Campbell turned down $68.5m NFL contract this off season

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
Detroit is a wasteland for a job. The money is good, but no control over players. The college level allows for better job security and control of operations.
Campbell would have control over the players no matter where he went IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: I@ST1

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,909
8,398
113
Overland Park
Campbell would have control over the players no matter where he went IMO

Has any college coach ever had personnel control their first year in the NFL? I don’t think even many NFL coaches have that say. That’s typically the GM’s job.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,328
39,362
113
Honestly, I doubt there are more than a handful of jobs in the last 3 years, NFL or college, where he wasn't at or near the top of the wish list. I'd bet a lot of money he could have had Texas. We all know that the lessor SEC teams would have killed for him. Hell Tennessee has wanted him twice.

Next year is the year that I think we will know if he really wants to commit to 10-15 years at Iowa State. We lose what seems like a lot and we all know how much he loves Brock. Next year would be the natural year to move on.

We should all become huge Jim Harbaugh fans ;)
 

I@ST1

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2020
1,727
593
113
Has any college coach ever had personnel control their first year in the NFL? I don’t think even many NFL coaches have that say. That’s typically the GM’s job.

Didn’t see too many issues with Kliff Kingsbury this past year....
 

zcecsch

Active Member
Feb 6, 2021
118
161
43
I think it is pretty obvious that Matt Campbell is not particularly motivated by money. You can see that in how he had his raises go towards his assistants instead of himself, how he doesn't have an agent, etc etc. If he was eager to accept a job that paid more, he would have left ages ago. Florida State, or any of the NFL jobs would have paid more.

I do think that it is likely that Campbell will leave eventually, but it won't just be because he is paid more. It will be that he wants a different challenge, or ISU reaches their ceiling, or something along those lines I think.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: usedcarguy

usedcarguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2008
5,556
1,581
113
Ames
You can do a lot with an extra $28 million. That’s starting to build multiple layers of generational wealth.
Yep. We're talking about not just your kids never having to worry about money but now your grandkids

Yep. But there is also a compelling counterargument for many that leaving kids and grandkids that kind of money isn't a good thing.

It's one thing to leave a legacy that pays for their education, a downpayment on a house, and gets them a jump on life, but many would donate the money to charity before creating a situation where a couple of subsequent generations would never have to work. That money would certainly buy them comfort, but also quite possibly ruin their lives because they'd never have to strive for anything.

Assuming he stays healthy and and is good with his money...which by all accounts seems to be the case, he will make more than enough so that those generations won't have to work anyway.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
Has any college coach ever had personnel control their first year in the NFL? I don’t think even many NFL coaches have that say. That’s typically the GM’s job.
Dodd said Campbell was given full control and turned it down
 

usedcarguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2008
5,556
1,581
113
Ames
I think it is pretty obvious that Matt Campbell is not particularly motivated by money. You can see that in how he had his raises go towards his assistants instead of himself, how he doesn't have an agent, etc etc. If he was eager to accept a job that paid more, he would have left ages ago. Florida State, or any of the NFL jobs would have paid more.

I do think that it is likely that Campbell will leave eventually, but it won't just be because he is paid more. It will be that he wants a different challenge, or ISU reaches their ceiling, or something along those lines I think.

I agree. You can just see how he's wired. How many people walk away from a D1 scholarship to play D3? You have to be wired a bit differently to do that. A lot of people chase money or fame because of ego. If he has one, there is no one else better in the world at hiding it. I think he stays in Ames for as long as he feels challenged and is given the tools to be successful....or feels that he has become "the best version of himself." Hopefully that day when he leaves ends up many, many years from now.
 

Yaz

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 29, 2018
1,620
2,584
113
I agree. You can just see how he's wired. How many people walk away from a D1 scholarship to play D3? You have to be wired a bit differently to do that. A lot of people chase money or fame because of ego. If he has one, there is no one else better in the world at hiding it. I think he stays in Ames for as long as he feels challenged and is given the tools to be successful....or feels that he has become "the best version of himself." Hopefully that day when he leaves ends up many, many years from now.
And when he leaves, he leaves it to someone that he has mentored and has a similar outlook/philosophy. That would be the best case scenario.
 

I@ST1

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2020
1,727
593
113
Yep. But there is also a compelling counterargument for many that leaving kids and grandkids that kind of money isn't a good thing.

It's one thing to leave a legacy that pays for their education, a downpayment on a house, and gets them a jump on life, but many would donate the money to charity before creating a situation where a couple of subsequent generations would never have to work. That money would certainly buy them comfort, but also quite possibly ruin their lives because they'd never have to strive for anything.

Assuming he stays healthy and and is good with his money...which by all accounts seems to be the case, he will make more than enough so that those generations won't have to work anyway.

Umm... that’s not how it works. If you actually believe that.. I’m sorry and good for you... But the term “many” is used a little loose here. (IMO).
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: cynile

JP4CY

Lord, beer me strength.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
74,556
95,542
113
Testifying
Has any college coach ever had personnel control their first year in the NFL? I don’t think even many NFL coaches have that say. That’s typically the GM’s job.
Don't know but guys that come to mind are Chip Kelly and Saban.
We all know about the Jimmy Johnson - JJ feud.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,909
8,398
113
Overland Park
Didn’t see too many issues with Kliff Kingsbury this past year....

Dang I didn’t realize they gave him GM responsibilities too. I know Bill does that with the Patriots, but even Reid doesn’t have that with the Chiefs.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,909
8,398
113
Overland Park
Don't know but guys that come to mind are Chip Kelly and Saban.
We all know about the Jimmy Johnson - JJ feud.

Saban didn’t have player control. He wanted to sign Brees and they went with Culpepper. He wanted to draft a WR(can’t remember if it was Fitzgerald or Megatron), and they went with whatever bust they went with.