Report: OU & Texas reach out to join SEC

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,909
74,635
113
America
.It would be the end of Matt Campbell as well at Iowa State. We couldn’t afford to pay him.
200.gif
 

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,452
4,716
113
Altoona
Memphis, Houston, Colorado state(Denver area ish), Northern Illinois(Chicago area ish), Cincinnati we have options if they bolt. All pretty big markets. It won’t happen and the big 12 will be all but dead. But it’s something that doesn’t get mentions especially CSU and niu.

here's the thing though, the new playoff rules also help whoever is in the Big 12 no matter who is in it. All they have to do is be one of the five best conference champions. Obviously it could hurt the #2 or #3 teams in the league, but I think the Big 12 will add enough even if the worst happens that they'll still be at worst the fifth best conference.
 

WooBadger18

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2012
15,146
13,550
113
On Wisconsin
I won't say I'm not worried, but I'm going to try to not going to stress about this.

Iowa State is an AAU school. It has a passionate fanbase. It has the third largest stadium in the Big 12. It's got good facilities, a good football program and a rising basketball program (with recent success). Plus, with cord cutting it may be more beneficial to have a passionate fanbase than a large market. If Texas and Oklahoma leave, I don't think Iowa State will be on the outside looking in.
 

Hoggins

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 2, 2019
3,398
4,861
113
37
Yeah like I said in my other post if that happens the Big 12 is a dying conference. You were the one saying let them leave as if it wasn’t a big deal.

It’s a big deal, but I also don’t care. ISU will keep playing football either way.

And nothing matters anyway. We’re all on a rock flying 70,000 mph through space. Nothing matters.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,174
1,611
113
Our conference commish best be doing something besides crawling on his knees.
 

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,575
24,041
113
I'm too tired to have a mental melt-down over this topic again. I've spent all my energy worrying this past year about the impact of a global pandemic and the impending collapse of our nation's democracy. I'm definitely a fanatic for Cyclone sports, but when you come right down to it, collegiate athletics is just entertainment. All that said, I have a feeling that when the dust settles, once again ISU will end up just fine.
 

usedcarguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2008
5,556
1,581
113
Ames
Trust me. Being in the SEC is more prestigious than being in the Big 12. Ask every A.D. who has left. A&M and Missouri are better off as an athletic department going 7-5 in the SEC than goin 10-3 in the Big 12. If being scared of competition was good for your brand nobody would have ever left. $$$$$ builds facilities. Mizzou is better off financially than they ever have been.

We are financially better off than ever as well, and we didn't go anywhere.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,540
74,331
113
Ankeny
My first big worry about this is the immediate effect on recruiting.

10 years ago, right as Rhoads shouldve been capitalizing on momentum from early wins, realignment hit and he couldnt promise recruits we'd even be in a P5 conference by the time they got there. Now, we're considerably farther along, but this has to have an effect.

Regarding the original article, to me it seems a question how serious any discussions have gotten. Texas and OU are really the only programs that would have a reason to look at leaving and demand from other conferences. It makes sense that they'd do their due diligence in kicking the tires on their options before re-signing their next deal. It still seems like it'd be a dumb move in the end though.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,343
39,383
113
My first big worry about this is the immediate effect on recruiting.

10 years ago, right as Rhoads shouldve been capitalizing on momentum from early wins, realignment hit and he couldnt promise recruits we'd even be in a P5 conference by the time they got there. Now, we're considerably farther along, but this has to have an effect.

Regarding the original article, to me it seems a question how serious any discussions have gotten. Texas and OU are really the only programs that would have a reason to look at leaving and demand from other conferences. It makes sense that they'd do their due diligence in kicking the tires on their options before re-signing their next deal. It still seems like it'd be a dumb move in the end though.

Campbell and staff are clearly better than Rhoads at recruiting, but you are right that the uncertainty REALLY hurt Rhoads. One way that it could possibly hurt Campbell's recruiting is if our best option was some ******** Pac-12 conference hybrid. We recruit Ohio and Illinois and Missouri a lot now. Would it be harder to get kids to come here from those states if we were playing Colorado, Arizona, and BYU? Maybe.
 

clonehome

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2006
1,634
3,056
113
Why did they add Rutgers and Maryland then? What do they bring to the conference other than big TV markets? If it was about better rivalries and balance wouldn't Pitt and Syracuse been better schools?
Rutgers and Maryland had 2 jobs when they joined the B1G. 1) jam the monthly BTN fee down each local cable subscriber’s throat even though most didn’t want it, 2) lose to Ohio St, Michigan and Penn State in football which allowed the East-West divisions. The Scarlet Knights and Terps have succeeded.