Nine Sooners test positive after being away from the football team

3rdCoastClone

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 15, 2017
189
109
43
65
Gulf Coast of Texas
It is being reported that after given a one week hiatus away from football, nine Oklahoma players just came back to the team and tested positive for covid. Fortunately, now that they've returned to the controlled structure of football, the players will be given the proper medical care and testing.

They aren’t any safer from the virus if they don’t play.

 
Last edited:

3GenClone

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2009
6,432
4,077
113
Columbus, OH
Clemson had 37 players test positive over the course of a few weeks back in late June, and the ACC is still pressing forward with football. I think you are bound to see spikes everywhere this week. ISU had 2% of students (at least the ones that wiill be living on campus) test positive at move in over the past two weeks.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
giphy.gif
 

CyCloned

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
13,602
6,968
113
Robins, Iowa
It is being reported that after being given a one week hiatus away from football, nine Oklahoma players just came back to the team and tested positive for covid. Fortunately, now that they've returned to the structure of football, the players will be given the proper medical care and testing.

They aren’t any safer from the virus if they don’t play.

This is exactly what I have said all along. When they are with the team, working out, etc you can somewhat control their exposure. With changes to equipment you can change their exposure. It is when they get in the general public that they will have the best chance to be exposed.

Beyond all this, young healthy men with good access to medical care are way better off with or without Covid than the general public. Again, not having football is not a guarantee that players or coaches will avoid getting the virus, it is probably more likely they get it from other exposure outside the controlled environment without football.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,659
63,724
113
Not exactly sure.
Clemson had 37 players test positive over the course of a few weeks back in late June, and the ACC is still pressing forward with football. I think you are bound to see spikes everywhere this week. ISU had 2% of students (at least the ones that wiill be living on campus) test positive at move in over the past two weeks.

I hadn’t seen the second weeks number. I saw 66 the first week, what were second weeks.
 

3GenClone

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2009
6,432
4,077
113
Columbus, OH
  • Informative
Reactions: BCClone

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,221
13,064
113
Des Moines
I dont think this proves your thesis, I think it just proves players likely wont comply with rules anywhere.


Not sure which you disagree with.

A) players are as likely to be infected in the general public and having protocols and frequent testing may actually protect them.

B) HS players that won't have near the protocol should be nowhere near the field this fall.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,284
55,188
113
I dont think this proves your thesis, I think it just proves players likely wont comply with rules anywhere.

Just wait until the social circle expands beyond the football team in about 2 weeks.

The focus on football only will be quite a challenge.

We'll see.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: diaclone

Beyerball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
7,473
6,814
113
Texas
Every HC of teams playing needs to relay msg of “ for next 3 months you need to live in bubble with your teammates... if you don’t and u test positive you won’t play rest of year”...

if HCs put smack down on then cfball could happen... Wishful thinking with 18-22 yr olds.

new saliva testing I’m gonna assume nearly every campus will implement ASAP and this should help exponentially
 

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,562
23,981
113
Iowa State's football season won't be stopped because too many players test positive. It will be stopped because the University will be forced to go all online since way too many of the 30,000+ other students are totally ignoring the University's pleas to act responsibly.

Classes haven't even started yet and already I can't believe what I'm seeing on and around campus. The only question is how far into the fall semester will we get before everyone has to go home.
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
19,976
19,637
113
It was 70-something - KCCI had it yesterday. I'm looking for it now.

Found it: 75 out of 3,472 tested between Aug 7 and Aug 13

2.2% the first week.
2.2% the second week.

The consistency is remarkable, but I suppose there's something to be said for over 6,500 data points (to date).
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
Iowa State's football season won't be stopped because too many players test positive. It will be stopped because the University will be forced to go all online since way too many of the 30,000+ other students are totally ignoring the University's pleas to act responsibly.

Classes haven't even started yet and already I can't believe what I'm seeing on and around campus. The only question is how far into the fall semester will we get before everyone has to go home.

Seems like universities pretty much expect that. They just want to make it past the last date when partial tuition refunds are still possible.