Yawn, this super conference talk. I see 10 pages of new stuff and think, oh something interesting must of happened. NOPE, just 6 people arguing for arguing sake or troll work.
I'd be surprised if anything happened before August.Yawn, this super conference talk. I see 10 pages of new stuff and think, oh something interesting must of happened. NOPE, just 6 people arguing for arguing sake or troll work.
Arizona guy states the simple reality.
Yes, we are both part of NCAA. Breaking away means breaking away from NCAA. If they are going to play other teams outside of their super league, that can be done under the current structure and there is no need to break away. Either it’s a clean split or just an evolution of what we have today.Are we considered together with the FCS? We can and do still schedule them, But we are not together in any way, and play nothing more than what can be considered an exhibition game with them.
I mean we are barely considered together with the G5, but because we still play bowls together we are still loosely attached.
So not for sure when this started, but we probably won't hear anything until after it has expired (guessing like August 4/5).
Maybe there's a possibility that an unknown third party will jump in and save the Pac-12 after those dates.
If there are no good offers (and it seems like what has been reported, the current offers are too low for Pac-12 to continue to exist), I think Mountain schools are gone.
Anyone else zoom thumb-scroll through this thread until you find a tweet to read?
So you are telling me that OuT left to play miss state and wake? Don’t think so, they left for money. How do you get that, the big teams.This has been a lengthy debate between Gonzo, Speedy and others, and a good one. But I’m with Gonzo. The blue bloods will never want a schedule where they only play good teams. They are willing to share revenue with teams like Purdue, Maryland, Iowa and Arkansas. Like my buddy who’s a big EPL soccer fan once said, they want to be able to beat the lesser teams but they want them to care. That makes Iowa and Purdue perfect as long term bottom half teams. The Hawks will trade 8-4 every year against a crap schedule for 4-8 or 6-6 against a schedule with 2, 3 or 4 more power teams on it. OU and Texas would not have left for the SEC if the bottom half of the conference wasn’t there. USC wouldn’t have joined the B1G if they weren’t going to get a steady diet of Minnesota, Illinois, Purdue and Nebraska.
I doubt that’s the case. It’s not an auction. These deals are incredibly complex and we’re talking about rights that are years away. I doubt there is even any discussions until the BiG deal is finalized.I would think if the window closes Aug 4, then any other bidders will be in touch with their bids on Aug 5. Surely they have done all their homework and have their bids ready.
Yep. How many pages of the same argument can you endure? And Hawk/Big Deal 10 arrogance to boot.Anyone else zoom thumb-scroll through this thread until you find a tweet to read?
It absolutely has been done. Big East for one.Also I'm not sure if conferences could ever directly trim the fat as it's never been done before.
In the hypothetical that they'd try to remove non-earners from their bottom-line, I don't know if schools would just align directly and start a new conference, or if they would try to introduce subtle, arcane requirements that force out the small schools on their own. Like a minimum salary for players or something that the bottom-feeders can't finance, essentially forcing them out while pretending that the requirements are some kind of social good.
Probably what's most likely is that you'd have a TV rights broadcaster or something announce they're going to start a super league with insane payouts, and then all the blue-bloods would just leave when their contract expired and they got an invite.
Here we go… curious if their comish has better responses than the ACC’s. Looking for hints on there potential media deal.
Seriously. Can we get a 72-hour moratorium on Iowa-related chat in this thread? It feels like this is becoming ISR 2: Electric Boogaloo. The Iowa references in the last 50 pages or so outnumber the Iowa State references at least 10:1.Hopefully we can limit the ISR board level arguments to a minimum on this thread....
That is only in respect that everything in college sports is under the NCAA umbrella. If you want to go that route D3 is also together with P5...because they are part of NCAA.Yes, we are both part of NCAA. Breaking away means breaking away from NCAA. If they are going to play other teams outside of their super league, that can be done under the current structure and there is no need to break away. Either it’s a clean split or just an evolution of what we have today.
Seriously. Can we get a 72-hour moratorium on Iowa-related chat in this thread? It feels like this is becoming ISR 2: Electric Boogaloo. The Iowa references in the last 50 pages or so outnumber the Iowa State references at least 10:1.