Hoiberg to Huskers
- Thread starter CaliforniaCy
- Start date
As much as it would give me pleasure to see that, I highly doubt the NCAA will "cripple" the KU program. Self, et al. can claim they had no knowledge of the money deal. Unless, of course, other issues become public knowledge.
Political fanboys (and their reverse haters, of course) have gotten so bad nowadays that, in order to emphasize how much one is a fanboy of player/coach/team X, we compare them to some political fanboys/homers, not the other way around like it originally was.
Being a homer for ISU or Fred Hoiberg is just clean fun, though. Jamie Pollard, Steve Prohm, Georges Niang, and Fred Hoiberg do not have any nuclear codes. We might not like them, but I think we are smart enough to recognize a KU or Nebraska homer is fundamentally similar to us, just having fun, and none of the debates really mean anything.
Frankly, people being as discerning and level-headed between different figures and factions about about politics as they were about sports would be a huge step up.
Last edited:
Political fanboys (and their reverse haters, of course) have gotten so bad nowadays that, in order to emphasize how much one is a fanboy of player/coach/team X, we compare them to some political fanboys/homers, not the other way around like it originally was.
Being a homer for ISU or Fred Hoiberg is just clean fun, though. Jamie Pollard, Steve Prohm, Georges Niang, and Fred Hoiberg do not have any nuclear codes. We might not like them, but I think we are smart enough to recognize a KU or Nebraska homer is fundamentally similar to us, just having fun, and none of the debates really mean anything.
Frankly, people being as discerning and level-headed between different figures and factions about about politics as they were about politics would be a huge step up.
I miss all your charts in the Cave, BB.
Political fanboys (and their reverse haters, of course) have gotten so bad nowadays that, in order to emphasize how much one is a fanboy of player/coach/team X, we compare them to some political fanboys/homers, not the other way around like it originally was.
Being a homer for ISU or Fred Hoiberg is just clean fun, though. Jamie Pollard, Steve Prohm, Georges Niang, and Fred Hoiberg do not have any nuclear codes. We might not like them, but I think we are smart enough to recognize a KU or Nebraska homer is fundamentally similar to us, just having fun, and none of the debates really mean anything.
Frankly, people being as discerning and level-headed between different figures and factions about about politics as they were about politics would be a huge step up.
Come back to the cave. I’ll make omelettes
In Chicago, there's no way that somebody doesn't yell, "Hoiberg, you suck!".
Those charts and long posts are a million times better than what we get now. You don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone.
Few too many omelettes in there right now as it is.
How would you describe "what we get now?"
Trump tweets, but if Trump tweets could actually post content on message boards.
holy crap; there's a lot of posters with actual serious opinions on this. And we're up to 9 -pages!!
Please feel free to bump my reply and verbally humiliate me if this 'Fred-to-Nebby' rumor comes to pass, because right now I think it's stoopid.
Please feel free to bump my reply and verbally humiliate me if this 'Fred-to-Nebby' rumor comes to pass, because right now I think it's stoopid.
With this post, I can see that I've taught you well.Yes, although there isn't that much to see.
