These officials

xboxfever

Well-Known Member
Nov 4, 2008
13,244
6,890
113
Thanks to Scott Van Pelt I just realized that if Tom Eades did have money on this game, Deonte Burton ****ed him with that buzzer beater at the end. **** Tom Eades.
 

jkclone

Well-Known Member
Bookie
Jan 21, 2013
5,834
2,360
83
Urbandale
I don't remember where it was, but I will say this. I have criticized Prohm for not standing up to the officials. I was very pleased with how he acted tonight.
 

kentkel

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
5,408
5,630
113
57
ISU definitely needed to shore up some terrible TOs tonight to have a chance. BUT, you can't tell me that Eades' bogus call that sent Niang to the bench in the first half didn't have a HUGE impact on the end result. Without our best player on the floor allowed OU to get a 6pt lead at the half. Imagine if Buddy would have picked up a 2nd foul as early as Georges did. OU would have struggled mightily! Also, that horrid charging call against Nadar (on the dunk) took it from a possible 6pt deficit to a 11pt deficit due to the ensuing weak-*** technical on Prohm. Bob Huggins does more screaming and flailing over a call made against his team when they are up 10 than Steve Prohm has done in his entire career. Proud of our guys battling tonight when we often were playing against 6 opponents.
 

dafarmer

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2012
7,243
6,913
113
SW Iowa
Eades is by far the worst Big 12 official. A good official doesn't constantly make so many out of position calls, or anticipate fouls that don't happen. He doesn't want Heilds kids, But his grandkids would like a pony ride.
 

Goothrey

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2009
4,882
636
113
Dayton via Austin
Nader got the sour end of it tonight. That travel call towards the end of the 1st half (announcers were kind enough to point out that it wasn't a travel) took 2 points off the board. Then that charge call, where Buddy slides in under Nader who was already in the air. That single play was an 8 point swing. Instead of the and one, a T is called and OU gets 5 points on the other end. That was the single biggest call of the game.
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,806
3,698
113
Menlo, Iowa
If its a foul on one end, its a foul on the other end. If it is a travel on one end it is a travel on the other end.

Hield is allowed to push off and create space on a lot of plays, that is fine but you have to allow the other team the same leeway. Just because he is an AA doesn't mean he doesn't foul when playing D.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,825
66,272
113
LA LA Land
ISU definitely needed to shore up some terrible TOs tonight to have a chance. BUT, you can't tell me that Eades' bogus call that sent Niang to the bench in the first half didn't have a HUGE impact on the end result. Without our best player on the floor allowed OU to get a 6pt lead at the half. Imagine if Buddy would have picked up a 2nd foul as early as Georges did. OU would have struggled mightily! Also, that horrid charging call against Nadar (on the dunk) took it from a possible 6pt deficit to a 11pt deficit due to the ensuing weak-*** technical on Prohm. Bob Huggins does more screaming and flailing over a call made against his team when they are up 10 than Steve Prohm has done in his entire career. Proud of our guys battling tonight when we often were playing against 6 opponents.

If Prohm's T was a T, Huggins and Self should get 20-50 T's a game.
 

BBHMagic

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2009
4,370
1,379
113
The thing that I just can't get over is our best player fouled out and I'm not sure that he even had one foul.