Latest Bracketology

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,187
25,037
113
Minneapolis
Two potential NCAA tournament 6 seeds (Ohio State and USC) lost Monday night. If ISU beats OSU and either Baylor or TT in the Big 12 tournament, I think they secure a 6 seed at the Dance.
Michigan State is a 6/7 seed too and they got curbstomped Tuesday night at Michigan. LSU also a 6 seed on many brackets plays at Arkansas tonight. Go Hogs.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,950
41,664
113
Waukee
Torvik projection right now...

First #7 seed behind Iowa and ahead of Murray State

Assume W against OSU and L against Baylor --

First #7 seed behind Iowa and ahead of Murray State (this is what the model expects to happen)

Assume W against OSU and Baylor --

Final #6 behind St. Mary's and ahead of Iowa

Assume L against OSU and Baylor --

Last #8 behind Boise State and ahead of San Diego State (91.4% chance to make tournament)

(seems like they need one more win to absolutely 100% lock in a berth)

I could add games in KC if anybody wants to see some specific scenario, but there are probably too many of them to keep doing this. But they're on track for a #7 hopefully with a win tonight.
 

CyPunch

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2019
4,707
11,988
113
Sandy Springs, GA
Not sure we can crawl up much higher than a 6.

I was playing around with Torvik and going 2-2 in our next 4 games, meaning we beat Texas in first round down in KC would put us as a 6 according to his rankings. Now, other teams would play into that but I don't see us getting past a 6. Maybe if we win out we'd get a 5 but thats probably doubtful.

If we did something crazy we could bump up all the way up to a 5. By crazy, I mean something like...

OSU (W)
@Baylor (W)
Tech (W)
Baylor (W)
Kansas (L)

It's nice we're playing well but this is obviously extremely unlikely. Tonight alone will be a battle.
 
Last edited:

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,950
41,664
113
Waukee
If we did something crazy we could bump up all the way up to a 5. By crazy, I mean something like...

OSU (W)
@Baylor (W)
Tech (W)
Baylor (W)
Kansas (L)

Echoing the scenario above assuming #5 Iowa State starts off against #4 Texas --

1646235795312.png

Iowa State ends up as the highest #5 seed.

#4s = Illinois, UCLA, Providence, Alabama
#5s = Iowa State, UConn, Arkansas, Texas
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,187
25,037
113
Minneapolis
I know it's Palm who isn't great...but he continues to be, in my mind, good at seeing the outliers and putting them where they should be.

Iowa State is now a 6 with Ohio State losing and dropping to a 7. Michigan State also dropped to a 7. Iowa a 9.

 

goody2012

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 28, 2014
1,145
1,302
113
I think we're locked into a 7 worst case no matter results. Could get up to a 5 with a nice run in KC.
 

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,225
13,096
113
Augusta National Golf Club
Will someone explain to me how ISU is a 7-9 seed while these teams are consistently rated ahead of us?

Iowa State: Q1 wins: 9, Q1+Q2 record: 10-9 with no bad losses

Iowa: Q1 wins: 1, Q1+Q2 record: 7-8 and no bad losses
Ohio St: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Nebby
USC: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 10-4 and one bad loss to Stanford
LSU: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Ole Miss
Mich St: Q1 wins: 4, Q1+Q2: 11-9 with one bad loss to Northwestern

These are all teams we need to actively cheer against.
 

SolarGarlic

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,314
9,629
113
Will someone explain to me how ISU is a 7-9 seed while these teams are consistently rated ahead of us?

Iowa State: Q1 wins: 9, Q1+Q2 record: 10-9 with no bad losses

Iowa: Q1 wins: 1, Q1+Q2 record: 7-8 and no bad losses
Ohio St: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Nebby
USC: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 10-4 and one bad loss to Stanford
LSU: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Ole Miss
Mich St: Q1 wins: 4, Q1+Q2: 11-9 with one bad loss to Northwestern

These are all teams we need to actively cheer against.
I agree, especially considering what we saw when the committee released their top 16. I'm surprised more analysts aren't using that as a guide. The chairman mentioned Quad 1 wins for every team during the reveal, so it's obvious those are major factors in seeding. A lot of bracketologists are emphasizing the NET rankings and KenPom. I think they're overemphasizing.

There is simply no way we are on the 8/9 as of now. But some people can't see past the metrics.

I think we're a 6/7 with a chance to move up in the next two weeks.
 

CyPunch

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2019
4,707
11,988
113
Sandy Springs, GA
Will someone explain to me how ISU is a 7-9 seed while these teams are consistently rated ahead of us?

Iowa State: Q1 wins: 9, Q1+Q2 record: 10-9 with no bad losses

Iowa: Q1 wins: 1, Q1+Q2 record: 7-8 and no bad losses
Ohio St: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Nebby
USC: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 10-4 and one bad loss to Stanford
LSU: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Ole Miss
Mich St: Q1 wins: 4, Q1+Q2: 11-9 with one bad loss to Northwestern

These are all teams we need to actively cheer against.

It is more accurate to say as it sits at this moment ISU is a 6-7 seed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayshellberg

PSYclone22

Visual Analytics Mercenary
SuperFanatic
Aug 15, 2012
5,101
3,211
113
Des Moines
Will someone explain to me how ISU is a 7-9 seed while these teams are consistently rated ahead of us?

Iowa State: Q1 wins: 9, Q1+Q2 record: 10-9 with no bad losses

Iowa: Q1 wins: 1, Q1+Q2 record: 7-8 and no bad losses
Ohio St: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Nebby
USC: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 10-4 and one bad loss to Stanford
LSU: Q1 wins: 5, Q1+Q2: 9-8 with one bad loss to Ole Miss
Mich St: Q1 wins: 4, Q1+Q2: 11-9 with one bad loss to Northwestern

These are all teams we need to actively cheer against.
Iowa: NET rating
Ohio St: NET rating
USC: NET rating
LSU: NET rating
Michigan St: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
  • Like
Reactions: dahliaclone

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,225
13,096
113
Augusta National Golf Club
  • Dumb
Reactions: dahliaclone

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
  • Agree
Reactions: dahliaclone

PSYclone22

Visual Analytics Mercenary
SuperFanatic
Aug 15, 2012
5,101
3,211
113
Des Moines
It doesn't help when CBS's Jon Rothstein is calling us overachievers...

See, I'm fine with saying we've overachieved. Our overall record exceeds the per possession performance of our team.

But we're not the only ones! The below plot shows how every team that is top 100 in Barttorvik's metric average compares against their resume average:
  • Close to the line - achieved (metrics and resume align)
  • Above the line - underachieved (metrics outperforming resume)
  • Below the line - overachieved (resume outperforming metrics)
1646241876881.png

There are plenty of other teams "overachieving" who don't get near the same credit for it as we do. Credit not exactly being the best word to use, but you get it.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,174
1,611
113
I think some people got burned taking ISU in past tournaments so they want to revel in how painful it has been.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,460
39,267
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
Bracketville has ISU now a 6 seed facing the winner of a play-in game between San Fran and Indiana.