What Jere would have said if he 25 wins wasn't a question. The next year was underachieving even with 24 wins because of totally unacceptable loss to Purdue in the tourney. One more win wasn't going to make jere go......"gee, Steve is okay". So we can take jere off the table.
As for your post......it is proving what myself and many have been saying for years.........you just can't give Steve credit without conditions. The guy won 23 games and made the sweet sixteen and you use retroactive numbers to what.......prove it smoke and mirrors?
I have said the Fred vs Steve thing isn't me because I like Fred. But with this post I think we can close the book on any of you just saying he did a good job during his good years.........period. You guys just can't do it.
I don't get it and it's becoming arguing just to argue. I fear in the future someone comes back with new analytics some geek creates to really find out TJ's first year actually sucked. Even though he is past 20 wins and going to the tourney.
A winning season is a winning season. A sweet 16 is a sweet 16. However for some reason at ISU that's not the case. Sad...but true.
How did such a brilliant coach only get 2 wins in his sixth year at Iowa State?