. There is no way I feel comfortable not just opening up the possibility of brain bruising and injury during a period of development, but essentially encouraging it. I've had a family member with severe brain injury, and it is life-altering and devastating. I don't want that for my son when the odds of him being good enough to get any appreciable benefit from it (in the way of a scholarship or career) are astronomically small. He's in the 3rd percentile for height right now, so I'm pretty sure he'd get his butt knocked all over the field. I'm not setting him up to get his butt kicked.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
42,737
33,751
113
Something to consider, guys, while I like that theoretical concept....human beings in general are horrible at judging situations involving something definitely good now possibly causing something bad later. Children are even worse at it. They just can't grasp the concept of deferred outcomes. Not to say I'm opposed to kids playing football, but if your reasoning is that they made an informed choice...they really likely didn't, since they can't accurately judge that risk. Children regularly are tested in a "Have a piece of candy now, or 3 later" situations, and they take the 1 now.

That's totally valid, and I know that when I was 14, I certainly wasn't thinking long term. However, I do know that the type of parent that I try to be, doesn't allow for a lot of "forbidding" things, not that we don't have rules, but I really dislike the "because I said so" line of logic. It will also depend on how my kid grows up. If my child has a passion for football, I'm not going to stand in the way of it.

Also, why be the bad guy, when I don't have to be?

|
|
|
|
V

I was wondering if you'd be posting in here.

The brain stops developing at 25. There is no way I feel comfortable not just opening up the possibility of brain bruising and injury during a period of development, but essentially encouraging it. I've had a family member with severe brain injury, and it is life-altering and devastating. I don't want that for my son when the odds of him being good enough to get any appreciable benefit from it (in the way of a scholarship or career) are astronomically small. He's in the 3rd percentile for height right now, so I'm pretty sure he'd get his butt knocked all over the field. I'm not setting him up to get his butt kicked.
 

Angie

Tugboats and arson.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
28,591
13,590
113
IA
So they parents that won't let their kids play football also plan to keep their kids from driving as well right? Just like everything in our society, people overreact and treat the exception as the rule when it comes to anything controversial. I'd guess most ppl who keep their kids from contact sports didn't play them themselves and don't really know the risks. They only know the negative stories. Heck this is only a few posts long and there are things said that just totally aren't true.

Do 1 in 5 kids who drive sustain a concussion? Of those, do 33% report at least one more driving-related concussion within a year?

High-school football accounts for 47% of all sports-related concussions. To say that football isn't a huge problem is just false.
 

jkclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jan 21, 2013
5,834
2,360
83
Urbandale
Something to consider, guys, while I like that theoretical concept....human beings in general are horrible at judging situations involving something definitely good now possibly causing something bad later. Children are even worse at it. They just can't grasp the concept of deferred outcomes. Not to say I'm opposed to kids playing football, but if your reasoning is that they made an informed choice...they really likely didn't, since they can't accurately judge that risk. Children regularly are tested in a "Have a piece of candy now, or 3 later" situations, and they take the 1 now.
I'm sure there are studies to support this but I don't really agree with it. If you give me the option of 1 now or 3 in 5 minutes yeah it makes sense to take the three, but if it is 1 now or 3 in a week I'm taking the 1 now. I don't really know that we can effectively measure these things because their different for everyone.
 

besserheimerphat

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
11,477
15,321
113
Mount Vernon, WA
The problem is not concussions. It's multiple sub-concussive hits over the course of the season - playing on the line, doing Oklahoma drills, head hitting the ground, etc - that puts a person at greater risk. Muhammad Ali was never knocked out, but he took a lot of blows to the head. Younger kids are at greater risk because even though they are slower and lighter, their neck muscles aren't as developed and their heads are a larger percentage of their body weight. That leads to larger accelerations and harder brain/skull impacts. It's one thing to have a bad shoulder or knee or whatever because you can figure out how to work around it. But when you start losing cognitive ability there is really no way to adapt to that.

I played tackle football from 7th - 12th grade as a center. I do wonder if I'll have issues as I get older. And if I do, will it be because I played football? I've got all daughters so I don't have to worry about them playing football, but I do wonder about them playing soccer because it's been shown that heading the ball for years on end can have effects.
 

Gossamer

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2014
1,621
1,564
113
My favorite argument is the one based on machismo. "Let your boy play or he's a *****!"

I played. I got hurt. If you play, so could you. It's not about being tough because there is always someone tougher.

Parents make decisions based on perspective. Nobody is wrong in what they decide. But facts have been established and football has a greater inherent risk of head injury than other sports.

With that being said, I'm signing my kids up for ax throwing class. Few injuries that I've read about.
 

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,368
13,516
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
I think for as little as we know about what head injuries do to developed brains we know much less about what they do to brains that are still developing. I find it hard to believe that someone would get some kind of special experience from playing football that they wouldn't get from playing baseball, soccer, basketball etc. I personally don't see there being some innate benefit that football would have over another team sport with less risks involved.

I enjoyed all the sports you mentioned. Football was easily my favorite, though. And I never received all-conference honors or anything.

Football is a violent sport for sure. As hard as it must be for you to understand, the violence is what draws some of us to it. That and the unparalleled camaraderie required for eleven teammates to be successful.

During my school days, the kids that couldn't hack it on the field figured it out rather easily on their own. They didn't need their parents to decide for them. Not everybody's wired for it. Completely understandable.
 

Tailg8er

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2011
7,875
4,734
113
38
Johnston
All you people that say 'I only have daughters so I don't have to worry about it' crack me up! Are they too girly to play or something?? Wasn't women's equality day just yesterday???




:jimlad:
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
42,737
33,751
113
All you people that say 'I only have daughters so I don't have to worry about it' crack me up! Are they too girly to play or something?? Wasn't women's equality day just yesterday???


:jimlad:

No, if my daughter wanted to play football, I'd have the same discussion with her. The difference is, when I say I don't have to worry about my daughter playing football, it's not because I think women can't play. It's because I know my daughter, having raised her to this point, and feel very comfortable in saying that football is probably not going to be her thing. I know her interests, and football is pretty far from them. Could that change? Sure. But, it would take a pretty seismic shift in her personality. Soccer? For sure. Ballet? Yep. Gymnastics? Definitely. Football? unlikely, but you never know.
 

00clone

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2011
19,661
604
113
Iowa City area
That's totally valid, and I know that when I was 14, I certainly wasn't thinking long term. However, I do know that the type of parent that I try to be, doesn't allow for a lot of "forbidding" things, not that we don't have rules, but I really dislike the "because I said so" line of logic. It will also depend on how my kid grows up. If my child has a passion for football, I'm not going to stand in the way of it.

Also, why be the bad guy, when I don't have to be?

|
|
|
|
V


Agreed, however, I feel strongly that the job of the parent is to be the bowling ball bumpers of a child's life path, within their ability to maneuver on their own. Young children need pretty close bumpers, and you give them more freedom as they grow. I think you'll probably make a good choice, but I know some parents who take the child's decision making ability way too far. They act like they're talking to little adults, and their cognitive and reasoning abilities just aren't there yet, no matter how smart they think their precious little snowflakes are.
 

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,526
44,483
113
46
Newton
All you people that say 'I only have daughters so I don't have to worry about it' crack me up! Are they too girly to play or something?? Wasn't women's equality day just yesterday???




:jimlad:

My stepdaughter did competitive cheerleading and I witnessed many nasty injuries from falls at competitions.
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
I will support my kids in any endeavor they choose. I want them to experience life, which has all sorts of inherit risk, and injury in football is one of those risks.
 

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
63,239
61,903
113
Ames
I will support my kids in any endeavor they choose. I want them to experience life, which has all sorts of inherit risk, and injury in football is one of those risks.
Inherent, and I don't think that getting injured playing football is one of the inherent risks of life since you could just not do that.
 

cy4life94

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 26, 2012
603
292
63
Cedar Rapids
I say if you are going to get a concussion doing it while you are young and still developing is the way to go. Kind of like breaking a bone, it will heal faster when you are young.:jimlad:

Seriously though, I had more concussions playing baseball than I did playing football while growing up.
 

ISUalum2012

Active Member
Mar 24, 2014
154
50
28
I don't have kids yet, but I would not have a problem with them playing football. The thing I don't agree with is youth tackle football. I don't get any argument for it especially when you stack those arguments against the data and studies against it. You shouldn't play youth football for mostly the same reasons you shouldn't drink or smoke weed as a youth; your brain is still developing and is more vulnerable to damage.

Further, I don't buy the argument that you need to start young in order to develop proper tackling technique. That's bogus, you can learn to tackle properly at any level.

Play flag football from 3rd through 6th grade (maybe even 7th based on brain development data) to learn the ropes so to say, then play tackle after that.
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
Inherent, and I don't think that getting injured playing football is one of the inherent risks of life since you could just not do that.

You really can't do anything in life without risk. Inherent may have been the wrong term, but every time that kid jumps in a car, rides a bike, canoes down a river, goes for a hike, etc they will encounter risk.
 

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,526
44,483
113
46
Newton
Inherent, and I don't think that getting injured playing football is one of the inherent risks of life since you could just not do that.

I hit my head on the ceiling and got a concussion when walking down my stairs into the basement, maybe I shouldn't go into my basement anymore.