Gofundme for Des Moines trafficking victim

houjix

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2021
1,913
1,917
113
This is why prosecutors make all the difference, as it was prosecutors that chose to seek up to 20 years in prison for Pieper. Luckily she had a judge that recognized that Pieper didn't deserve to go to prison for what happened to her.
No, they didn't. She made a plea deal to voluntary manslaughter and willful injury. Each of those crimes is up to 10 years in prison, but prosecutors did not recommend that harsh of a sentence.

 
  • Winner
Reactions: aauummm

SwirlyBird

Well-Known Member
Aug 2, 2015
2,977
3,071
113
  • Dumb
Reactions: isufbcurt

ISULibrarian

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2010
502
1,112
93
No, they didn't. She made a plea deal to voluntary manslaughter and willful injury. Each of those crimes is up to 10 years in prison, but prosecutors did not recommend that harsh of a sentence.

I realize that at this point in the prosecution; however: 1, the prosecutors made the decision to charge her in the first place, they didn't have to! 2, they could have offered her a plea that didn't include voluntary manslaughter, and thus the restitution requirement. 3, they never charged the man involved with trafficking her; in 2018 the Polk County Attorney's office only brought a grand total of 50(!) sexual assault cases, in a county of half a million people. Also, I want to note that the Polk County Prosecutor's office also made the argument to try her as an adult, rather than a juvenile.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,031
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
This is why prosecutors make all the difference, as it was prosecutors that chose to seek up to 20 years in prison for Pieper. Luckily she had a judge that recognized that Pieper didn't deserve to go to prison for what happened to her.
It seems to me the decision to try her as an adult was the most important one, and the worst one. Everything after that was a consequence of that horrible decision
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
7,654
3,681
113
Arizona
I realize that at this point in the prosecution; however: 1, the prosecutors made the decision to charge her in the first place, they didn't have to! 2, they could have offered her a plea that didn't include voluntary manslaughter, and thus the restitution requirement. 3, they never charged the man involved with trafficking her; in 2018 the Polk County Attorney's office only brought a grand total of 50(!) sexual assault cases, in a county of half a million people. Also, I want to note that the Polk County Prosecutor's office also made the argument to try her as an adult, rather than a juvenile.
Could they charge him posthumously to get the money back from the estate?
The family deserves nothing.
 

ISULibrarian

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2010
502
1,112
93
It seems to me the decision to try her as an adult was the most important one, and the worst one. Everything after that was a consequence of that horrible decision
From a 2021 DMR article:

But in arguing to try her as an adult, Assistant Polk County Attorney Erik Howe seemed to minimize those circumstances, writing, "The child's counsel has made much of the fact that Mr. Brooks seems likely to have committed a crime of his own prior to his death: statutory rape of a minor. While the undersigned certainly doesn't wish to condone or excuse that conduct, it really isn't germane to the discussion of whether waiver is appropriate. While it could potentially serve as a mitigating factor, the Court has no evidence before it to suggest it was a factor in Mr. Brooks' death whatsoever. At best, child's counsel's argument amounts to 'he was a bad guy so he deserved it.'"

That's an astonishing line of reasoning concerning a 15-year-old who has been repeatedly trafficked and raped, sometimes while unconscious after being plied with substances.

Elsewhere, Howe noted that testimony by a Des Moines police detective and other evidence suggested Lewis was living "mostly as an adult. She voluntarily absented herself from not only her parents' home but their attempts to provide rehabilitative services to her," he said, without which, "what hope could any services juvenile court might provide have?" Did he know nothing about her home life?"
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,325
39,359
113
I'm not 100% sold on the judge. He still gave her 5 years probation "so she wouldn't get back into drugs and trouble". Hello she was a rape and sex trafficking victim which is most likely why she got into drugs in the first place.

He had a snarky comment about how she’s gotten a 2nd chance but she wouldn’t get a 3rd. That seemed uncalled for. She wasn’t unpunished for this. She’s on probation for years.
 

ISULibrarian

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2010
502
1,112
93
Could they charge him posthumously to get the money back from the estate?
The family deserves nothing.
I don't think that criminal charges could do that. She could maybe attempt to bring a civil case against that man's family and the man that trafficked her, but who knows the likelihood of her recovering damages.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,179
27,853
113
Dez Moy Nez
He had a snarky comment about how she’s gotten a 2nd chance but she wouldn’t get a 3rd. That seemed uncalled for. She wasn’t unpunished for this. She’s on probation for years.
The justice system is ******* ********. Look at our former president ffs. Worst part is the judges and lawyers are so ******* sanctimonious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jsb and wxman1

Cyrocks

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2009
7,359
8,197
113
Here is a thought. Petition our Gov. Kim Reynolds to have her pardon this young woman.


Oh wait. There might be one little issue to that pardoning thing.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rural and isufbcurt