Pac 16 with us, KSU, OSU, and Colorado in a pod. Arizona, ASU, Utah, and TT in another pod.
This guy made up **** left and right the last couple rounds of realignment. Complete waste of time to read his takes.
And there's no way if they have a wish list it includes KSU but not KU.
Yes- if we don’t want to play football anymore.Is the big east not an option?
No way. KU and K State are surely a package deal. The addition of both of them gives the Big Ten 16 teams.If KU lands in the Big 10, we’ll be with them.
No way. KU and K State are surely a package deal. The addition of both of them gives the Big Ten 16 teams.
Would love that but what good does it do for the Big 10 to move fast? Only reason maybe to move fast for the Big 10 is to invite OU and Texas.Iowa State should move now to join the Big 10. We should not wait for OU or Texas to leave. We need to be aggressive to ensure we are not left out of the 4 power conferences. The Big 12 is done.
No way. KU and K State are surely a package deal. The addition of both of them gives the Big Ten 16 teams.
No way. KU and K State are surely a package deal. The addition of both of them gives the Big Ten 16 teams.
Tech over Kansas seems odd, unless they know something.Wtf is #Beardown? Isn’t that Baylor?
Would love that but what good does it do for the Big 10 to move fast? Only reason maybe to move fast for the Big 10 is to invite OU and Texas.
The fact that I am seeing OU and Texas fans gleeful at the possibility is just sad. And pisses me off.What bothers me the most about all of this is the glaring lack of denial from OU or UT.
Nebraska?
very true...had a convo with my brother over the phone after work and tv is very much changing with streaming services becoming more of the norm. I'm pretty active on CFB Reddit and there's tons of people who have dropped the traditional cable providers for streaming servicesI also think people need to stop using TV eyeballs/geographic footprint/tv markets as such a huge thing. 10-15 years ago, yes. But cable subscribers have fallen by like 20M...it's just not as big of a deal for a conference like the Big Ten as it used to be. We aren't in 2010 anymore.
Ordinarily I would agree. But if it comes down to keeping up with the Joneses (SEC) who knows?If you think the Big Ten will let another non-AAU member in, you're more loony than we all thought.
If you think the Big Ten will let another non-AAU member in, you're more loony than we all thought.
they might not be the packaged deal you think they are...The B1G loves AAU members...KU is and K-State is not...and do you think KU would say "oh no, poor K-State has the possibility of getting relegated to a non P5, while KU goes to the B1G"? Absolutely not...they would not look backNo way. KU and K State are surely a package deal. The addition of both of them gives the Big Ten 16 teams.